Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 26, 2024, 12:58:32 am

Login with username, password and session length


Members
  • Total Members: 37652
  • Latest: Han2024
Stats
  • Total Posts: 773292
  • Total Topics: 66348
  • Online Today: 670
  • Online Ever: 5484
  • (June 18, 2021, 11:15:29 pm)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 639
Total: 639

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Do I Have HIV?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED  (Read 6156 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BlkRedBonenla

  • Member
  • Posts: 85
    • My MySpace Page
SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« on: November 02, 2007, 06:08:22 am »
I've noticed this mostly on the internet dating scene. A guy will have a picture posted of himself, which turns out to be BEFORE to started meds or before those meds began to affect his appearance.

While I think this is something gay men should talk about - what is a an honest pic? - that is not my immediate question.

Rather, how long does it take on average for meds to have that effect on the body? Are there some meds that effect us more? Are there ways to avoid being affected at all???

Obviously I want no internal nor external side effects, but this query is mostly about EXTERNAL effects.

When my doctor and I were negotiating which med would be best for me one of my requirements was minimal side effects, inside our out. I have been on ATRIPLA for about 9 months, no problems.

I hope all are well,
Lowell
- cd4 20 2/07 & 50K VL

**** 3/07 started ATRIPLA *******
- cd4 70 5/07 & Undetectable VL
- cd4 218 11/07 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 297 3/08 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 439 1/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 436 4/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 442 8/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 512 11/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 531 2/10 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 439??? 6/10 & Undetectable VL ...


_____________________________________

"A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing, but some minds can only handle a little." - George Bernard Shaw

Offline allopathicholistic

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2007, 10:15:17 am »
Hi Lowell. Kudos to anyone who can answer those tough questions! I certainly don't know, but my friend is newly diagnosed and not on meds and he's been taking trapeeze lessons (yeah, flying through the air and all that) for the past 6 weeks. The bich is starting to look great with new muscle tone and all that. I think part of it's because of all that blood circulation he's getting. My instinct says he's gonna look marvelous for years to come. Good on him I guess but I have to say I'm a little envious  ::)

Offline BlkRedBonenla

  • Member
  • Posts: 85
    • My MySpace Page
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2007, 09:43:16 pm »
Hi Lowell. Kudos to anyone who can answer those tough questions! I certainly don't know, but my friend is newly diagnosed and not on meds and he's been taking trapeeze lessons (yeah, flying through the air and all that) for the past 6 weeks. The bich is starting to look great with new muscle tone and all that. I think part of it's because of all that blood circulation he's getting. My instinct says he's gonna look marvelous for years to come. Good on him I guess but I have to say I'm a little envious  ::)

Well .. trapeeze lessons is not in my future, but my bias tells me an active lifestyle, good diet [did you all see the report out of the UK linking red meat to cancer, supposedly the most comprehensive study to date: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/article2779937.ece?EMC-Bltn] will yield better health and - to my concern - better appearance. But exercise does not make us superman, invicible to toxic medications over some duration of time.

I would THINK that someone would have some stats on this, which population is likely to experience side effects with certain drugs [my doctor said that Blacks tended to have adverse side effects to early dosing of AZT, for example], and what characteristics - genetic and social - those who experienced fewer side effects and physical effects.
- cd4 20 2/07 & 50K VL

**** 3/07 started ATRIPLA *******
- cd4 70 5/07 & Undetectable VL
- cd4 218 11/07 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 297 3/08 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 439 1/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 436 4/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 442 8/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 512 11/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 531 2/10 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 439??? 6/10 & Undetectable VL ...


_____________________________________

"A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing, but some minds can only handle a little." - George Bernard Shaw

Offline Smoothstone

  • Member
  • Posts: 96
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2007, 01:02:23 pm »
For over 10 years I have been on the combination of viracept, rescriptor, and ziagen. No body change side effects for me, a white male, 60. I ended up with that combination after experiencing problems with other meds.If I noticed body changes I switched. This decision process took a trial period of how the drugs made me feel, and also how I perceived they were effecting my appearance. I talking about subtle changes, not dramatic.  I figured that if noticed some body shape changes early on, I'm talking about an observation period of several weeks to a month, then the changes would only get more noticeable over time. That was guess work. At one point I stopped meds because of side effects and without any meds my t cells were going downward for about 5 months. Bottomed out at 26 t cells.  I knew ziagen was in the pipeline so I held off on starting the other two drugs rescriptor and viracept until I could do all three together. Luckily, it was a, surprisingly, side effect free combo....with the exception of diarrhea from the viracept.. which tapered off overtime.  I know others where the diarrhea didn't taper off and they stopped viracept because of the diarrhea issue.

 Individual differences come into play with some folks having problems with a drug and for others its easy, side effect free. That is the guess work, exploration work for each of us.
 
     I have no tolerance for azt at any dose, even 100 mg a day wrecks me. achy and nausea.
     With D4T I noticed peripheral neuropathy in my feet but thought I would get used to the drug and it would go away over time...the "tough it out" strategy...error on my part...the tingling in my feet got worse overtime...it would have been better to have reduced dose or stop much earlier. I mentioned the problem to my doc but he reinforced the "tough it out" approach...of course we were all trying a new drug and didn't have the benefit of collective experience and knowledge. My doc did not also experience the tingling so it was easy for him to be dismissive about it.
     Good luck in your exploration. Hank 
     

Offline Smoothstone

  • Member
  • Posts: 96
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2007, 01:06:54 pm »
Basic rule: always report side effects to your doc and check in about if and how to stop or switch meds. Hank

Offline BlkRedBonenla

  • Member
  • Posts: 85
    • My MySpace Page
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2007, 05:49:56 pm »
For over 10 years I have been on the combination of viracept, rescriptor, and ziagen. No body change side effects for me, a white male, 60. I ended up with that combination after experiencing problems with other meds.If I noticed body changes I switched. This decision process took a trial period of how the drugs made me feel, and also how I perceived they were effecting my appearance. I talking about subtle changes, not dramatic.  I figured that if noticed some body shape changes early on, I'm talking about an observation period of several weeks to a month, then the changes would only get more noticeable over time. That was guess work ...

Thanks, Hank ... so I'm wondering as part of my question: do you think other people aren't as attentive to their appearance; willing to give up "appearances" for what they have been told is "health," or by posting these pictures of themselves in a former visage they just don't notice the sometimes radical changes that take place??

I KNOW this part of my question is full of problems and may not be answerable .. and maybe a question better asked in a different forum all together. But we talk a lot about the medical side effects, less about the psychological impact of being young and told you have an INCURABLE disease, and nothing at all about facing the world, living.
- cd4 20 2/07 & 50K VL

**** 3/07 started ATRIPLA *******
- cd4 70 5/07 & Undetectable VL
- cd4 218 11/07 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 297 3/08 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 439 1/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 436 4/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 442 8/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 512 11/09 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 531 2/10 & Undetectable VL
-cd4 439??? 6/10 & Undetectable VL ...


_____________________________________

"A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing, but some minds can only handle a little." - George Bernard Shaw

Offline dgr20002

  • Member
  • Posts: 288
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #6 on: November 03, 2007, 11:33:10 pm »
You may never have any effects. And they do not happen overnight.  There are certain drugs that have more of an effect than others. Crixivan is known to cause facial wasting, veiny legs and arms etc. I don't even know if it is prescribed much anymore since there are so many other drugs to choose from.

While some guys might deliberately put the best picture they have on the internet, the question can always be asked if it is recent or if he has others. I ran a picture on gay.com for a few years that was good. I was only two years old and I didnt think I looked any different. But I may look a little different each day. Some better than others. Guys that have pictures that are 5 years old or so are really just trying to represent themselves in what they feel is the best light. I imagine that's sort of understood. It's the internet. You never really know who you are chatting with.

Good questions though....

David

Offline bimazek

  • Member
  • Posts: 781
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2007, 12:27:55 pm »
many huge big issues brought up by this great post and question,   sexual addiction and love addiction and sex compulsion are rampant on the internet gay sites, and men treating men as objects without any care for emotional side of people, so this make pictures have this huge importance instead of inner self life

anyway

i have seen very small almost unnoticeable changes in the faces of guys on combos that are not suppose to have big effects, i know they are poz and i know they have been on meds for a year, and i love them but i see a difference i think that worse case... there are some changes, there are tons of new good things that wont have any side effects like this coming out in 3-5-7 years   things like RNAi, gene therapy, vaccines, mutation enhancers, etc, so even if there is some thin ness to the face eventually maybe we can gain it back when new better meds come out


i

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,793
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2007, 01:33:51 pm »
Yeah.  You an find a lot of that on sites like BigMuscle.com...as well as some deception with the photographs.  Heck, some guys are even deceptive about their true HIV status on there.

That's much more appalling than a lipo-queen using an old photograph though, don't you think?
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Offline thunter34

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,374
  • His name is Carl.
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2007, 01:46:31 pm »
At one point I stopped meds because of side effects and without any meds my t cells were going downward for about 5 months. Bottomed out at 26 t cells.  I knew ziagen was in the pipeline so I held off on starting the other two drugs rescriptor and viracept until I could do all three together.


EEEK and EGAD !!

Honey, I'd take a weathered face over a pretty coffin any day. 
AIDS isn't for sissies.

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,793
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2007, 01:57:44 pm »
Agreed.  I don't understand this outlook really.  Do I want to be laid out in a funeral parlor or do I want some lipo?  Anyway, that was the choice for years.  I don't see that so much as the choice RIGHT NOW with more improved meds available.  One must keep in mind that the large majority of lipo you may encounter in other HIV infected individuals are the delayed result of meds used in the 1990's.

I also find it rather interesting that there are so many on this board who complain about discrimination on on-line internet sites when they list their status as HIV-positive, yet they're willing to be somewhat discriminatory to someone with lipo, which I guess is why someone in that situation would use an old picture or perhaps one that doesn't show it to such an extreme.  Never mind that some then turn around and lament how gay society is so appearance oriented and addicted to sex -- the same people who often seem to be the ones hiring hookers and spending hours hooking up.

There are all sorts of levels of hypocrisy with that, but I digress.
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Offline frenchpat

  • Member
  • Posts: 519
  • Love your friends, don't eat them.
Re: SIDE EFFECTED VS NOT SIDE EFFECTED
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2007, 03:19:10 pm »
Rather, how long does it take on average for meds to have that effect on the body? Are there some meds that effect us more? Are there ways to avoid being affected at all???

Obviously I want no internal nor external side effects, but this query is mostly about EXTERNAL effects.
Lowell

Hi Lowell,

firstly, having never dated over the internet or seen such a site I will not address your first question, I am simply not qualified; but I trust this place is home to a few specialist  ;D who can answer that.

When it comes to side effects, and more precisely effects that show on your body, like lipodistrophy, I imagine Philly's right. But I would like to say that not all of those who are affected by lipo had to wait a long time into their infection or into their haart therapy to witness the changes. 2 years is all it took for me. Some have had lipo and are still not on meds.

I am not trying to paint a bleak picture here but just making you aware that it does happen and it does happen to people with a background of a healthy lifestyle with plenty of physical activity. I have a hunch that it is all down to an individual's susceptibility to certain substances and/or hiv itself.

Of course we are all worried about side effects and want to avoid them as much as possible, but your remark about "external" side effects makes me want to say this:
As much as I dislike my lipo, as much as I would love to have my fat back, I'd rather try to be at peace with a changing body image and concentrate on keeping my heart, liver and pancreas in great shape. I may not win a beauty contest with those but I know what is more important in making my stay on this planet a lengthy one.


Quote
...there are some changes, there are tons of new good things that wont have any side effects like this coming out in 3-5-7 years  ...

Biz, although I am quite hopeful that in the future there will be better, less toxic, more efficient medicines for people with Hiv, I also think that no amount of enthusiasm for science allows you to affirm what I quoted above.

Long term side effects are simply impossible to predict when one deals with molecules never used before against a virus that we still don't know everything about, and certainly not in the environment that is the human body, whose subtle workings we are far from having fully understood.

Hope this helps,

Pat


PS: pet peeve: wouldn't it be lovely if the spell checker recognized terms such as lipodistrophy and haart? It does recognize dildo...
People have the power - Patti Smith

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2024 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.