Author Topic: Supreme Court Rules Against Kentucky Clerk in Gay Marriage Case (Read 18768 times)

RobbyR · « **Reply #50 on:** September 15, 2015, 11:47:14 am »

I always find it funny how all these anti-gay bigots like Kim Davis sitting up there with her stupid nappy ass hair look like they need some gay in their life, no wonder they hate gays so much she looks terrible!

It's not about her beliefs, it's about following the law. If you don't want to serve black people too bad, it's the law. If you don't want to issue marriage licenses to gay couples too bad it's the law of the land. If you can't do your job bye. Resign. Yea she's an elected official, but that's not my problem. The Supreme Court made gay marriage legal. So she has to abide by it or get out the way period.

RobbyR · « **Reply #51 on:** September 15, 2015, 11:48:48 am »

Her deputy, Brian Mason, is issuing the licenses. Good for him. I find it highly ironic that Kim Davis is still at work but refuses to sign the licenses but Mr. Mason is actually doing his job. Interesting, don't you think? Maybe he should be County Clerk instead of her.

Joe K · « **Reply #52 on:** September 15, 2015, 03:44:12 pm »

Quote from: RobbyR on September 15, 2015, 11:47:14 am

I always find it funny how all these anti-gay bigots like Kim Davis sitting up there with her stupid nappy ass hair look like they need some gay in their life, no wonder they hate gays so much she looks terrible!

Hey Robby,

While I am opposed to Ms. Davis and her so-called religious convictions, you lose a lot of credibility when you attack her for her physical appearance. Her physical appearance has nothing to do with her convictions. When you attack her personally, you become no better than she is, why?, because you are demeaning someone, whom you do not know, simply based on their outward appearance.

While beauty may be only skin deep, ugly is to the bone.

Joe

RobbyR · « **Reply #53 on:** September 15, 2015, 04:17:40 pm »

Quote from: Joe K on September 15, 2015, 03:44:12 pm

Hey Robby,

While I am opposed to Ms. Davis and her so-called religious convictions, you lose a lot of credibility when you attack her for her physical appearance. Her physical appearance has nothing to do with her convictions. When you attack her personally, you become no better than she is, why?, because you are demeaning someone, whom you do not know, simply based on their outward appearance.

While beauty may be only skin deep, ugly is to the bone.

Joe

I'm not attacking her, geez, I'm stating the obvious, she's a bad person with an ugly heart. How do you think those couples feel who were turned down? And let's face it her hair is hideous. I'm just saying a fact. How am I demeaning her by stating the facts? No I don't know her personally nor do I want to, but she's clearly using the issue for her own bigoted agenda. Whatever. I'm tired of being attacked on here every time I state my opinion, peace out.

tednlou2 · « **Reply #54 on:** September 15, 2015, 07:35:52 pm »

It seems the Tide commercial was not produced by Proctor and Gamble. It's a spoof, but still funny. I was very suspect they would do a commercial like that.

As for Kim's hair-- I've heard many funny comedians say the last thing she needs to do is piss off the gays, because she needs some help. Of course, that uses stereotypes, which are true for maybe 50% of the gay population, I would say. That doesn't mean she's ugly, but she just needs a makeover.

zach · « **Reply #55 on:** September 18, 2015, 11:06:17 pm »

she wants whats coming to her, nailing herself to the cross

UPDATED: Kim Davis May Have Violated Court Order By Altering Marriage Form Charges Deputy Clerk

http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/davidbadash/breaking_kim_davis_disobeyed_judge_s_orders_by_altering_marriage_form_charges_deputy_s_attorney

tednlou2 · « **Reply #56 on:** September 30, 2015, 01:35:40 am »

I just couldn't believe this, and still wonder whether it is true. We know the Pope has not become pro-gay and especially not pro-marriage equality. I just can't believe he would make a point to meet with this woman. Out of everyone he could meet, why her and why get into this?! Her time with him could have been used to meet with someone following what he speaks so much about-- helping the poor, refugees, and the sick. I am really dumbfounded he would meet with her.

http://www.wdrb.com/story/30146675/lawyers-for-kim-davis-say-she-met-privately-with-pope-francis

Wade · « **Reply #57 on:** September 30, 2015, 06:43:06 pm »

Hopefully he went there to perform an Exorcism, maybe at this
moment her head is spinning around spewing green shit ....

bocker3 · « **Reply #58 on:** September 30, 2015, 10:42:01 pm »

Not sure why anyone is surprised that the Pope would meet with someone pressing for "religious freedom". Their stances are pretty similar. The only difference between this Pope and earlier Pope's is that he seems to be for treating people with more respect. However -- he is NOT changing church doctrine or teachings here. Francis is not "for" marriage equality and isn't ever going to be.

M

Jeff G · « **Reply #59 on:** October 01, 2015, 08:01:38 am »

Never trust a man in a dress unless his makeup is flawless.

RobbyR · « **Reply #60 on:** October 01, 2015, 10:58:34 am »

The fact that he would make a point and take the time to meet with someone who is so well-known as a bigot speaks volumes about what kind of person he really is. Just another pedophile-supporting fake hypocrite priest who "loves" everyone unless they happen to be gay. Bye, trick.

Jeff G · « **Reply #61 on:** October 01, 2015, 11:30:49 am »

Quote from: bocker3 on September 30, 2015, 10:42:01 pm

Not sure why anyone is surprised that the Pope would meet with someone pressing for "religious freedom". Their stances are pretty similar. The only difference between this Pope and earlier Pope's is that he seems to be for treating people with more respect. However -- he is NOT changing church doctrine or teachings here. Francis is not "for" marriage equality and isn't ever going to be.

M

I agree with this ... Big Whiff what the Pope thinks .

RobbyR · « **Reply #62 on:** October 01, 2015, 11:43:51 am »

Why doesn't he instead of wasting his time with Kim Davis make some time out his busy busy schedule of waving, & meet with people & hear about how were raped by pedophile priests? Just a thought.

Jeff G · « **Reply #63 on:** October 01, 2015, 12:25:20 pm »

Quote from: RobbyR on October 01, 2015, 11:43:51 am

Why doesn't he instead of wasting his time with Kim Davis make some time out his busy busy schedule of waving, & meet with people & hear about how were raped by pedophile priests? Just a thought.

He did meet with some of the victims of pedophile priest … so your prayers were answered.

RobbyR · « **Reply #64 on:** October 01, 2015, 03:13:19 pm »

Quote from: Jeff G on October 01, 2015, 12:25:20 pm

He did meet with some of the victims of pedophile priest … so your prayers were answered.

He may have met with them but he won't do shit about the ones that are still running around molesting people it's all talk no action as usual I don't get all the fuss over the pope he's no different than any of the others. And then to make a point to meet with Kim Davis, the postergirl for bigotry? Fake. If he wants to do something he should renounce his meeting with Kim Davis, call her out for the bigot she is, allow gay priests male & female to be ordained, and call for immediate prosecution and renouncement of all priests who are rapists.

Wade · « **Reply #65 on:** October 01, 2015, 05:13:07 pm »

Only my opinion.
I am glad he went home and took his hocus-pocus horse shit
with him. He has no business interfering in government affairs ,
especially not with something as important as this.
Wade

Almost2late · « **Reply #66 on:** October 01, 2015, 05:48:57 pm »

Before becoming an agnostic, I was a catholic.. My faith had changed after realizing the hypocrisy of many organized religions.. Although I do get and appreciate Pope Franks message of tolerance and "who am I to judge" philosophy, but I do realize it's politics..Pope Frank was made Pope for damage control reasons, to bring the sheep back to the church after the whole priest molestation scandal which hurt the church dearly.. Why else would they replace Pope Ben with Frank when Ben was still alive? Just my observation and opinion and not intended to offend the faithful.. The fact that Frank met with Kim secretly speaks volumes of how embarrassing and ridiculous a meeting this was, but they are in agreement on the marriage issue, no surprise there.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/09/30/us/county-clerk-kim-davis-who-denied-gay-couples-visited-pope.html?referer=&_r=0

Jeff G · « **Reply #67 on:** October 01, 2015, 07:20:14 pm »

Maybe in a gizillion years the church will evolve to get warm and fuzzy with LGBT thing but you know what ? They are not fine with it and will not be for many more lifetimes to come so know your own value and know your own truth and stop trying to get it from institutions that will never be OK with you . Most churches are losing relevance with people over these social issues anyway so its for certain in time the LGBT will outlive the hate and misunderstanding about who we are.

There are churches that accept LGBT so if that is important to you find one that loves you the way you are and not for who they condescendingly want you to be.

Joe K · « **Reply #68 on:** October 01, 2015, 07:37:47 pm »

Quote from: Jeff G on October 01, 2015, 07:20:14 pm

Maybe in a gizillion years the church will evolve to get warm and fuzzy with LGBT thing but you know what ? They are not fine with it and will not be for many more lifetimes to come so know your own value and know your own truth and stop trying to get it from institutions that will never be OK with you . Most churches are losing relevance with people over these social issues anyway so its for certain in time the LGBT will outlive the hate and misunderstanding about who we are.

There are churches that accept LGBT so if that is important to you find one that loves you the way you are and not for who they condescendingly want you to be.

^^^This.

Joe

tednlou2 · « **Reply #69 on:** October 02, 2015, 12:08:50 am »

I was talking to friends, who are Catholic. They wondered how much Francis knew about Kim and whether the ultra-conservative leaders in the church orchestrated this. He may have known full well who she is and really wanted the meeting. Who knows.

Then, I saw this article speculating the same.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a38440/pope-francis-swindled-kim-davis-meeting/

Jeff G · « **Reply #70 on:** October 02, 2015, 03:42:49 pm »

covering all the bases I suppose …

http://news.yahoo.com/vatican-popes-visit-davis-not-form-support-092505075.html

And in a new twist, the Vatican revealed that the "only real audience" Francis had in Washington was with a former student and his family, who later identified himself as Yayo Grassi, an openly gay Argentine who met the pope with his longtime partner and some friends.

The revelations turned the table on the narrative of Davis' encounter, making clear that Francis wanted another meeting to come to light: that of an old student and his "family," who happens to be gay.

J.R.E. · « **Reply #71 on:** October 05, 2015, 06:09:10 pm »

Law firm labeled hate group leading Kim Davis' crusade

http://news.yahoo.com/law-firm-labeled-hate-group-leading-kim-davis-150459549.html

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Kim Davis' lawyer stood onstage in a Washington D.C. hotel and pointed to a photo on the screen. It showed 100,000 people packed into a Peruvian soccer stadium, Mat Staver told the crowd, all there to pray for the Kentucky clerk battling against gay marriage.

The crowd erupted.

It wasn't true.....

GSOgymrat · « **Reply #72 on:** October 16, 2015, 11:31:40 pm »

I know this is late but I thought it too fun not to share.

https://youtu.be/14C3TZg6NQM

Forums Index

Welcome

Author Topic: Supreme Court Rules Against Kentucky Clerk in Gay Marriage Case (Read 18768 times)