POZ Community Forums

Main Forums => Living With HIV => Topic started by: Hellraiser on April 15, 2010, 08:26:00 pm

Title: What a jerk.
Post by: Hellraiser on April 15, 2010, 08:26:00 pm
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20002258-504083.html

The quote at the end was enough to make me hate the man.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: joyluckclub on April 15, 2010, 08:33:25 pm
The quote "Treat others as you would like to be treated" rings true.

Or,

"Don't kick the individual behind you because it could be the butt you kiss as you come down"
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: skeebo1969 on April 15, 2010, 08:58:51 pm



     The article says nothing about actual exposure.  It's not even known whether the guy is positive or not. >:(  This guy may have been using condoms all along and his partner is negative as a result of it. 

And the quote you mentioned might just be due to the ignorance of others that him, you, and I know exist.  Not saying I agree with non-disclosure, but I can certainly understand his stance.  I'm going to reserve judgement on this one until more details are given. 
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Boo Radley on April 15, 2010, 09:03:01 pm
My, my, we are quick to judge (and hate), aren't we? 

Maybe Chiacchia was always the receptive partner so knew transmission risk was very low.  Maybe  he's on HAART and was as ignorant as you about risk transmission:

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=32166.msg394948#msg394948 (http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=32166.msg394948#msg394948)

In the following article an acquaintance of both men states the accuser told him of Chiacchia's status months before he filed charges in August:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/sports/12hiv.html?pagewanted=2&src=mv (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/sports/12hiv.html?pagewanted=2&src=mv)

We don't even know if the former partner is HIV+ -- but that doesn't make a difference, does it?  It's the law. 

Almost all HIV/AIDS legal organizations decry laws such as the one under which Mr. Chiacchia is charged.   Jesus, in Louisiana I could be sentenced to prison for spitting on or biting someone, but since it's the law it must be right.  "In 2008 in Dallas, an H.I.V.-positive man was found guilty of spitting at a police officer and is serving 35 years in prison." -- from the article above.  I guess you hate that bastard too?   

I have always disclosed my status and believe it is the only ethical option but that is my personal belief.   Until I know more about this case I feel it's unfair to pass judgment on anyone.   I have no qualms about sending someone to prison who knowingly infects another (without that person's "consent") but if the virus hasn't been transmitted it's just a stupid law.

Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Hellraiser on April 15, 2010, 09:08:43 pm
He knew he was HIV+ and slept with someone without telling them.  Essentially he took the choice out of their hands on whether or not they wanted to sleep with someone who was positive.  No amount of moral relativism can distance him from that statement.  Disclosure is all we have to protect ourselves from stigmatization.  Give someone else the decision to make instead of selfishly keeping the information to yourself and >potentially< putting them at risk.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: skeebo1969 on April 15, 2010, 09:17:21 pm




     
Disclosure is all we have to protect ourselves from stigmatization. 


    After I was diagnosed I felt the same way you did, but after seeing many similar cases I've learned that lack of education and the resulting laws on disclosure to be just as bad. 
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: jkinatl2 on April 15, 2010, 09:34:25 pm
I will cheerfully agree to prosecute those who do not disclose their status before having sex if the other, presumably consenting partner is prosecuted and treated for attempted suicide for the same act.

Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Boo Radley on April 15, 2010, 09:35:52 pm
He knew he was HIV+ and slept with someone without telling them.  Essentially he took the choice out of their hands on whether or not they wanted to sleep with someone who was positive.  No amount of moral relativism can distance him from that statement.  Disclosure is all we have to protect ourselves from stigmatization.  Give someone else the decision to make instead of selfishly keeping the information to yourself and >potentially< putting them at risk.

"moral relativism" -- are you related to William F. Buckley, Jr., by any chance?

"protect ourselves from stigmatization?"  What dimension do you live in, Trey?  I'm very open about my status and being gay but there are tons of other people who, for reasons I may or may not understand or agree with, live in their HIV closets.  Many do so because they know they would be stigmatized by disclosing.  From personal experience I know once I disclose it's a 50/50 shot if the other guy runs off but I will always disclose no matter what happens.

My gay.com profile has always indicated my status.  I've never had a mancunt account.  I think anyone who hides his status in an online profile is a cowardly jerk.  What's the point of attracting someone if he's going to run off when you disclose in person?

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=30990.msg378549#msg378549 (http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=30990.msg378549#msg378549)

But that's only my belief, possibly not shared by others.

Since you only discovered your status when you were seriously ill in the hospital you clearly hadn't been tested in some time if ever.  How many people did you infect?  How many people did you kill?  Ignorance is no excuse.


P.S.  You might want to consult a dictionary for the definition of "moot."
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Hellraiser on April 15, 2010, 09:44:57 pm
Read the whole post, and you just went way too far.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Boo Radley on April 15, 2010, 09:52:28 pm
Read the whole post, and you just went way too far.

So sorry.  Why should I bother to read as much as might be relevant before making a conclusion?  You don't.

Put me on ignore with etay.  I can live without the ignorance and hubris of a 20 something.

People without minds don't matter, and minds without people are just matter...
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: jkinatl2 on April 15, 2010, 09:55:42 pm
So the only way to avoid being a jerk is to never get tested. Because anyone with an axe to grind can claim that a person never disclosed.

Problem solved. Well, except in California, where the lines are murky enough to disallow ignorance of one's status as an excuse.

Seems to me that the people who beat this particular drum the loudest are those whose own pasts hold acres of guilt and shame. It also leads directly into the "innocent victim" versus "predator" argument. In this way, it is strikingly similar to the oral sex transmission argument.

Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Boo Radley on April 15, 2010, 10:07:49 pm
So the only way to avoid being a jerk is to never get tested. Because anyone with an axe to grind can claim that a person never disclosed.
...

Hellraiser has the answer, Jonathan, but you must have missed it:

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=32166.msg394955#msg394955 (http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=32166.msg394955#msg394955)

"I'm actually kinda curious why they don't have some sort of mandatory testing for HIV.  Even if it was only once every 4 years (say with your driver's license) it would be a way to make sure everyone is being checked for the communicable potentially lethal virus."

I was too stunned to respond to such a brilliant suggestion.  How could anyone refute such logic?
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: jkinatl2 on April 15, 2010, 10:39:46 pm
Why not go one further, and publish test results each week in the paper? Like they do for divorces? Based on the logic that nothing beats the stigma more quickly than disclosure, then surely this is the ultimate answer.

Granted, a negative result is tricky, given current standards of testing. But it's a start!

Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 15, 2010, 10:42:37 pm
He knew he was HIV+ and slept with someone without telling them. 

True, but then most gay men that are sexually active and don't get an HIV test every six months are "almost" equally as guilty, wouldn't you say?
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 15, 2010, 10:44:41 pm

Put me on ignore with etay.  I can live without the ignorance and hubris of a 20 something.

The bourbon and pills always kick in around 9 PM, n'est-ce pas?
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Boo Radley on April 15, 2010, 10:47:21 pm
Why not go one further, and publish test results each week in the paper? Like they do for divorces? Based on the logic that nothing beats the stigma more quickly than disclosure, then surely this is the ultimate answer.

Granted, a negative result is tricky, given current standards of testing. But it's a start!

Typical namby-pamby bleeding heart liberal ideas... as much as I detest dirty, godless commies I think Fidel Castro had the right idea -- quarantine us all.    I think Carville is available since most of the lepers have left but we may need a bit more room.

I mean, if we're really serious about ending AIDS in the USA this is the only solution.  The Final One at that.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Boo Radley on April 15, 2010, 10:52:08 pm
The bourbon and pills always kick in around 9 PM, n'est-ce pas?

It's vodka, you dolt, and I'm trying to abstain.  I never take my psychotropics until bedtime.  So there, Miss Know-It-All.

I hope you soiled your new $300 DKNY jeans and Gucci loafers on the subway today...
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 15, 2010, 11:08:02 pm
DKNY? You couldn't pay me to wear that crap.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: tednlou2 on April 15, 2010, 11:26:35 pm
If I find myself back in the dating/sex scene, I couldn't have anal sex without telling the person my status--I'm talking about even when using condoms.  I couldn't let the guy suck me either without disclosing.  However, if I were sucking him only, I wonder if I would tell.  I have read the receptive partner (the suckee, if you will) of oral sex can get other STD's from the sucker's mouth, but virtually impossible to get HIV--unless I was bleeding to death all over his dick and he had an open sore. 

So, I would tell for all other sex, but probably wouldn't if I were the one performing oral on him.  Does that count as not disclosing when we should?  Maybe it does?? 
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Boo Radley on April 15, 2010, 11:27:29 pm
DKNY? You couldn't pay me to wear that crap.

Is that a double entendre?  You know my sole criterion for clothes is they be 100% cotton and under $25.

LaCroix, Versace, Gaultier, sweetie-darling.  Names, names, names!

"If the models get any younger they'll be chucking fetuses down the catwalk."
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Rev. Moon on April 15, 2010, 11:38:02 pm
your new $300 DKNY jeans


::faints::
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: WillyWump on April 15, 2010, 11:40:34 pm

So, I would tell for all other sex, but probably wouldn't if I were the one performing oral on him.  Does that count as not disclosing when we should?  Maybe it does?? 

Yes, thats a big sticking point for me.

Here's my thought process...If I disclose that im Poz chances are I wont be sucking dick with the guy in question. If I dont disclose and he finds out that im Poz somehow, how will that make me look? Or what if by some weird cosmic occurence sucking his dick turns into a commited relationship (lol, right), what then? I'm still not clear on what needs to happen regarding disclosure in this (me sucking) situation.

It's all to worrisome for me, perhaps I shall just become a celibate HIv+ Monk.

-Will
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Boo Radley on April 15, 2010, 11:48:13 pm
...
It's all to worrisome for me, perhaps I shall just become a celibate HIv+ Monk.

-Will

I'm way ahead of you on that front.  In 1 more year I'll qualify as a virgin again.  Well, more a spinster.

I've always disclosed even before we start kissing (and if a guy can't kiss I'm not interested no matter how hot he is -- call me Doris Day).

One time I disclosed to a guy who wanted me to start the festivities with a BJ but then he wanted to wear a condom so I developed a headache and escorted him to the door. 
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: tednlou2 on April 15, 2010, 11:50:03 pm
Yes, thats a big sticking point for me.

Here's my thought process...If I disclose that im Poz chances are I wont be sucking dick with the guy in question. If I dont disclose and he finds out that im Poz somehow, how will that make me look? Or what if by some weird cosmic occurence sucking his dick turns into a commited relationship (lol, right), what then? I'm still not clear on what needs to happen regarding disclosure in this (me sucking) situation.

It's all to worrisome for me, perhaps I shall just become a celibate HIv+ Monk.

-Will

I see your point.  If he found out I was poz and he turned out to be poz as well from someone else, I could see where he could say I gave it to him.  We've all been seeing many stories about people being prosecuted.  That brings up something else.  In a case where you do disclose, how would you prove you told that person if they got it from someone else or from you.  Do you need to video the disclosure process?  Sounds ridiculous, but it seems like there is a prosecution story every week.  How do they prove you didn't disclose to them?  In the cases where several people come forward saying you didn't disclose, I could see.  If it is just one person, it is their word against yours.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: jkinatl2 on April 15, 2010, 11:53:31 pm
Yes, thats a big sticking point for me.

Here's my thought process...If I disclose that im Poz chances are I wont be sucking dick with the guy in question. If I dont disclose and he finds out that im Poz somehow, how will that make me look? Or what if by some weird cosmic occurence sucking his dick turns into a commited relationship (lol, right), what then? I'm still not clear on what needs to happen regarding disclosure in this (me sucking) situation.

It's all to worrisome for me, perhaps I shall just become a celibate HIv+ Monk.

-Will

But didn't you read the breathless posts about the women who pre-chewed food for their babies? Oral transmission is not only possible, but LIKELY. As is KISSING, apparently. Forget the research and the long term studies. Forget the science. This is about reactionary supposition!

After all, to quote the departed but remembered Luke, there is not a scintilla of science to support the notion that saliva is harmless, that oral sex is a theoretical mode of transmission (at best) and that stigma will vanish as soon as we all 'fess up to our vampiric nature.

Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: GNYC09 on April 15, 2010, 11:53:53 pm
He knew he was HIV+ and slept with someone without telling them.  Essentially he took the choice out of their hands on whether or not they wanted to sleep with someone who was positive.  No amount of moral relativism can distance him from that statement.  Disclosure is all we have to protect ourselves from stigmatization.  Give someone else the decision to make instead of selfishly keeping the information to yourself and >potentially< putting them at risk.

yes.  "criminal negligence" it could be argued.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: jkinatl2 on April 15, 2010, 11:54:20 pm
I see your point.  If he found out I was poz and he turned out to be poz as well from someone else, I could see where he could say I gave it to him.  We've all been seeing many stories about people being prosecuted.  That brings up something else.  In a case where you do disclose, how would you prove you told that person if they got it from someone else or from you.  Do you need to video the disclosure process?  Sounds ridiculous, but it seems like there is a prosecution story every week.  How do they prove you didn't disclose to them?  In the cases where several people come forward saying you didn't disclose, I could see.  If it is just one person, it is their word against yours.

Videotape each and every encounter. its the only way to be sure.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: skeebo1969 on April 16, 2010, 12:01:05 am
 I couldn't let the guy suck me either without disclosing.  

So, I would tell for all other sex, but probably wouldn't if I were the one performing oral on him.  Does that count as not disclosing when we should?  Maybe it does?? 

Under Florida Law you could be prosecuted.  How flawed is that?  

 In a case where you do disclose, how would you prove you told that person if they got it from someone else or from you.  Do you need to video the disclosure process?  Sounds ridiculous, but it seems like there is a prosecution story every week.  How do they prove you didn't disclose to them?  In the cases where several people come forward saying you didn't disclose, I could see.  If it is just one person, it is their word against yours.

May sound ridiculous, but unfortunately it may be a safe bet.  If I was on the scene myself I would have a document notarized with the negative woman's signature perhaps, or just go the safe route like I did and only date positive women.

The law is definitely unfairly stacked against us, if I've learned anything over the last 5 years through observance it's that.  Some of these people are locked up without anyone becoming positive, done so simply cuz they didn't disclose.  
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: jkinatl2 on April 16, 2010, 12:05:37 am
Thank goodness, there is no personal responsibility for the poor IHV negative victims o us monsters! And I agree with the earlier. If INSERTIVE oral is considered a felony without disclose, then surely KISSING would be. And given that HIv can be claimed to spread through saliva, then any human contact would be a potential risk. Maybe that guy who sat in a puddle of liquid in Vegas a few years ago was right?

Maybe all HIV science is wrong?

Maybe we are, upon infection, monsters, and the rest of the world, potential victims?

I mean, if we are to follow this logic to it's obvious conclusion.

And it's not like I have a shred of evidence to the contrary, unless you ask :)

Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: tednlou2 on April 16, 2010, 12:27:41 am
Videotape each and every encounter. its the only way to be sure.

I guess to protect yourself, we should get out our cell phones and video ourselves telling the person and have them agree they know and the date of the video.  It does sound ridiculous and ruins the mood, but after reading those stories about HIVers being prosecuted, like Skeebo said, when no one even turned up poz, would make me worried if I were in the dating/sex scene again.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: leatherman on April 16, 2010, 12:30:25 am
when no one even turned up poz, would make me worried if I were in the dating/sex scene again.
sero-sort and date another pozzie ;)
then you can bareback to your heart's (or that other body part's) content  8)
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Hellraiser on April 16, 2010, 12:41:11 am
Thank goodness, there is no personal responsibility for the poor IHV negative victims o us monsters! And I agree with the earlier. If INSERTIVE oral is considered a felony without disclose, then surely KISSING would be. And given that HIv can be claimed to spread through saliva, then any human contact would be a potential risk. Maybe that guy who sat in a puddle of liquid in Vegas a few years ago was right?

Maybe all HIV science is wrong?

Maybe we are, upon infection, monsters, and the rest of the world, potential victims?

I mean, if we are to follow this logic to it's obvious conclusion.

And it's not like I have a shred of evidence to the contrary, unless you ask :)



Give it a break Mary, seriously.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 16, 2010, 01:41:17 am
Yes, thats a big sticking point for me.

Here's my thought process...If I disclose that im Poz chances are I wont be sucking dick with the guy in question. If I dont disclose and he finds out that im Poz somehow, how will that make me look? Or what if by some weird cosmic occurence sucking his dick turns into a commited relationship (lol, right), what then? I'm still not clear on what needs to happen regarding disclosure in this (me sucking) situation.

It's all to worrisome for me, perhaps I shall just become a celibate HIv+ Monk.

-Will

Just go in the bath house with a "kick me" sign on your back.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 16, 2010, 01:42:32 am
You queens give me serious fucking headaches with this continual disclosure hand wringing.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Boo Radley on April 16, 2010, 03:02:02 am
You queens give me serious fucking headaches with this continual disclosure hand wringing.

Oh shut up you diarrheal old queen.  Isn't it time for your Horlicks?  Snort a few klonies and leave us serious folk to our oh so serious discussions.  Gurlfriend... 
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: TabooPrincess on April 16, 2010, 06:07:34 am
I've not been in the situation yet but I don't think I'd disclose my status. It's my business and I'm choosing not to disclose.  But I would do everything possible to make sure the sex was protected and the guy wasn't at risk.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: darkerpozz on April 16, 2010, 06:39:02 am
I have to agree with Miss Philicia there does seem to be alot of overthinking the disclosure thing.Either you feel morally obligated to disclose or you don't. Let it go, don't judge, take a breath because some of us have a harder time disclosing than others. I truly think if it is such a big deal stick us on an island and allow us to freely fuck our brains out I refuse to worry anymore I hear it is bad for my t-cells. Plus if kissing becomes a problem then might as well call the police cause I ain't disclosing shit before I kiss cause if you can't kiss I can't trust you or want anything else...
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: mecch on April 16, 2010, 06:43:34 am
jeez this same kind of story comes up all the time in these forums.

If we are just thinking about the moral choices of the accused, remember, the NEWS IS INCOMPLETE:

we do not know if he and his ex were having safe sex.  we do not know if he was on HAART and undetectable.  We don't even know if the ex was informed or not - maybe the ex is on some revenge trip after a messy break up or o something.  And we don't know if there was transmission.

And these laws sorta suck, by the way.  but they have their advantages, as well.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Dachshund on April 16, 2010, 06:52:16 am
You queens give me serious fucking headaches with this continual disclosure hand wringing.

It's that post HIV infection morality that one acquires through infection.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 16, 2010, 09:07:02 am
It's that post HIV infection morality that one acquires through infection.

I swear I never got that back in the day... must be one of those post-HAART things.  Either that or nobody in NYC gave a flying fuck.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Hellraiser on April 16, 2010, 10:19:33 am
We do actually know that he didn't disclose and he also details why.  To summarize he states that he couldn't tell him with the threat that his partner might leave and tell other people he was positive.  No excuse in my opinion.  This guy was sleeping with him for at least a year and half the entire time being knowingly positive.  You guys can chide me for being newly infected or riding atop my moral high horse all you want, but I figure that the negative partner in this situation had a right to know what he was getting into, once his partner found out.  I do however agree that this should not be 30 year prison sentence worthy.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: mecch on April 16, 2010, 10:32:05 am
Hellraiser,

I agree with you its a jerky thing to do to a partner.

The other question is if should be criminal in states in which it is. Thats why we wonder if they were having safe sex.

I had a bf lie to me for 4 years, long before HAART, by the way. And we always had safe sex, and he never pushed for otherwise. But he lied, baldfaced to me many times.

So, when he told me the truth, I left him immediately.  I also forgave him pretty quickly, though I wanted nothing further to do with him. And I don't think what he did was criminal.  Just low.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: justus35 on April 16, 2010, 11:27:30 am
I think the bottom line is that everyone has a responsibility to protect yourself  , I got my transmission from my x lover ,and I should have protected myself and not leave it to anyone else , I mean personly I tell my partners that I am pos,but many people really dont know ,and trully  accidently pass it , then those like this man who knows and still passing it or exposing  to others is wrong ,and  needs to be punished but everyone please protect yourself and be responsible  ..thats all I am saying  ;D
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: skeebo1969 on April 16, 2010, 11:59:16 am
We do actually know that he didn't disclose and he also details why.  To summarize he states that he couldn't tell him with the threat that his partner might leave and tell other people he was positive.  No excuse in my opinion.  This guy was sleeping with him for at least a year and half the entire time being knowingly positive.  You guys can chide me for being newly infected or riding atop my moral high horse all you want, but I figure that the negative partner in this situation had a right to know what he was getting into, once his partner found out. 

No one is saying he shouldn't have.  All of us here support disclosure, look up just one of the people you are currently arguing with posting history and I can guarantee you will find proof of this.  Please don't take this wrong, I am typing gently here, but a lot of newly infected people have a difficult time accepting their responsibility in their own infection.  It's one thing to say you do, but it's sometimes difficult to in the beginning and to be honest... once again I'm saying this nicely, I don't think you've fully accepted your own part in your infection.  I know it was a huge problem for me...

  I do however agree that this should not be 30 year prison sentence worthy.

 And you are further along than I was, because I wanted them dead and buried under the jail.  How would any time spent behind bars help?  It kind of sends a message to the negative population, a false sense of security mind you, that people are going to disclose their status... never taking into account the person honestly may not know.  Each of these cases puts a red X on all of us, and consequently makes disclosure harder for many.

Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Moffie65 on April 16, 2010, 12:07:58 pm
I truly think if it is such a big deal stick us on an island and allow us to freely fuck our brains out I refuse to worry anymore I hear it is bad for my t-cells.

DONE!!!!!!

Purchase a one way ticket to Mexico, with a connection to Havanna, and your wishes can be accomidated.  ALL HIV+ people in Cuba are placed in camps, with huge fences around them, on the western part of the island; and locked up for life! 

Enjoy, your wish is already done! :P
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 16, 2010, 12:59:40 pm
ALL HIV+ people in Cuba are placed in camps, with huge fences around them, on the western part of the island; and locked up for life! 

That's actually not true anymore.  Poz actually ran a very thorough, good article on HIV life in Cuba sometime in the past couple of years, but I'm too lazy to go find the link for you.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Tim Horn on April 16, 2010, 05:40:52 pm
Keeping AIDS at Bay in Cuba (http://www.poz.com/articles/Cuba_HIV_Rate_2363_17096.shtml)

by Bill Strubbe and Karen Wald

Cuba boasts the lowest rates of HIV/AIDS in the Caribbean—if not the world. Should the credit go to the country’s early, internationally condemned policies aimed at stemming the spread of the disease? And what’s in store for this island nation now that its borders may reopen to Americans?

Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 16, 2010, 05:50:57 pm
Thanks Tim -- see, I do read that filthy AIDS rag when I'm having explosive-D Norvir sessions every day.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: skeebo1969 on April 16, 2010, 05:55:05 pm
Thanks Tim -- see, I do read that filthy AIDS rag when I'm having explosive-D Norvir sessions every day.

So you read them after you shit on them??  Hehe..
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: mecch on April 16, 2010, 05:56:33 pm
Issue has been know for 10 years already:

2001 Research on the reimergence of Sex Tourism in Cuba:

"The government is deeply concerned that this new
Cuban society will undermine one of the revolution’s
greatest achievements: its health care system. Cuban
health care officials worry about the impact that
prostitution and the increase in tourism will have on
the incidence of sexually-transmitted diseases
(Márquez, 2000). As countries around the Caribbean
suffer from AIDS epidemics, Cuba has remained almost
intact. Only .02% of the Cuban population is
afflicted with the virus. In Haiti, 190,000 people
(5.17%) and in the Dominican Republic 83,000
(1.9%) suffer from the disease (www.webster.edu).23

In the 1980s and early 1990s, Cuba took an aggressive
position to limit the disease. In 1986 the entire
blood blank was destroyed and replaced with new,
tested blood. By 1994, 96% of the population had
been tested for AIDS. Thirteen AIDS sanatoriums
were set up for afflicted patients. HIV patients are requested
to spend 3-6 months at these sanatoriums
where they receive medical care and counseling on
how to live with the disease. By 1999, only 577 people
had died of AIDS and 2142 were infected with
HIV (http://www.cubasida.net).

Over the past several years, there has been an increase
in new HIV cases. According to Doctor Jorge Pérez,
director of the Los Cocos sanatorium, gay men, who
constitute 56.3% of the afflicted population, are
more prone to contract the disease. The El Nuevo
Herald reported that many gay hustlers would have
sex upon request without a condom. One hustler
claimed that he would have unprotected sex, but
would charge $100-$150 for the added risk (“La
prostitución,” 2000).

The government relies on sex education and AIDS
awareness to stop the further spread of the disease.
Sex education is mandatory for students and begins
in 6th or 7th grade. Condoms are widely available and
very affordable."

PROSTITUTION AND SEX TOURISM IN CUBA
Charles Trumbull


Given how hunky a cuban gigolo can be, and the cheap price, maybe Cuba should have HIV travel restrictions.  Just kidding, but isn't this one of the reasons for the Cuban Revolution in the first place, that it was a mob-controlled immoral pleasure pit?

Back to the thread's topic:

What about prostitutes and johns.  Whats the disclosure ethics there?  I know two cute kids in my town who are positive and turn tricks without saying a word. 
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: GNYC09 on April 16, 2010, 06:24:42 pm
So you read them after you shit on them??  Hehe..
LOL!
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 16, 2010, 06:35:02 pm
I do read them on the toilet, but when you have lipo ass it really prevents you from sitting on the rim for longer than 3 minutes.  At least I won't be getting hemorrhoids from excessive potty camping like most old farts.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Matty the Damned on April 16, 2010, 07:23:24 pm
I do read them on the toilet, but when you have lipo ass it really prevents you from sitting on the rim for longer than 3 minutes.  At least I won't be getting hemorrhoids from excessive potty camping like most old farts.

You should get one of those inflatable rings ( :) ) for when you need to perch on the brasco.

MtD
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Miss Philicia on April 16, 2010, 07:47:39 pm
My parents tell me to buy a padded rim at Walmart, but I simply refuse to go that route.  Just like I refuse to buy padded underwear.  Anyway, flat asses are very in with the black skinny jeans hipster crowd in my trendy hood.
Title: Re: What a jerk.
Post by: Rev. Moon on April 16, 2010, 09:44:18 pm
My parents tell me to buy a padded rim at Walmart, but I simply refuse to go that route. 

Tres tacky.  Get it in pink.