Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 24, 2017, 10:08:19 AM

Login with username, password and session length

  • Total Posts: 722747
  • Total Topics: 58741
  • Online Today: 327
  • Online Ever: 1421
  • (August 13, 2016, 05:18:44 AM)
Users Online
Users: 3
Guests: 297
Total: 300


Welcome to the POZ Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Anyone Ever Had Isolagen Treatment?  (Read 5561 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MitchMiller

  • Member
  • Posts: 564
Anyone Ever Had Isolagen Treatment?
« on: May 30, 2007, 12:20:57 AM »
Isolagen was available in Europe for several years (and may still be).  However, it was prohibitively costly.  It seems to have worked miracles for burn victims.
The product seems to have failed in Europe.  Now a US co. is trying to get approval in the US.  It could possibly be used to treat the forehead and temples... areas of the face that have thin skin (unlike the cheeks).  Your own cells are multiplied in the lab and injected back into your face.  They cause collagen to form, resulting in thickness to the skin.  The treatment is long lasting (years).  I've seen some before and after photos and it looks ok but for the cost.  Reading through some forums where patients posted made it sound like multiple (5+) treatments are required. 
The US co. has a new manufacturing method to reduce cost, but I listened to their investor presentation and they intend to continue to market it for only the top 5% of wrinkled women.  One interesting thing is that they are starting a phase II trial called "full face rejuvenation."  I've never heard of anything like that before (short of a face transplant). 
For more info:  www.isolagen.com.

Offline MitchMiller

  • Member
  • Posts: 564
Re: Anyone Ever Had Isolagen Treatment?
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2007, 10:37:08 PM »
Looks like this treatment had a 20% failure rate... perhaps higher.  See link for photos.

 We were duped over 4,000 'miracle cure' for wrinkles

 Add your view
Julie Dallaston-Morris

Dispute: Julie Dallaston-Morris paid 2,500 for the treatment she claims made no difference. She said: 'I was misled - they said it couldn't fail'
Nicholas L Teti

Probe: Isolagen chairman and chief executive Nicholas L Teti

An American company selling "a miracle cure for wrinkles" is under investigation after hundreds of women complained the expensive procedure did not work.

An estimated 7,000 patients paid up to 4,500 for Isolagen treatment when it was launched amid a huge frenzy in Britain four years ago.

Billed as a non-surgical facelift, the treatment involves removing skin from behind the ear, growing collagen cells in a laboratory, and then re-injecting the collagen into the face to rejuvenate it and smooth wrinkles.

But plastic surgeons who administered the treatment today admitted it had been "over hyped" and that patients were dissatisfied in as many as one in five cases.

The US biotechnology firm behind Isolagen has now shut its Hammersmith-based British branch leaving scores of patients trying to get their money back.

Trading standards officers are investigating, with complaints lodged in Westminster, Haringey and Newcastle. Some of the women have formed a campaign group and are considering legal action against Isolagen or suing the clinics that administered the treatment. The procedure has still to receive approval in the US and is due to undergo testing to make sure it is safe and that it works.

But because such procedures do not require regulation in Britain - Isolagen is not deemed a medicine - the US company was able to pilot the product on British "guinea pigs". It was widely administered by a number of clinics around the country and vigorously marketed by Isolagen.

Actress Emma Samms, best known for her role in Dynasty, was used to promote it.

Marketing executive Julia Dallaston-Morris, 43, of south London, has been in dispute with Isolagen for three years after paying 2,500 for treatments she claims made no difference.

"It was traumatic enough having 30 or 40 injections each time and then depressing to find out that I had spent all that money for something that didn't work. I was misled - they said it couldn't fail."

Julia Hall, 37, told how she spent almost 4,000 - while her partner spent a similar sum - on Isolagen but she alleges it had no effect.

"We have lost almost all our life savings. It was extortionately expensive and at the time the advertising totally duped us into going ahead with the treatment. Isolagen have scarpered and left us high and dry. We want our money back. They have run back to America with people's money.

"The Government should have legislation for this sort of thing."

Westminster Council's trading standards officers confirmed it had received several complaints and was advising on consumer rights and legal action.

Isolagen, headed by chief executive Nicholas L Teti, was unavailable for comment in the US but a posting on its British website insisted the "reason for the closure is financial and is not product or safety related".

Isolagen claims to have successfully treated thousands of women with only a five per cent failure rate.

Douglas McGeorge, President of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, described Isolagen's claims that it "rejuvenated" the skin as "nonsense" and said the product was "completely oversold". He said it was no more than "an expensive biological filler", used to plump out wrinkles.


Terms of Membership for these forums

© 2017 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.