Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
January 19, 2018, 04:34:32 PM

Login with username, password and session length

  • Total Posts: 725293
  • Total Topics: 59119
  • Online Today: 395
  • Online Ever: 1421
  • (August 13, 2016, 05:18:44 AM)
Users Online
Users: 3
Guests: 262
Total: 265


Welcome to the POZ Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Anal cytology tests useful for detecting pre-cancerous cell changes in patients  (Read 2720 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,793
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser

Anal cytology tests useful for detecting pre-cancerous cell changes in patients with HIV

Michael Carter, Monday, January 18, 2010

Anal cytology may be a useful tool for detecting pre-cancerous cell changes that can lead to anal cancer, UK investigators report in the online edition of AIDS.

However, the performance of the test depended on the amount of disease present. In addition, it was more accurate in patients with CD4 cell counts below 400 cells/mm3 than in patients with stronger immune systems.

The investigators believe that their finding that the screening tool is especially accurate in patients with lower CD4 cell counts is important, “given the late diagnosis of HIV in a proportion of people with HIV and further increased risk of anal cancer in this group”. They also note that the accuracy of anal cytology is comparable to cervical cytology.

Rates of cervical cancer in England fell dramatically after screening programmes were introduced. By contrast, the number of cases of anal cancer diagnosed in recent years has increased. Especially high rates of the disease are seen in HIV-positive individuals.

Before anal cancer develops, the pre-cancerous lesions form in the anus. These are called anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Prompt diagnosis means that these pre-cancerous changes can be effectively treated.

Despite having high rates of anal cancer, HIV-positive patients are not routinely screened for pre-cancerous cell changes. This is partly because there is limited and contradictory information about the accuracy of screening methods, one of which is cytology.

Screening methods such as biopsies, used to produce histological readings, or high-resolution anoscopy can be uncomfortable.

Investigators in London started using anal cytology (or pap) tests in 2005 and wished to gain a better understanding of their accuracy.

They therefore compared performance of anal cytology against anal histology and high-resolution anoscopy. The cytology test was easy to perform and involved inserting a swab 5cm into the anal canal.

The study involved 395 individuals who were screened between 2005 and 2009. Most (93%) were men and 54% were HIV-positive. These patients provided 584 smear results for evaluation.

“This is a real-life, clinical practice-based study”, comment the investigators.

The investigators conducted sensitivity analyses. This determined how many cases of pre-cancerous anal cell changes the cytology test detected that had been diagnosed using either histology or high-resolution anoscopy.

Overall, cytology detected 70% of the cases diagnosed using histology and 69% of those diagnosed with high-resolution anoscopy.

Cytology detected 71% of the cases of pre-cancerous disease in gay men that were diagnosed using histology. The figure for heterosexuals was 58%. Similar results were seen when cytology was compared to high-resolution anoscopy.

In both new and follow-up patients, anal cytology was more accurate when two or more areas of disease were present.

Anal cytology was more accurate in HIV-positive than HIV-negative individuals. This was the case when the results were compared to those obtained from high-resolution anoscopy (sensitivity 75% vs 61%, p = 0.015) and histology (76% vs 59%, p = 0.009).

High grade disease was detected by anal cytology in 80% of cases in HIV-positive patients and in 93% of cases when the patient was HIV-negative.

Amongst patients with HIV, the anal cytology test was more accurate amongst patients with a CD4 cell count below 400 cells/mm3. In these patients, it detected 90% of the cases of disease compared to a sensitivity of 80% at higher CD4 cell counts.

The investigators therefore believe that anal cytology may be an especially useful screening tool in patients who have their HIV diagnosed late.

In patients taking antiretroviral therapy, cytology detected 77% of the cases of disease identified by histology. Cytology had similar efficacy in patients not taking HIV treatment, having a sensitivity of 73%. Identical results were seen when the cytology results by HIV treatment status were compared to high-resolution anoscopy outcomes.

Statistical analysis showed that anal cytology was significantly more accurate in patients with more extensive anal disease (p < 0.0001) and in HIV-positive patients with lower CD4 cell counts (p = 0.048).

Finally, the investigators found that cytology was more accurate in patients with new diagnoses. The test detected 74% of the cases of disease in new patients that were diagnosed using high-resolution anoscopy, and 63% of those using this screening method in follow-up patients.

“Given the inaccuracies that exist with any method of evaluation, we need to have a number of assessment methods for the diagnosis of anal neoplasia, as is the case with cervical neoplasia”, write the investigators.

“This study supports the introduction of earlier screening in HIV-positive patients, given their higher burden of anal disease and increased sensitivity with lower CD4 cell count levels”, conclude the investigators.

Mayura N et al. Performance of anal cytology in a clinical setting when measured against histology and high-resolution anoscopy findings. AIDS 24 (online edition), 2010.
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Offline veritas

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,410

Miss P,

Interesting link.
Do you have any idea how this particular test would compare to a biopsy during a colonoscopy?

Although, if I understand this correctly, this procedure is another tool for early detection which certainly is a good thing.


Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,793
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
This concerns HPV-related anal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma, not common colorectal cancer.  Meaning that it involves irregular cells in the very first inch or two of the anus, not stuff way up in the colon.

HPV is highly prevalent in HIV+ MSM, with some studies showing close to 100% with specifically the HPV-16 that can cause anal cancer (HPV-18 can also do this).  Everyone should have an anal PAP smear done to test for these strains, and if present they should monitored for growth by a colorectal specialist, preferably one with experience in treating HIV+ patients (not always easy to locate unless you are in a metro area, but any HIV specialist can perform the initial PAP smear).
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Offline veritas

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,410

That's good to know.

At least one would not have to go through an entire colonoscopy to get a hint of this indication.

Nice find !


Offline Denver Toad

  • Member
  • Posts: 169
Thank You Miss P.

Great link, and a very important test for all HIV'ers to have.

This concerns HPV-related anal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma, not common colorectal cancer.  Meaning that it involves irregular cells in the very first inch or two of the anus, not stuff way up in the colon.

Exactly.... different from a colonoscopy and the test is nowhere near as invasive. And it requires no prep unlike an oscopy. Just a swab and very little, if any, discomfort.

Much like having an HIV/AIDS test or colonoscopy better to know what you're facing then assume all's well. And if the test does show pre cancerous it doesn't mean you have cancer. Rather you have a condition that requires ongoing monitoring.
Life is short, Break the rules, Forgive quickly,
Kiss slowly, Love truly, Laugh uncontrollably, And never regret anything that made you smile.

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,793
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Well, if you do have to have laser surgery for anal dysplasia then it is a bit of discomfort.  I've had it done once back in 2004 after the spot being monitored for a couple of years.  My doctor was being prudent and he could have monitored it a bit longer, but he thought it best to go ahead and do it at that time.  I took a couple xanax before the procedure to relax, and the actual laser bit wasn't so bad, but once I got home I had some bleeding down there for a few days and took hydrocodone for pain, and slipped feminine napkins into my underwear and slept on towels.  I've heard of people having MUCH worse bleeding so I got off easy.  The worst part was the first few bowel movements and accompanying anxiety of crapping. 
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"


Terms of Membership for these forums

© 2017 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.