POZ Community Forums

Off Topic Forums => Off Topic Forum => Topic started by: Ihavehope on March 24, 2007, 01:50:25 pm

Title: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Ihavehope on March 24, 2007, 01:50:25 pm
What do u ladies prefer wearing or in your men.

Boxers or briefs.

My package no longer can do briefs therefore I am a boxer boy and i like mis hombres on tight undies.
Title: Re: boxers of briefs..?
Post by: milker on March 24, 2007, 01:52:01 pm
My package no longer can do briefs

 ??? ??? ??? What happened  ??? ??? ???

I don't wear underwear except when flying.

Milker.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Bucko on March 24, 2007, 03:26:33 pm
Like my pal Milkie, I prefer commando unless I'm at work, in which case briefs contain the boys very nicely, thanks.

Brent
(Who notices that jocks aren't one of the choices, although he hasn't worn one in years)
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: thunter34 on March 24, 2007, 03:40:47 pm
I love underwear- on its own.  Commando most times otherwise.

Boxers or briefs?  How about jockstraps?
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Miss Philicia on March 24, 2007, 04:01:49 pm
my currently wearing tight Brazilian jiu jits fight shorts around the house
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: CaptCarl on March 24, 2007, 06:37:37 pm
Commando style here!!
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: puertorico2006 on March 24, 2007, 07:01:14 pm
i like nice tight cute briefs....

i like my calvins and unicos....

and on other guys i prefer briefs or commando is nice lol
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Catman on March 24, 2007, 07:19:48 pm
I like briefs because they cuddle my balls better. Nice and soft cotton is my favorite...any color, but I hate prints unless it's camouflage...I don't use boxers because the "movement" will get me pretty aroused and I don't want to be walking around with a semi-hard boner. I'm really sensitive down there...boxers do look good on other guys, though. And what is "commando" underwear? Post a picture anyone... ???
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Ihavehope on March 24, 2007, 07:26:28 pm
I like briefs because they cuddle my balls better. Nice and soft cotton is my favorite...any color, but I hate prints unless it's camouflage...I don't use boxers because the "movement" will get me pretty aroused and I don't want to be walking around with a semi-hard boner. I'm really sensitive down there...boxers do look good on other guys, though. And what is "commando" underwear? Post a picture anyone... ???

commando means no undies.

Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: thunter34 on March 24, 2007, 07:36:31 pm
and why is that called commando anyway?  free-balling, yes.  but commando?  what is commando about not wearing underwear?
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Catman on March 24, 2007, 07:44:21 pm
commando means no undies.


Lol. So I was asking for a pic of someone without underwear! Ha,ha. I had never heard of that word referring to "no undies" :D.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: dtwpuck on March 24, 2007, 07:53:56 pm
Since I moved to Michigan I stopped going commando in the winter.  But I have found that the more comfortable boxers do not always mitigate the

1. jewelry  and
2. my tendency to get hard at the slightest thing.

Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: keypps on March 24, 2007, 08:02:10 pm
For me it all depends on the outfit and occassion...I prefer my guys in briefs!
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: cmhjeff on March 24, 2007, 08:53:49 pm
I have a few jocks but definitely a boxer brief kind of guy. I like to be pointing north but Jeffrey always laughs at me about that. As for my guys I like them in just about anything as long as it comes off.

Jeff
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Just John on March 24, 2007, 08:56:50 pm
Boxers in nice soft cotton or commando here.

As for my Guys-------------I like 'em in me!!! :D
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: tigger2376 on March 24, 2007, 09:57:55 pm
Butt hugging soft cotton, calvin style boxers..its nice to IMAGINE whats in the giftbox, and untie the ribbon slowly..with your teeth! ;D
My boyfriend goes commando (unless we go to dinner at his mums!).....bless :D
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: milker on March 24, 2007, 09:58:51 pm
Butt hugging soft cotton

Butt hugging? Why didn't I use this as a nickname!

Milker
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Amosboy on March 24, 2007, 10:01:06 pm
A pictures says a thousand words but I like to wear briefs.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Queen Tokelove on March 24, 2007, 10:13:12 pm
I use to wear boxers because they are more comfortable. I don't have any balls but would like my man in either but a nice ass does make briefs look even better.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: edfu on March 25, 2007, 12:40:11 am
Obviously, all those who like going commando are not amongst the multitudes here who suffer from that great #1 HAART side effect:  diarrhea, or the squirts.  I would rather soil a pair of tighty whities than a pair of jeans or pants.     
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Buckmark on March 25, 2007, 09:47:18 am
For me it is definitely boxers, not briefs. Have tried commando, but I just have too much hair all over that gets caught in zippers, buttons, seams, etc. , and I don't appreciate the pinching, pulling and snag.  Is this too much information?

Henry
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: thunter34 on March 25, 2007, 10:05:17 am
For me it is definitely boxers, not briefs. Have tried commando, but I just have too much hair all over that gets caught in zippers, buttons, seams, etc. , and I don't appreciate the pinching, pulling and snag.  Is this too much information?

Henry

Or perhaps still not enough.    ;D


Mornin', Henry!
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Buckmark on March 25, 2007, 10:50:04 am
Basically, having a hairy butt just isn't a good match for commando, IMHO.

Any additional information will have to be disclosed in person.  In that regard, I'd be happy to provide you with a full report, Tim.  ;)

Cheers,

Henry


Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: GSOgymrat on March 25, 2007, 11:40:57 am
I wear briefs most of the time as I prefer to avoid unsightly bulges in public. I wear boxers with certain slacks and I sometimes wear nothing at home. My brother talked me into trying boxer briefs and I hate them. They start out okay but eventually end up bunched up over my quads and hamstrings. Anyone else experience this?
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: CaptCarl on March 25, 2007, 12:37:36 pm
Ford,
    Bulges in public are never unsightly, as long as they are protruding fome the proper area of the body. After thinking a lot about this post, I realize that two things. A) No one has commented on the phenomenon of boxer-briefs, and B) I really don't care what kind of underwear a guy is wearing, as long as it comes off easily ;D

Capt.Carl  (whose off to Home Depot to figure out who is wearing what)
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: bear60 on March 25, 2007, 12:41:13 pm
Its a sad commentary on the times....but  "going comando" was made popular by Joey on FRIENDS...wasnt it?
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Miss Philicia on March 25, 2007, 03:14:54 pm
In honor of this thread, I am now wearing a black leather "Cod Piece Tom Brief, Thong with Universal Pouch" (http://www.mr-s-leather.com/cgi-bin/mr-s/L481T.html)
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: budndallastx on March 25, 2007, 04:14:23 pm
Bear is correct, Going Commando came from the show "Friends".   


As for my preference, boxers around the house and tidy whiteys when away from home...


And Philly, care to share a pic ?!?  :P
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Matty the Damned on March 25, 2007, 05:10:19 pm
It has been well established that people who wear briefs are much more likely to be thieves and rapists.

Matty the Damned freeballs or wears boxers.

MtD
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: JohnOso on March 25, 2007, 06:20:47 pm
For me it is definitely boxers, not briefs. Have tried commando, but I just have too much hair all over that gets caught in zippers, buttons, seams, etc. , and I don't appreciate the pinching, pulling and snag.  Is this too much information?

Henry

I'm able to get a mental image, but I think I'm going to need some pictures to flesh it out a bit.

John
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Queen Tokelove on March 25, 2007, 10:32:58 pm
I'm able to get a mental image, but I think I'm going to need some pictures to flesh it out a bit.

John

Hmmm speaking of imagining, are you wearing boxers in your avatar, John. Just curious and just saying......
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: megasept on March 25, 2007, 11:02:54 pm
It has been well established that people who wear briefs are much more likely to be thieves and rapists.

Matty the Damned freeballs or wears boxers.

MtD

In that case. let me switch from boxers to briefs.  8)  -megasept
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: thunter34 on March 25, 2007, 11:45:11 pm
In honor of this thread, I am now wearing a black leather "Cod Piece Tom Brief, Thong with Universal Pouch" (http://www.mr-s-leather.com/cgi-bin/mr-s/L481T.html)

HAWT
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: aztecan on March 26, 2007, 12:38:37 am
Actually, it wasn't friends where "going commando" originated, although the term may have started there.

Many of us old fagalas eschewed underwear back in the 70s. In fact, I remember a bar where underwear hung above the bar, removed from those foolish enough to wear them into the bar.

When I wear underwear, usually with slacks or dress pants, it is tighty whities, 2xist brand only, because they seem to be the only brand that include a pouch large enough to hold Jean Claude and the boys.

Jeans are made for commando mode though. That is why 501s became so popular, because with the buttons, there was easier access and no problems with things getting caught in a zipper.

I used to have trained 501s. One tug at the appropriate spot and all the buttons popped open, making for easy access for those nearby, especially on a crowded dance floor or dark back room.

HUGS,

Mark
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: fearless on March 26, 2007, 12:42:02 am
I've never understood boxers - if i'm wearing shorts/trousers/pants, why on earth would i wanna wear another pair of shorts underneath? It's all just too hot and uncomfortable.

I wear briefs.

Going Commando, while enticing is just not a great option given the HAART side effects.

I always thought, going commando meant, being ready for action

Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Dachshund on March 26, 2007, 12:46:07 am
I wear what Joseph Smith tells me to wear...


         www.mormon-underwear.com
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: thunter34 on March 26, 2007, 12:50:20 am
Actually, it wasn't friends where "going commando" originated, although the term may have started there.

Many of us old fagalas eschewed underwear back in the 70s. In fact, I remember a bar where underwear hung above the bar, removed from those foolish enough to wear them into the bar.

When I wear underwear, usually with slacks or dress pants, it is tighty whities, 2xist brand only, because they seem to be the only brand that include a pouch large enough to hold Jean Claude and the boys.

Jeans are made for commando mode though. That is why 501s became so popular, because with the buttons, there was easier access and no problems with things getting caught in a zipper.

I used to have trained 501s. One tug at the appropriate spot and all the buttons popped open, making for easy access for those nearby, especially on a crowded dance floor or dark back room.

HUGS,

Mark


the trained 501's...star poster for this thread.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Dachshund on March 26, 2007, 12:59:58 am
I've never understood boxers - if i'm wearing shorts/trousers/pants, why on earth would i wanna wear another pair of shorts underneath? It's all just too hot and uncomfortable.

I wear briefs.

Going Commando, while enticing is just not a great option given the HAART side effects.

I always thought, going commando meant, being ready for action




If I were a betting man I would bet dollars to doughnuts, no one, I mean, no one looks cuter in briefs that our own little Steve.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Miss Philicia on March 26, 2007, 01:04:18 am
HAWT

I also have black rubber briefs and a wrestling singlet!
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: david25luvit on March 26, 2007, 01:44:50 am
I'm not a lady (although some would disagree) but I'm a fan of both....
personally I wear boxers most of the time but with tight jeans and
shorts I wear boxer briefs......Just cause.... :P
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: bt1313 on March 26, 2007, 11:41:07 am
how about boxer briefs for me when its cold...but by summer its commando
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: GSOgymrat on March 26, 2007, 11:45:00 am
Ford's underwear fashion advice:

I think that men who are heavier look better in boxers and guys who are trim look better in briefs, particularly from behind. As a rule if you are going to wear bikini underwear you better have a flat stomach or you are just emphasizing that belly jelly. Similarly, unless it's for utilitarian purposes you better have a nice butt if you are running around in a jock strap. Those two elastic bands in the back can be unforgiving. If you are going commando in public make sure your pants or shorts are of heavy enough fabric and have enough crotch room. People don't mind seeing there is something down there but they don't want to know what religion you are. Note to people in the South and other humid regions who go commando-- underwear absorbs perspiration and butt crack sweat stains are never sexy.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Basquo on March 26, 2007, 12:17:55 pm
All of the above for me, except no boxers or commando in the summer--what we refer to as "sack-sticking weather."
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: GSOgymrat on March 26, 2007, 12:25:19 pm
All of the above for me, except no boxers or commando in the summer--what we refer to as "sack-sticking weather."

LOL. So true.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: thunter34 on March 26, 2007, 12:28:29 pm
Another Star Poster award should be given to gso for his post 41.  Such a well thought out examination of all things underwear.  You've given this a great deal of thought, haven't you?   ;D
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: JohnOso on March 26, 2007, 07:56:54 pm
Hmmm speaking of imagining, are you wearing boxers in your avatar, John. Just curious and just saying......


Yup those are boxers, my blue-collar undergarment of choice, Queen!  ;D
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Queen Tokelove on March 26, 2007, 08:06:39 pm

Yup those are boxers, my blue-collar undergarment of choice, Queen!  ;D

While other things may be failing, at least I still have good eye sight. ;D
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: marc11864 on March 27, 2007, 08:42:33 pm
I've been wearing tighty whities since I got out of diapers. Nothing will ever change that. They took on a special significance for me about the same time that I was moving into my adolescence. Luv 'em! Soooo sexy!  ;D

(Note: I did not say "THE SAME" tighty whities.) :D
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: milker on March 27, 2007, 08:43:21 pm
Oh yeah diapers  :D :D :D :D :D :D

Milker.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: way.out.west on March 27, 2007, 10:02:45 pm
Definitely briefs.  I perspire down there more than most men, and that creates a clammy environment perfect for a fungus called tinea curis (jock itch), which causes my inner thighs to become painfully raw - trust me on this, jock itch is not conducive to dating.  Even though it’s curable, the fungus can be hard to eliminate.  Briefs absorb the perspiration, keeping the equipment nice and dry.  Maybe that’s more than you all wanted to know.   :-[

EDITED TO ADD:  But if we're talking about what we want to see other men wearing, I vote for a t-shirt and nothing else.  ;)
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: milker on March 27, 2007, 10:08:20 pm
Definitely briefs.  I perspire down there more than most men
Hot!

, and that creates a clammy environment perfect for a fungus called tinea curis (jock itch), which causes my inner thighs to become painfully raw
Not Hot!

Milker.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: cmhjeff on March 29, 2007, 09:38:27 pm
I've always liked jocks  ;D
Jeff

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Miss Philicia on March 30, 2007, 05:25:13 pm
OK... who is going to order these and try them out?

http://www.internationaljock.com/ballbra-white-brief,6001.html

please report back stat!
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Cerrid on March 30, 2007, 05:59:19 pm
Boxers. I usually prefer the tight white cotton with elastics fibre variety. However, on special occasions it has to be the burgundy silk type. Plenty of room and slippery even when dry.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Catman on March 30, 2007, 07:34:18 pm
OK... who is going to order these and try them out?

http://www.internationaljock.com/ballbra-white-brief,6001.html

please report back stat!
Wow! I'm drooling again! I got pretty excited just looking at the other styles, also! :P
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: tigger2376 on March 30, 2007, 08:03:18 pm
Anyone tried edible underwear? Don't recommend the tropical fuit flavour! ;D
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: JesusLovesYou on April 09, 2007, 03:28:01 pm
Boxer-briefs, especially if there is a bubble butt attached to them.  ;)
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: jkinatl2 on April 09, 2007, 03:29:36 pm
Interesting :)
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: sdcabincrew74 on April 09, 2007, 07:19:27 pm
boxers unless flying the friendly skies, otherwise, the ouline of my dick in my uniform pants looks unprofessional, according to my sup, although it has gotten me more than a few phone numbers .... LOL ... so at work, briefs!
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: mark54 on April 09, 2007, 07:29:12 pm
i'm surprised everyone is so hard core definite on this subject,  the first decision of every day is what mood i'm in for underwear.   i once hired a beautiful young blond buck for my warehouse, heavy lifting for the summer.  so within a couple hours it was all over the plant he had on a yellow lace thong.  i really try to avoid social issues at work but that day i was like oh, somebody just shoot me, please.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Catman on April 09, 2007, 07:31:42 pm
boxers unless flying the friendly skies, otherwise, the ouline of my dick in my uniform pants looks unprofessional, according to my sup, although it has gotten me more than a few phone numbers .... LOL ... so at work, briefs!

Hmmm...I'm pretty sure you'd make my flight much more enjoyable! Boxers for you, then.  ;)
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: incognito on April 10, 2007, 06:50:26 am
briefs.......   wet!
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: skeebo1969 on April 10, 2007, 08:59:49 am
What do u ladies prefer wearing or in your men.

Boxers or briefs.

My package no longer can do briefs therefore I am a boxer boy and i like mis hombres on tight undies.


 Has anyone else noticed this?


Boxer-briefs, especially if there is a bubble butt attached to them.  ;)

  This is definitely a split personality disorder!  First he likes em in tight undies....  Then in his second coming he likes them in boxer briefs.  I say Peter should lift the ban and make the guy log in as Sybil.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Catman on April 10, 2007, 06:06:59 pm

 Has anyone else noticed this?


  This is definitely a split personality disorder!  First he likes em in tight undies....  Then in his second coming he likes them in boxer briefs.  I say Peter should lift the ban and make the guy log in as Sybil.

 ROFLMAO!  :D This is waay too funny for me! Ha,ha! I remember that movie from the 70's!
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: sdcabincrew74 on April 11, 2007, 11:33:33 pm
Hmmm...I'm pretty sure you'd make my flight much more enjoyable! Boxers for you, then.  ;)

I agree, but again, I have been written up for it .... amazingly enough by a sup that after writting me up, said it looked like I was well endowed and asked me out .... LOL .... I said no, but later had his big uncut raw cock up my ass at a bathhouse....
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Catman on April 12, 2007, 06:43:06 pm
I agree, but again, I have been written up for it .... amazingly enough by a sup that after writting me up, said it looked like I was well endowed and asked me out .... LOL .... I said no, but later had his big uncut raw cock up my ass at a bathhouse....

 :D LMAO! I guess he was forgiven, then! ;)
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Boo Radley on April 12, 2007, 07:05:29 pm
I've been going commando since junior high school.   Only one scorchmark in 40 years.   Maybe this post belongs in the poo thread and not here. 

While staying with my aunt and uncle during a bus strike (so I could get to my job without the striking buses... duh) when I was 18 or 19 after about a week my Aunt Ruth asked me about my white laundry, and I replied I had none.  She seemed a little bemused (as in, how can one not have any white laundry?) but took it in her usual stride.
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Matty the Damned on April 12, 2007, 07:34:48 pm
Maybe this post belongs in the poo thread and not here. 

Matty the Damned believes that the Poo Thread is AIDSMEDS greatest achievement.

MtD
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: david25luvit on April 14, 2007, 02:51:58 am
I prefer Commando....personally :o
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: GoodMatchHawaiiRetreat on April 17, 2007, 12:23:48 am
Commando!
In Hawai'i I've seen a bumper sticker, "Just say NO to underwear"
Living near a clothing optional beach, most of us in the area just say NO to clothes.
And then there is the infamous clothing optional volleyball at the banana farm on Saturdays....
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: Boo Radley on April 17, 2007, 03:35:20 pm
Living near a clothing optional beach, most of us in the area just say NO to clothes.

I tried sunbathing at a nude beach once but pesky people from Greenpeace kept trying to roll me back into the water.




"Mum, I don't care that you haven't seen your navel for 25 years and can wear your stomach as a kilt!  Just tell me you're happy!"

"Oh, sweety-darling, how can I be happy with this huge bulk hanging off of me?"



"Don't let her torture you. Eddy, she's the reason you're standing here now looking like a...  potato!"
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: antibody on April 17, 2007, 03:49:13 pm
i like to go free balling in the summer when it's just too hot to wear anything but my mom said always wear clean chonnies so i wear boxers, can't stand nut huggers or tightie whities
Title: Re: boxers vs briefs..?
Post by: GoodMatchHawaiiRetreat on April 18, 2007, 04:00:58 am
Someone once asked George Bush whether he prefered boxers or briefs.

His reply:

Depends.