Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 20, 2019, 08:18:57 pm

Login with username, password and session length

  • Total Posts: 745481
  • Total Topics: 62317
  • Online Today: 341
  • Online Ever: 1421
  • (August 13, 2016, 05:18:44 am)
Users Online
Users: 3
Guests: 104
Total: 107


Welcome to the POZ Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Mammograms vs Thermogram  (Read 3005 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PittGurl

  • Member
  • Posts: 330
Mammograms vs Thermogram
« on: October 09, 2015, 09:50:19 am »
So being new to this DX now everything i do, eat, look at, etc. - im on alert. Today i was supposed to have a Mammogram.  One of my friends on FB posted about an alternative method - called Thermogram....citing that the exposure to radiation was quite a bit and the detection if you have dense tissue wasn't always caught with a mammogram.  I found this website below.....


Now with this DX and hearing people say that now we are more at risk for certain cancers - im afraid to go ahead with this. Oh and by the way, im 43 and ive had mammograms for a few years now and they came back fine.  However, i do have dense breast tissue - not sure if bc of my age or genetics.

So now i am worried and am thinking....should i push out my mammograms to every 1.5 years - 2 years or should i explore this route?  Any advice?
Infected between 5/16/15 - 7/19/15
8-2-15    CD4=286; VL=43800; 15% WB Positive Test Confirmed (waiting for genotype to start Triumeq)
9-4-15    Started Triumeq thanks to the people on this board encouraging me :)
9-21-15    CD4=570; VL 26; 30% 16 days on Triumeq…. HOLY COW it's working!
10-27-15   CD4=522; VL=UNDETECTABLE!!!; 29%    7 wks, 4 days on Triumeq
1-28-16    CD4=479; VL=UD; 31% almost 5 months on Triumeq
4-27-16    CD4=580; VL=UD; 32% almost 8 months on Triumeq
7-28-16    CD4=991; VL=UD; 38% almost 1 year on Triumeq
8-3-16    ONE YEAR DX
10-27-16    CD4=765; VL=UD; 39%
3-8-17   CD4=709; VL=27; 39%
7-13-17   CD4=942; VL=UD; 41%
10/12/17   CD4=626; VL=UD; 39%
1/21/18    CD4=650; VL=UD; 40%
4/26/2018   CD4=893; VL=UD; 39%
8/9/2018   CD4=858; VL=UD; 41%
12/27/'18   CD4=841; VL=UD; 41%

Offline Rosie117

  • Member
  • Posts: 46
Re: Mammograms vs Thermogram
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2015, 04:09:14 pm »
Pitt, I understand where you're coming from but my advice is not to worry about it and do whatever you did before dx. I was diagnosed a year ago this month and it took me several months to stop being anxious over everything, especially the possibility of getting various illnesses or cancers since we are more susceptible. My doctor told me I have to get Pap smears 2x a year now vs once and I should not smoke again (luckily  quit 2 years ago) because in her experience every poz patient she had who smoked developed lung cancer. Otherwise everything I've read indicates the only cancers we are more at risk for are AIDS-related such as Karposi's sarcoma (I may have spelled that wrong) and a few others.

Offline chwhyoche

  • Member
  • Posts: 42
Re: Mammograms vs Thermogram
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2015, 09:24:11 pm »
I was on the fence about this for years.   But my gynecologist is very level headed, acknowledging things like higher cancer rates in certain demographics and on former military land where chemicals were dumped, as well as the real reason modern wheat is so unhealthy is due to glycophosphates, so when she advised me to get a mammogram so that we could get an established baseline of my breast condition, I agreed.  That way if I get lumps in the future, there will be something to compare it with.
Thermography I have heard can be misleading and inaccurrate.  There was a woman whose story I read, who ended up getting severe breast cancer, and had just been using thermography and it did not detect it initially.   

Offline BT65

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 10,786
Re: Mammograms vs Thermogram
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2015, 05:48:16 am »
I've been getting a mammogram regularly for years and am not concerned about the procedure and/or radiation.  There is nothing dangerous about it, so I would just do it. I believe the recommendations for mammograms just changed not too long ago, to like every 2 years if there has been no diagnosis of breast cancer or other problematic issues. 

I understand being anxious. When I was diagnosed almost 30 years ago, everyone was dying and I was told I wouldn't live past a year and to get my affairs in order.  So I was always worried about this or that. Just keep doing what you've been doing.

I've never killed anyone, but I frequently get satisfaction reading the obituary notices.-Clarence Darrow

Condom and Lube Info https://www.poz.com/basics/hiv-basics/safer-sex
Please check out our lessons on PEP and PrEP. https://www.poz.com/basics/hiv-basics/pep-prep



Terms of Membership for these forums

© 2019 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.