Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 19, 2024, 06:52:54 am

Login with username, password and session length


Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 772787
  • Total Topics: 66296
  • Online Today: 290
  • Online Ever: 5484
  • (June 18, 2021, 11:15:29 pm)
Users Online
Users: 2
Guests: 225
Total: 227

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Do I Have HIV?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex  (Read 24577 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,931
Re: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex
« Reply #50 on: July 07, 2009, 06:41:19 am »


   I blame the condom companies for not making a product that is more enjoyable to use.
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,931
Re: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex
« Reply #51 on: July 07, 2009, 06:42:08 am »



  Sweeeeet second page woulda never figured!!!!
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline carousel

  • Member
  • Posts: 821
Re: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex
« Reply #52 on: July 07, 2009, 07:28:47 am »
Can the wife press charges to her husband for possibly putting her life at risk by getting shafted bareback by some piece of fluff?

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,931
Re: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex
« Reply #53 on: July 07, 2009, 07:44:57 am »


  Who knows she probably could, but she has to squeeze her way past the man on his knees at the front door begging her not to go public with it.   I know she has a strong case for palimony and alimony......  if they got any chitlens together!
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline carousel

  • Member
  • Posts: 821
Re: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex
« Reply #54 on: July 07, 2009, 07:52:23 am »
He sounds quite a catch, good moral fibre and all.


Offline Oceanbeach

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,564
Re: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex
« Reply #55 on: July 07, 2009, 08:04:44 am »

   I blame the condom companies for not making a product that is more enjoyable to use.

We have all seen the bumper sticker that has the words "use it" on a condom... I saw a truck today in San Francisco with the same condom bumper sticker only it said "no thanks"   ;D  Have the best day
Michael

Offline bobino

  • Member
  • Posts: 264
Re: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex
« Reply #56 on: July 08, 2009, 01:00:29 am »
Yes, this is important, maybe it was just BJs all round, or some hand jobs. In which case the judge, jury, police and public health officials should go get a few. The journos deserve to be denied the opportunity.

- matt


That's what I was trying to figure out, but the sound quality on the interview video was so poor, I think I may have missed a good bit of what the guy said.  But at one point, he definitely says, "I thought I was having protected sex . . . " and he's talking about the sex he had with the married guy.  So I'm wondering if maybe the married dude did something like fuck him from behind without a condom or something like that.  I'd like to know what the married guy told the police.

BTW, I like your new pic, Matt.  Very dashing.   ;D
Suivons les rivières
Gardons les torrents
Restons en colère
Soyons vigilants

Offline Ksurrina

  • New Member
  • Posts: 1
Re: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex
« Reply #57 on: July 14, 2009, 10:46:35 am »
There are two sides to a story but we need to always be conscious when having sex as HIV poz personnels.

Offline AboutToStart

  • Member
  • Posts: 134
Re: Man with HIV charged for unprotected sex
« Reply #58 on: July 18, 2009, 04:40:13 pm »
Just a couple of absurd points that come to mind regarding this criminalisation of non-disclosure:

1. Even if they have had PROTECTED sex - the HIV+ guy would still be comitting a crime. The law requires the DISCLOSURE of one's status to the other, whether the sex is protected or not;

2. Even if the married guy was poz himself - the HIV+ guy would still be commiting a crime. The law requires the DISCLOSURE of one's status to the other, whether his partner is poz or not.

My stand: the law needs to distinguish, between a poz guy who deliberatly goes on an infection spree (with the specific intent to infect) as opposed to random encounter between two consenting adults who might even never met before and def. cannot rely on each other's "word" as the sole need for taking basic universal precautions...
« Last Edit: July 19, 2009, 05:26:31 pm by AboutToStart »

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2024 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.