3 big developments make AIDS outlook more hopeful

[Miss Philicia]

3 big developments make AIDS outlook more hopeful

By MARILYNN MARCHIONE, AP Medical Writer
1 hr 33 mins ago

In the nearly 30 years the AIDS epidemic has raged, there has never been a more hopeful day than this. Three striking developments took place Tuesday: U.N. officials said new HIV cases are dropping dramatically worldwide. A study showed that a daily pill already on pharmacy shelves could help prevent new infections in gay men. And the pope opened the way for the use of condoms to prevent AIDS.

"I don't know of a day where so many pieces are beginning to align for HIV prevention and treatment, and frankly with a view to ending the epidemic," said Mitchell Warren, head of the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, a nonprofit group that works on HIV prevention research. "This is an incredibly opportune moment and we have to be sure we seize it."

President Barack Obama said the groundbreaking research on the AIDS drug "could mark the beginning of a new era in HIV prevention."

The U.N. report said that new cases dropped nearly 20 percent over the last decade and that 33.3 million people are living with HIV now.

"We can say with confidence and conviction that we have broken the trajectory of the AIDS pandemic," said UNAIDS Executive Director Michel Sidibe in Geneva.

Health officials credit part of the decline to wider condom use, and on Tuesday, in a historic shift in church teachings, the Vatican said that using a condom is a lesser evil than infecting a sexual partner with HIV.
Condoms remain the best weapon against AIDS, and the new prevention pill is not the chemical equivalent. But scientists called it a true breakthrough. The pill, Gilead Science's Truvada, is already used to treat people with HIV. A three-year global study found that daily doses cut the risk of infection in healthy gay and bisexual men when given with condoms, counseling and other prevention services.

The drug lowered the chances of infection by 44 percent, and by 73 percent or more among men who took their pills most faithfully. Researchers had feared the pills might give a false sense of security and make men less likely to use condoms or to limit their partners, but the opposite happened — risky sex declined.

The results are "a major advance" that can help curb the epidemic in gay men, said Dr. Kevin Fenton, AIDS prevention chief at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But he warned they may not apply to people exposed to HIV through male-female sex, drug use or other ways. Studies in those groups are under way.

Because Truvada is already on the market, the CDC is rushing to develop guidelines for doctors who want to use it to prevent HIV, and urged people to wait until those are ready.

As a practical matter, price could limit use. The pills cost $5,000 to $14,000 a year in the United States, but roughly $140 a year in some poor countries where they are sold in generic form.

Whether insurers or government health programs should pay for them is one of the tough issues to be sorted out, said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

"This is an exciting finding," but it "is only one study in one specific study population," so its impact on others is unknown, Fauci said.

His institute sponsored the study with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The findings were published online by the New England Journal of Medicine.

It is the third AIDS prevention victory in about a year. In September 2009, scientists announced that a vaccine they are now trying to improve protected 1 in 3 people from getting HIV in a study in Thailand. In July, research in South Africa showed that a vaginal gel spiked with an AIDS drug could cut nearly in half a woman's chances of getting HIV from an infected partner.

Gay and bisexual men account for nearly half of the more than 1 million Americans living with HIV. Worldwide, more than 7,000 new infections occur each day. Only 5 to 10 percent of global cases involve sex between men.

"The condom is still the first line of defense," because it also prevents other sexually spread diseases and unwanted pregnancies, said the study leader, Dr. Robert M. Grant of the Gladstone Institutes, a private foundation affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco. But many men don't or won't use condoms all the time, so researchers have been testing other prevention tools.

AIDS drugs already are used to prevent infection in health care workers accidentally exposed to HIV, and in babies born to infected mothers. Taking these drugs before exposure to the virus may keep it from taking hold, just as taking malaria pills in advance can prevent that disease when someone is bitten by an infected mosquito.
The strategy showed great promise in monkey studies using tenofovir (brand name Viread) and emtricitabine, or FTC (Emtriva), sold in combination as Truvada by California-based Gilead Sciences Inc.

The company donated Truvada for the study, which involved about 2,500 men at high risk of HIV infection in Peru, Ecuador, Brazil, South Africa, Thailand and the United States (San Francisco and Boston). The foreign sites were chosen because of high rates of HIV infection and diverse populations.

More than 40 percent of participants had taken money for sex at least once. At the start of the study, they had 18 partners on average; that dropped to around six by the end.

The men were given either Truvada or dummy pills. All had monthly visits to get HIV testing, more pills and counseling. Every six months, they were tested for other sexually spread diseases and treated as needed.
After a median follow-up of just over a year, there were 64 HIV infections among the 1,248 men on dummy pills, and only 36 among the 1,251 on Truvada.

Among men who took their pills at least half the time, the risk of infection fell by 50 percent. For those who took pills on 90 percent or more days, risk fell 73 percent. Tests of drug levels in the blood confirmed that more consistent pill-taking gave better protection, and in one subgroup, the reduction in risk was 92 percent.
The treatment was safe. Side effects were similar in both groups except for nausea in the Truvada patients. Weight loss also was more common in the drug group, but it occurred in very few. Further study is needed on possible long-term risks.

All participants will get a chance to take Truvada in an 18-month extension of the study to see if men will take the pill more consistently if they know it helps, and whether that provides better protection. About 20,000 people are enrolled in other studies testing Truvada or its component drugs around the world.

The government will review all ongoing prevention studies, such as those of vaccines or anti-AIDS gels, and consider whether people getting dummy medicines should now get Truvada since it has been shown effective in gay men.

Gilead may seek approval to market Truvada for prevention, said Dr. Howard Jaffe, president of the company's philanthropic arm. Doctors can prescribe it for this purpose now if patients are willing to pay for it, and some already do.

Some people have speculated that could expose Gilead to new liability concerns, if someone took the pill and then sued if it did not prevent infection.

"The potential for having an intervention like this that has never been broadly available before raises new questions. It is something we would have to discuss internally and externally," Jaffe said.

Until the CDC's detailed advice on Truvada is available, the agency said gay and bisexual men should use condoms consistently and correctly, get tested and treated for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases, get counseling and reduce their number of sexual partners.

[komnaes]

Not sure about the faith they're willing to put on Truvada, consider it's still very costly and they still need to convince otherwise healthy people to take it consistently. I guess the price factor can be mitigated as there are already generic pills available and prices will definitely drop even in the US if more are using it just for prevention. It seems the best scenario is that very soon scientists can develop on top of Truvada a cheap way to deliver the same level of preventive components in the med in a more concentrated form (like, say, a monthly injection) with massively reduced toxicity.

It's definitely good news that infection rate has been dropping in Africa, but it really kind of makes me worry in particularly about China, where what the Pope says has no effects and the government is still way behind in sex education. I still suspect that the number of cases there is grossly under-reported..

[mecch]

There are now 4, count em, threads with the prep as the main subject.
Moderators, can't you combine these threads, please.

This one I am writing in, though its about 3 developments, ok. 

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=35419.msg441004#msg441004

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=35420.msg441022#msg441022

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=35421.msg441025#msg441025

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=35419.msg441078#msg441078

[Miss Philicia]

Isn't this truvada element what I've been telling you guys that circuit queens have been taking (along with their baggies of meth and viagra) for over a decade?

[Theyer]

Good news re Africa but I cannot get excited about the Truvada study.If they are also giving condoms out ,plus the advantages off a monthly session how does this not muddy the results?

Is the overall aim by drug companies to develop a drug to be taken by all sexually active people to act as a internal condom and ongoing suppressor off HIV ?

I need to find time to read "research news"
t

[David_CA]

At the San Francisco AMG, we met up with some NC friends who'd relocated there.  After disclosing what group we were with - after all, it's a pretty assorted, non-homogenized group of people - one of our friends told me he was in an HIV drug study.  He's negative, and the study was to see what the effects were of HIV meds used as PrEP on HIV negative individuals.  His partner had mixed feelings about it (effects from the meds, etc), but our friend said he wanted to help out his HIV+ brothers (and sisters) any way he could.  If I'm not mistaken, he was taking Truvada.  I need to ask him how it all turned out.

As to putting faith in Truvada, I like to think of it (used in this manner) and condoms like air bags and seat belts.  Neither guarantees surviving a car crash, but drivers who have vehicles with air bags and who wear their seat belts are significantly less likely to be seriously injured or die while driving.  The cost is certainly an issue, as is convincing people to take them properly.  Perhaps those 'circuit queens' or guys (or gals) going out for a long weekend at a sex party and those visiting  bath houses, sex clubs, etc will eventually benefit from this. 

If cost wasn't an issue, I'll bet many would take PrEP on such occasions when condom usage was not likely, not practical, or not accepted.  This usage of Truvada may not be the answer, but it's at least acknowledging that safer sex (condom usage) isn't the solution, either (simply due to them not being used / used correctly).