Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 17, 2014, 11:30:13 PM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 620107
  • Total Topics: 46722
  • Online Today: 282
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: 16 down, 34 to go...  (Read 4259 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
16 down, 34 to go...
« on: November 21, 2013, 06:20:43 PM »
So, now that Hawaii and Illinois have joined the ranks accepting gay marriage who's next?

Ultimately I think the house of cards will fall with a Supreme Court ruling but wondered what you all thought about which states might come next in the mean time.
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline Jeff G

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 9,229
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2013, 07:08:30 PM »
Its a related issue . The sates that are making it hard for the military same sex couples to get their benefits by requiring them to go to a federal facility are unwittingly making the case for the courts to make same sex marriage a federal issue or remedy instead of the sates rights argument .

If the states keep skirting federal law and not recognizing all legal marriages across state lines then there is no other way other than the supreme court to do what the sates refuse and that's rule in favor for full civil rights for gays , lesbians and transgendered citizens .


Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2013, 08:22:24 PM »
Agreed.^ So no guess on state #17 in the mean time?

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/map_of_the_week/2013/11/which_states_allow_gay_marriage_mapped.html

My guess would be Oregon or New Mexico?
« Last Edit: November 21, 2013, 08:27:18 PM by mitch777 »
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline Jeff G

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 9,229
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2013, 08:26:29 PM »
Agreed.^ So no guess on state #17 in the mean time?

It wont be Alabama . What state do you think is next ?

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #4 on: November 21, 2013, 08:28:07 PM »
It wont be Alabama . What state do you think is next ?

see edit of last post. :) Or maybe Saskatchewan. That's a state right? :)
« Last Edit: November 21, 2013, 08:31:17 PM by mitch777 »
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 23,558
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #5 on: November 21, 2013, 08:37:21 PM »
Pennsylvania is the on state in the northeast that hasn't passed marriage equality -- mostly because only half of the state is culturally "northeast" -- the central and western parts are more Mid-West culturally. But we also have the most at-risk governor for 2014 elections and his approval numbed are the lowest of any governor, so he will definitely lose to a Democrat. Then the problem is that the PA legislature (General Assembly) has 253 members making it the largest state legislature other than New Hampshire (which doesn't really count because the state's population is smaller than the city I live in). So our legislature is automatically slanted towards rural districts, hence why we're behind our neighbors.

My guess would be for Oregon to be next, maybe Nevada. Pennsylvania's will happen due to some court decision so it's just a matter of having a strong case brought at some point.
"Ive slept with enough men to know that Im not gay"

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2013, 08:41:28 PM »
I also vote for Oregon next.   

What  do you vote for to be the first red state to swing? 
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2013, 08:45:12 PM »
I also vote for Oregon next.   

What  do you vote for to be the first red state to swing?

*court ordered*
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2013, 08:51:44 PM »
Pennsylvania is the on state in the northeast that hasn't passed marriage equality -- mostly because only half of the state is culturally "northeast" -- the central and western parts are more Mid-West culturally. But we also have the most at-risk governor for 2014 elections and his approval numbed are the lowest of any governor, so he will definitely lose to a Democrat. Then the problem is that the PA legislature (General Assembly) has 253 members making it the largest state legislature other than New Hampshire (which doesn't really count because the state's population is smaller than the city I live in). So our legislature is automatically slanted towards rural districts, hence why we're behind our neighbors.

My guess would be for Oregon to be next, maybe Nevada. Pennsylvania's will happen due to some court decision so it's just a matter of having a strong case brought at some point.

That's my take on PA. I get the feeling several states are in a similar boat.
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #9 on: November 22, 2013, 12:13:35 AM »
Oregon is a good bet.  But, we are running out of more progressive states.  So, that means a SCOTUS decision.  I just can't imagine having some states with it and others not doing it for 20, 30, 50, and never years. 

I am saddened Indiana repubs are trying to get the anti-gay wagon started again.  They are again proposing a ban.  The city council of New Albany, IN (across the river from us) passed a resolution tonight, calling for the ban to be stopped.  Purdue University has also called for it to be stopped.  I hope more cities let their voices be known.  They know they need a more progressive state (at least on this issue) to attract top people.  If you're married in CA or NY, who would want to move to Indiana or other states where their marriage wouldn't mean anything.  More and more gay couples have kids.  They would fear moving there would leave their kids unprotected.


Offline Theyer

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,050
  • I love buying Furnature.
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #10 on: November 22, 2013, 03:03:25 AM »
I read an article this week that used statistics to show left leaning ares where attracting like minded newcomers from right wing states and savers. The author saw this as further polarization off the USA . I will continue to search for it , if you know such an article please post it .
"If we can find the money to kill people, we can find the money to help people ."  Tony Benn

Offline marcmoral16

  • Member
  • Posts: 86
  • Me and my Partner
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #11 on: November 22, 2013, 03:23:05 AM »
Oregon is probably a good choice BUT

I think New Mexico will be next with the courts stepping in due to six counties issuing marriage license to same sex couples.

I predict 25 states will have legalized same sex marriage either through the courts or through state legislature by 2018

Or much sooner if the 2014 midterm elections help better people get in.

Favoriting this thread so I can either come back and stick my foot in my mouth 4 years from now or be so happy because everyone can experience the freedom of equality.

EDITED: Spelling
Tested Positive Jan 16 2013
CD4 119 6% VL 23980
Started Complera Feb 2013
March CD4 199 9% VL 1000
May CD4 255 12% VL 334
June CD4 284 15% VL 172
Switched to Stribild middle June 2013
July CD4 325 22% VL 51
October CD4 341 23% VL UD!!
Jan 2014 CD4 343 20% VL <20

Offline wolfter

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,028
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #12 on: November 22, 2013, 04:50:24 AM »
It won't be Texas.  I'd have to research to find links, but they're defying federal law regarding the entire issue.  Ohio, being a bluish/red state will probably be soon,
Judging someone does not define them, it defines you. 

True peace is not merely the absence of war, it is the presence of justice.

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #13 on: November 22, 2013, 08:09:28 AM »
What  do you vote for to be the first red state to swing?

All of them -- due to a SCOTUS ruling. 

None of them will rescind their Constitutional Amendments because those folks in favor (or more likely for many, don't care) about same-sex marriage don't have the numbers of passionate folks to come out and vote.  Those against it are more likely to vote. 

M
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 23,558
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #14 on: November 22, 2013, 09:32:45 AM »
fyi, Pennsylvania was never one of those states that past an anti-equality constitutional amendment years ago. However they did legislate against it. Also, this just happened this past Monday. And remember, PA was one of the few states with a Republican senator (Toomey) that actually supported EDNA several weeks ago.

So it will either be a court case, or passage of House bill 1647 to repeal PA's defense of marriage act (again, it was not an amendment). You have to remember how many years it took for any bipartisan action on this issue in New York state. The only reason it eventually passed was due to business leaders pressuring a small amount of Republican lawmakers in Albany, threatening not to fund their reelections and asserting that it was bad for business not to pass it (which is true).

So what is needed is similar corporate (local) business pressure in PA, from the likes of (liberal) Comcast CEO Brian Roberts and others in the Philadelphia region, as well as Pittsburgh. Roberts just held a huge fundraiser at his home in Philly just a couple of weeks ago, hosted him over the summer on Martha's Vineyard, and frequently golfs with him. Realistically I can see PA acting on this by 2016.
"Ive slept with enough men to know that Im not gay"

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2013, 10:37:27 AM »
All of them -- due to a SCOTUS ruling. 

None of them will rescind their Constitutional Amendments because those folks in favor (or more likely for many, don't care) about same-sex marriage don't have the numbers of passionate folks to come out and vote.  Those against it are more likely to vote. 

M

 Maybe,  Probably,  but I think one or two will do it before hand (I hope).  I  think Arizona or  Colorado or Nevada has it in them.   They are western  red and not southern red and there is a libertarian slant there. 

 When marriage equality passed here in Washington,  many of the pro gay marriage commercials on tv  were from republicans speaking how it's actually a  Republican issue to support it.   Granted that may not fly in a lot of places.


My partner and I got married this year. While we don't have any plans on moving I would like to be able to have the option odd livingin more than just 16  states.
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline weasel

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,588
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #16 on: November 22, 2013, 11:15:59 AM »

  I am surprised Nevada has not passed the bill yet  . But they did get their
  Pot legalized   :)

     I think a state like Oregon will be next .

                                                  Weasel
" Live and let Live "

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #17 on: November 22, 2013, 01:22:07 PM »
  I am surprised Nevada has not passed the bill yet  . But they did get their
  Pot legalized   :)

     I think a state like Oregon will be next .

                                                  Weasel

 Pot  is still illegal in Nevada ( Colorado and Washington legalized it).

 I'm surprised Nevada hasn't legalized marriage considering how much of their economy is based on tourism and people going to Vegas to get married.  You would think the economics of it would have persuaded then by now.   Especially considering how much$ you spend having a wedding.
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #18 on: November 23, 2013, 12:22:27 PM »
Speaking of Republican states.  Six states have refused to follow federal law and provide benefits to same sex spouses in the National Guard

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/11/us/texas-and-5-other-states-resist-processing-benefits-for-gay-couples.html?_r=0

One state, Oklahoma has gone so far as dropping ALL benefits for National Guard spouses (straight or gay) so they don't have to provide benefits for the gays.

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/11/19/2970531/oklahoma-national-guard/

F'ing Bigots
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 23,558
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2013, 03:50:33 PM »
Texas=LOL
"Ive slept with enough men to know that Im not gay"

Offline darryaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 450
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #20 on: November 28, 2013, 08:44:35 PM »
Its a related issue . The sates that are making it hard for the military same sex couples to get their benefits by requiring them to go to a federal facility are unwittingly making the case for the courts to make same sex marriage a federal issue or remedy instead of the sates rights argument .

If the states keep skirting federal law and not recognizing all legal marriages across state lines then there is no other way other than the supreme court to do what the sates refuse and that's rule in favor for full civil rights for gays , lesbians and transgendered citizens .

You are of course referring to Oklahoma where our horrid governor eliminated ALL military spouse benefits just so she could discriminate against same-sex spouses.  (Oh, just noticed that Bug mentioned Oklahoma as well.)

I hope you're right, and a federal remedy becomes law because in this ass-backward, bigoted part of the country a federal ruling is absolutely necessary for same-sex marriage to be recognized (I still hear the N-word regularly).

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #21 on: November 29, 2013, 10:18:04 AM »
While Texas and Oklahoma and the remain states of the 34 continue to allow their prejudice to run the show, the states that do allow marriage equality are seeing dollar signs.


http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2022357105_gaymarriagebusinessxml.html
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #22 on: November 30, 2013, 01:26:55 PM »
Oregon teen uses Bar Mitzvah speech to support marriage equality, by discussing what "traditional marriage" meant in the Torah.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/4363083

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #23 on: November 30, 2013, 03:48:36 PM »
Oregon teen uses Bar Mitzvah speech to support marriage equality, by discussing what "traditional marriage" meant in the Torah.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/4363083
Great kid! C'mon Oregon, you can do it!
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #24 on: December 19, 2013, 02:05:40 PM »
Number 17 is New Mexico. Today's ruling by the NM Supreme Court!  :)
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #25 on: December 19, 2013, 02:51:35 PM »
Oregon is probably a good choice BUT

I think New Mexico will be next with the courts stepping in due to six counties issuing marriage license to same sex couples.

I predict 25 states will have legalized same sex marriage either through the courts or through state legislature by 2018

Or much sooner if the 2014 midterm elections help better people get in.

Favoriting this thread so I can either come back and stick my foot in my mouth 4 years from now or be so happy because everyone can experience the freedom of equality.

EDITED: Spelling

Macmoral16 wins the pool.

Ok who's next? Ohio? Oregon? Arizona? Colorado? Florida? Mississippi!
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #26 on: December 19, 2013, 03:47:31 PM »
Macmoral16 wins the pool.

Ok who's next? Ohio? Oregon? Arizona? Colorado? Florida? Mississippi!

LOL!  I say Mississippi. 

The only other likely state is Oregon, right?  I'm trying to think in my head which states could do this soon.  I could possibly see Michigan.  I only say that due to Facebook data of the greatest number of profile changes to the red equality logo.  Michigan was pretty hot.  I realize that doesn't necessarily equate to getting marriage equality.  But, I could see Michigan making a change maybe in 5 years.  Those younger folks will be voting.  I think most (if not all) state supreme courts are posts for life, no?  Well, that will take longer to get governors to appoint judges, who do view this as the equal rights issue it is. 

So, I am left wondering when and if the U.S. Supreme Court will go broad.  We know many states would take another generation-- even 3 or 4 more generations in some. 

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #27 on: December 19, 2013, 05:25:44 PM »
Macmoral16 wins the pool.

Ok who's next? Ohio? Oregon? Arizona? Colorado? Florida? Mississippi!

Oregon.

btw bugs, I think I deserve at least an honorable mention. lol.
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #28 on: December 19, 2013, 05:46:40 PM »
Oregon.

btw bugs, I think I deserve at least an honorable mention. lol.

I'm sorry, I should have scrolled up more.

If we look at the 2012 electoral map.  The blue's left would be:Nevada, Oregon, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Colorado, and Florida (did I miss any?). 

It's really a toss up as to who's next with Oregon maybe with the advantage.



See the comparison between the electoral map and the states that permit the gays to get hitched?  Quite striking really.  I think it speaks volumes as to the social divide in this country.  Really, two countries.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2013, 05:50:58 PM by buginme2 »
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #29 on: December 19, 2013, 05:50:54 PM »
Well, the successful lawyers from the Prop 8 case have joined a challenge here in Virginia....  Would be very fitting if a VA case was the one the SCOTUS used to overturn all the same-sex marriage bans -- just like VA vs. Loving case did for the interracial bans.

However -- that would likely take a couple years, so let's hope something quicker happens.

Mike
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline denb45

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,051
  • "1987 Classic Old School POZ+"
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #30 on: December 19, 2013, 06:04:53 PM »
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/19/us-usa-gaymarriage-newmexico-idUSBRE9BI11E20131219

YAY!!!

now if i can get my VA ebenefits, and bob married me, he be set for life even after I was long DEAD  :D

EDITED TO ADD:  17 down & 34 to go......get me to the church on time  8)

DEN

HUGS
« Last Edit: December 19, 2013, 06:19:13 PM by denb45 »
"it's so nice to be insane, cause no-one ask you to explain" Helen Reddy cc 1974

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #31 on: December 19, 2013, 06:05:37 PM »
That's ok bugs. Just kidding.

I hardly consider some of those states "blue", more purple, so I would be quick to eliminate Florida, Virginia, and Ohio. Not really knowing the inner politics of the remainder too well I would still go with Oregon.

After Oregon and maybe a few more, my guess is that a case will be brought up to the Supreme Court to bring marriage equality to all. (in 2015 or the first half of 2016)

I'd much rather get this obvious conclusion over with so that the gay people in our country can focus more on HIV and how it affects our community and those elected officials that stand in the way.

PS- Mike, I hope you are right although I really don't care what state it stems from as long as it gets done.  :)
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #32 on: December 19, 2013, 08:58:25 PM »
That's ok bugs. Just kidding.

I hardly consider some of those states "blue", more purple, so I would be quick to eliminate Florida, Virginia, and Ohio. Not really knowing the inner politics of the remainder too well I would still go with Oregon.

After Oregon and maybe a few more, my guess is that a case will be brought up to the Supreme Court to bring marriage equality to all. (in 2015 or the first half of 2016)

I'd much rather get this obvious conclusion over with so that the gay people in our country can focus more on HIV and how it affects our community and those elected officials that stand in the way.

PS- Mike, I hope you are right although I really don't care what state it stems from as long as it gets done.  :)

Virginia is more blue than people think.  All 5 statewide elective offices (Governor, Lt. gov, Attorney General & both US Senate seats will be Democrats in Jan). Without gerrymandering, the Repubs would not have a majority in the House of Delegates or an 8-3 margin in the US House

Mitch - I am with you too, any case that does it.  The sooner the better

M
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #33 on: December 19, 2013, 09:47:48 PM »
Virginia is more blue than people think.  All 5 statewide elective offices (Governor, Lt. gov, Attorney General & both US Senate seats will be Democrats in Jan). Without gerrymandering, the Repubs would not have a majority in the House of Delegates or an 8-3 margin in the US House

Mitch - I am with you too, any case that does it.  The sooner the better

M

I think there are more states that are more blue than we think. It's up to those who live in them to make a difference when causes are just.

The victory of which you speak was won by a thin margin due to the ludicrous Republican opponents. I'm glad that common sense prevailed in any case, whatever the reason.

I still think Virginia is a purple state. Maybe one of the purplest  (yes, that's a word I think. :).) states in the country.

Time to mix the paint a bit more. You may or may not agree but I believe a heavy dose of cobalt blue is needed.  :)
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #34 on: December 19, 2013, 09:57:41 PM »
Virginia is more blue than people think.  All 5 statewide elective offices (Governor, Lt. gov, Attorney General & both US Senate seats will be Democrats in Jan). Without gerrymandering, the Repubs would not have a majority in the House of Delegates or an 8-3 margin in the US House

Mitch - I am with you too, any case that does it.  The sooner the better

M

I forgot Virginia.  Yes!  Virginia has really changed.  And, I totally forgot Colorado.  Those two are more likely than say Pennsylvania. 

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #35 on: December 19, 2013, 10:48:22 PM »
Unfortunately, Virginia will only join by order of the SCOTUS. 

To undo our Constitutional Amendment a bill would have to pass two legislative sessions before going to a referendum.  With the horrific gerrymandering in place, The republicans will continue to run the House of Delegates for years and years.  The Dems win the statewide "popular vote", but gerrymandering has concentrated them into just a few districts. 
So, unless we change how we draw districts, it ain't changing here except by the SCOTUS -- because we certainly aren't going to get the legislative branch to give up their power to keep power by picking voters.

M
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #36 on: December 19, 2013, 11:46:00 PM »
How is the Virginia Supreme Court stacked?  Do they seem to rule along political lines?  I actually would have to research how our Supreme Court rules.  There haven't been many big cases here that got much news.  I really should know more about ours-- whether they are considered politically divided or not.  It will give me some reading homework. 

It does make me wonder why no one has challenged our ban to our high court.  I think there are a couple suits in the works now, though. 

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #37 on: December 20, 2013, 04:22:07 AM »
Do your states have initiatives?  You don't need to wait for SCOTUS if you pass an initiative.  That's how we got pot legalized.  The people wanted it so we voted on it. 
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #38 on: December 20, 2013, 07:58:45 AM »
Do your states have initiatives?  You don't need to wait for SCOTUS if you pass an initiative.  That's how we got pot legalized.  The people wanted it so we voted on it.

We need an Amendment referendum - and, like I said above, that can't happen until 2 votes by the State Legislature to put an amendment to a vote.  Not happening.......
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #39 on: December 20, 2013, 12:49:27 PM »
Do your states have initiatives?  You don't need to wait for SCOTUS if you pass an initiative.  That's how we got pot legalized.  The people wanted it so we voted on it.

I believe that marriage is a right. An equal right. Rights should not be voted on by an initiative or it becomes a matter of popularity.
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline Jeff G

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 9,229
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #40 on: December 20, 2013, 12:55:23 PM »
I believe that marriage is a right. An equal right. Rights should not be voted on by an initiative or it becomes a matter of popularity.

I agree but those initiatives may be the key to unlock the door for those of us that are in states that will still deny us our rights 100 years from now given the choice . The supreme court will eventually rule in our favor and the states that's used initiatives and won are making it a bit easier for them to get to the conclusion whats good for same is good for all of us . I think .

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #41 on: December 20, 2013, 04:34:23 PM »

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #42 on: December 20, 2013, 05:03:28 PM »
I agree but those initiatives may be the key to unlock the door for those of us that are in states that will still deny us our rights 100 years from now given the choice . The supreme court will eventually rule in our favor and the states that's used initiatives and won are making it a bit easier for them to get to the conclusion whats good for same is good for all of us . I think .

I hear you but I don't believe the Supreme Court should not even be paying attention to initiatives in regards to rights. The two just don't mix IMHO. Rights are rights. Not something we as a country should ever put up for a vote. Lawsuits that have merit on the other hand... that is what just happened this summer and seems to be working pretty well. Major progress has been happening since. Another properly presented case will suddenly put an end to this discrimination and I think it will happen within a few short years.

31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #43 on: December 20, 2013, 05:06:59 PM »
I believe that marriage is a right. An equal right. Rights should not be voted on by an initiative or it becomes a matter of popularity.

I don't believe that the majority should vote on the rights of a minority either.  However, I was asking because of the statement that Virginia would have to wait until the courts forced the state to change their law.  I was curious if the people could force an initiative. 

I did some research and from what I found on Wikipedia, the initiative process is mostly a west coast thing.  Most of the east coast states do not allow citizen driven initiatives. 

Wow!  So much going on lately.  Federal judge strikes down Utah ban.

http://www.ksl.com/?sid=28099570&nid=148&title=utah-judge-rules-same-sex-marriage-law-unconstitutional&fm=home_page&s_cid=queue-1

Just a matter of time
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #44 on: December 20, 2013, 05:09:11 PM »
Wow!  So much going on lately.  Federal judge strikes down Utah ban.

http://www.ksl.com/?sid=28099570&nid=148&title=utah-judge-rules-same-sex-marriage-law-unconstitutional&fm=home_page&s_cid=queue-1

This is the way progress should happen. Glad to see Utah has judges that can think.

edited to add:

Btw- I do feel for those living in states with horrible chances of this becoming the law of the land. Unfortunately the path will eventually come down to a SCOTUS decision. 
« Last Edit: December 20, 2013, 05:14:46 PM by mitch777 »
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #45 on: December 20, 2013, 05:19:39 PM »
Can't the Virginia courts do the same thing, and not have to wait on the legislature or SCOTUS? 

I need to go back and review the California case.  Didn't prop 8 end up trumping the California Supreme Court?  If so, how does that happen?  I can see challenging a state court decision, but not an initiative ballot trumping it.  I need to go back and review that, because I could be wrong how things went down. 

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #46 on: December 20, 2013, 05:27:37 PM »


I need to go back and review the California case.  Didn't prop 8 end up trumping the California Supreme Court?  If so, how does that happen?  I can see challenging a state court decision, but not an initiative ballot trumping it.  I need to go back and review that, because I could be wrong how things went down.

Prop 8 was ruled as unconstitutional.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_8_(2008)
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #47 on: December 20, 2013, 05:34:48 PM »
I don't believe that the majority should vote on the rights of a minority either.  However, I was asking because of the statement that Virginia would have to wait until the courts forced the state to change their law.  I was curious if the people could force an initiative. 

I did some research and from what I found on Wikipedia, the initiative process is mostly a west coast thing.  Most of the east coast states do not allow citizen driven initiatives. 


Your first statement contradicts everything that followed unless I am somehow reading this wrong.
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #48 on: December 20, 2013, 05:43:59 PM »
Your first statement contradicts everything that followed unless I am somehow reading this wrong.

They are not mutually exclusive
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #49 on: December 20, 2013, 05:48:27 PM »
They are not mutually exclusive
Ok, help me understand. I'm not following.
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #50 on: December 20, 2013, 05:57:45 PM »
Ok, help me understand. I'm not following.

 I share the opinion that having a majority of people vote on a minority groups rights is inherently wrong.

The reason I inquired if virginia had the initiative process was because bocker mentioned that the only way virginia would legalize marriage would be from a court decision.  I wasn't advocating that they should vote on it, just curious if they had that option (which they don't, from what I found on Wikipedia). 

Which leaves a question...if your state can do a citizen driven initiative to put on the ballot a choice to legalize marriage should u do it?  What if your states legislature isn't moving fast enough to legalize or what if your courts are not taking up the issue?  Do you sit back and wait or do you do it yourself with an initiative? 
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline Jeff G

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 9,229
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #51 on: December 20, 2013, 08:35:44 PM »
There is something so satisfying about that ruling in Utah . It was the Mormon's and the wealthy empowered people of Utah that flooded California with money for the Prop 8 initiative . I bet they never thought this could happen on their own doorstep . 

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #52 on: December 20, 2013, 08:52:27 PM »
 
   Do you sit back and wait or do you do it yourself with an initiative?

You sit back and wait. You seem to state your belief that it is inherently wrong to have a majority vote on the rights of the minority and then you pose this question.

They ARE mutually exclusive concepts.

Thrilled about Utah for the same reasons Jeff.

31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #53 on: December 20, 2013, 09:48:31 PM »
I, too, agree that rights should not be voted on, but seeing as there is no federal right to marriage at this time - I would explore if, it was the fastest avenue.
I get that we shouldn't, but we DO - which is why my marriage is not recognized in VA.
I mean should Maryland and Maine negate their marriage equality because it was done by popular vote??
If only we could live in a world where this issue didn't exist, but alas, we do not (at this point, anyway).

Me
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #54 on: December 20, 2013, 10:42:22 PM »
Here is what confuses me and yet another reason I need to educate myself on how the federal justice system works. 

If a federal judge says their ban is unconstitutional, then why is Kentucky's still considered constitutional?  How can a federal judge decide one state's ban is unconstitutional, but that only applies to that state?  Does a federal judge have to rule separately on each state ban?  Would a judge need a case from each state?  One would think if one ban is unconstitutional, then they all are.  Is it left up to SCOTUS to rule on all states?  Is this just how it works and SCOTUS would have to make the broad ruling? 

Utah has appealed, but not before some already got their marriage licenses.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home3/57291925-200/ban-judge-sex-court.html.csp


Offline Habersham

  • Member
  • Posts: 317
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #55 on: December 20, 2013, 11:33:24 PM »
My law classes were a long time ago but here goes:

In each of these cases it is not the Supreme Court making the rulings but the Federal Circuit Court. Each of the Federal Circuit Courts can handle a few states. This is two steps below SCOTUS.

Someone with standing (two gay people who wanted to be married) had to bring suit that their rights were being violated at the local level and it moved through the state court to this level. Few cases ever get to the Supreme court level. Roe vs Wade is an obvious suggestion and that suit had to involve a pregnant women.

I would anticipate the states falling like cards after today's news....

Anyone who has can correct my murky thinking or has citations please do so. 
Because I Can

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #56 on: December 21, 2013, 11:50:39 AM »
I, too, agree that rights should not be voted on, but seeing as there is no federal right to marriage at this time - I would explore if, it was the fastest avenue.
I get that we shouldn't, but we DO - which is why my marriage is not recognized in VA.
I mean should Maryland and Maine negate their marriage equality because it was done by popular vote??
If only we could live in a world where this issue didn't exist, but alas, we do not (at this point, anyway).

Me

I don't want to belabor my point any further other than to say that I understand that in some states initiatives (popular vote) can be used to vote on giving or taking away peoples rights. I do not believe that it is a wise way under any circumstances to create law in that regard. I wonder if eventually someone will challenge this concept and bring a case to the SCOTUS?

I'm no constitutional scholar but it seems rights can be impinged upon much too easily by going down that road.

What's done is done in Maine and Maryland. I don't agree at all on how they got where they got. The idea of getting there by "any means" can come back to haunt us as a society down the road.

Initiatives are not always a bad idea but I think the line should be drawn when they pertain to an equal rights issue. There are better avenues to take.

I'm not looking for others to agree. Just my thoughts. :)
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #57 on: December 21, 2013, 12:57:47 PM »
Initiatives are not always a bad idea but I think the line should be drawn when they pertain to an equal rights issue. There are better avenues to take.

I thought about this a little more and the problem is, IMO, not that folks are voting on rights, but whether or not they are considered rights.  That is really the crux of the issue.  Too many people do not believe that marriage is a right -- just like too many do not believe that healthcare is a right.
I suspect just about anyone would agree that "rights" shouldn't be put to a vote -- the problem is agree on what are "rights" and what are something else........

So -- while the definition of something as a "right" or not goes on - initiatives are something that can be used -- just like a legislative vote (which shouldn't be needed for a "right" either).

M
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #58 on: December 21, 2013, 01:40:59 PM »
I thought about this a little more and the problem is, IMO, not that folks are voting on rights, but whether or not they are considered rights.  That is really the crux of the issue.  Too many people do not believe that marriage is a right -- just like too many do not believe that healthcare is a right.
I suspect just about anyone would agree that "rights" shouldn't be put to a vote -- the problem is agree on what are "rights" and what are something else........

So -- while the definition of something as a "right" or not goes on - initiatives are something that can be used -- just like a legislative vote (which shouldn't be needed for a "right" either).

M

Mike,

I agree. Rights are difficult to define. I guess I feel that initiatives are not being used as intended much of the time.

I found this that explains my position better.
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/A-long-way-from-the-grassroots-3190565.php

And this from Wikipedia was interesting as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initiatives_and_referendums_in_the_United_States

(funny, I live in a red state. lol)  :)
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #59 on: December 21, 2013, 02:42:31 PM »
Mike,
I agree.

We agree --- It's a Christmas Miracle........   ;D  just kidding.

Enjoy your nice warm weather -- I hear the cold comes back for Christmas.

Hugs to you and Keneisha......

M
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #60 on: December 21, 2013, 06:41:42 PM »
We agree --- It's a Christmas Miracle........   ;D  just kidding.

Enjoy your nice warm weather -- I hear the cold comes back for Christmas.

Hugs to you and Keneisha......

M

LOL. ;D

Hugs back to the both of you too!

m.
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline JMMich

  • Member
  • Posts: 16
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #61 on: December 21, 2013, 10:58:07 PM »
Here is what confuses me and yet another reason I need to educate myself on how the federal justice system works. 

If a federal judge says their ban is unconstitutional, then why is Kentucky's still considered constitutional?  How can a federal judge decide one state's ban is unconstitutional, but that only applies to that state?  Does a federal judge have to rule separately on each state ban?  Would a judge need a case from each state?  One would think if one ban is unconstitutional, then they all are.  Is it left up to SCOTUS to rule on all states?  Is this just how it works and SCOTUS would have to make the broad ruling? 


The federal judiciary has 3 levels: federal district courts, federal circuit courts of appeals, and the SCOTUS. Each state has at least one district, some have as many as four. The states are then grouped into "circuits" for the circuit courts of appeals. There are currently 11 of them (First Circuit, Second Circuit, etc.), plus the DC Circuit (covering the District of Columbia) and the Federal Circuit (which mainly does things like patent law).

A federal case starts in one of the district courts. A district court's opinion is never a "binding" precedent, i.e., no one else is bound to follow it. It affects the parties to the case only. However, it can be "persuasive" authority that other judges at both the state and federal level can cite to in support of their opinions (or to distinguish the case in front of them, etc.). So, right now, the Utah decision is binding on...Utah. Despite the fact that it makes findings based on constitutional principles.

When the State of Utah appeals the decision, it will go to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. That circuit covers Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, and Oklahoma. If the 10th Circuit upholds the decision of the judge from the District of Utah, and does so on the same/similar reasoning (i.e., constitutional basis), then the decision becomes binding on the entire 10th Circuit and any other bans in any of those other states would pretty much be history.

From the circuit courts of appeals, the next step is the Supreme Court. A party has to file what's called a petition for certiorari. If "cert" is granted, it means the Supreme Court will hear the case. If it is denied, then the decision from the court below stands, but still only covers that circuit. But it then becomes persuasive authority for other circuits. If another circuit (or circuits) has a conflicting ruling, it makes it more likely that SCOTUS will take one or the other of the cases so it can give a definitive ruling one way or the other with nationwide applicability.

The bottom line is that the district courts have somewhat more limited authority, because if every ruling applied nationwide there would be a whole lot of conflicting law; for example, you might have a judge like the one in Utah say that a ban is unconstitutional, while another judge in, say, Alabama, would be of the Antonin Scalia mindset and say there's absolutely nothing wrong with a marriage equality ban. If they both applied nationwide, which one do you follow? And then it would all just end up in SCOTUS's lap anyhow.

To really answer some of your other questions, then, it's going to have to be a piecemeal approach, unless/until SCOTUS finally rules on the merits. By which time hopefully one of Scalia/Thomas/Roberts/Alito has been replaced by a less ass-backwards justice...Justice Kennedy, while having written Romer, Lawrence, and Windsor, is just a bit too flaky to make him a sure vote for the LGBT equivalent of Loving v. Virginia. In the mean time, though, each one that goes down builds a stronger and stronger case that the remaining ones will go down, too. Here in Michigan, we have a challenge to ours that is going to trial early in the new year. The Utah decision is undoubtedly going to be prominently argued by the plaintiffs.

And, of course, this is all in contrast to the decision in New Mexico, which was from the New Mexico Supreme Court. They decided based on the New Mexico state constitution that marriage should be extended to all couples. And they could do so since they didn't have a ban in their constitution. So, unless there's an initiative to amend the New Mexico Constitution to put a ban in (and it passes), the federal courts won't be getting involved at all.

Hope that helps explain it a bit! Kind of a trip down memory lane to my first year of law school. lol
« Last Edit: December 21, 2013, 11:05:36 PM by JMMich »

Online Dan0

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Who's this Felicia and where is she going?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #62 on: December 22, 2013, 12:03:07 PM »
"You can't fix stupid....but you can numb it with a 2 x 4"

"I have standards! ....but....you'll probably meet them."

06/2002 DX
10/2006 Atripla
10/2013 Stribild

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #63 on: December 23, 2013, 06:51:06 PM »
The week began with hateful remarks toward gays and so much insensitivity toward black Americans.  I can't believe all the positive news since.  Judge rules on Ohio death certificate case. 

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/12/23/22023189-ohio-must-recognize-gay-marriages-on-death-certificates-judge?lite

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #64 on: December 24, 2013, 07:30:54 PM »
Breaking tonight on Christmas Eve--- Federal Appeals court denies state's request to stop marriages.  Merry Christmas Utah! 

Offline randym431

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,106
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #65 on: December 25, 2013, 04:25:00 AM »

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGyHCymzs0w

Now this is just plain nasty openly bigotry behavior.
It amazes me why anyone cares who gets married, when getting marriage is such a private personal decision.
It doesn't involve society, the town, the neighborhood, and especially strangers.
Like someone or some group telling you what color of car you can or can not buy.
Who really cares, really? What does it matter to them?
Bottom line... it doesn't.
This attitude of superiority over another, you can't have this because we own it, or you must have our permission and blessing before preceding, is plain ridiculous.

In this youtube from Utah (above), the clerk doesn't even know these women.
Never has known them before, and never will.
What the two women decided to do and when they decide is completely of no personal business to this clerk.
They get the license, they marry, they go about their private life. The end.
This clerk doesn't have to attend the wedding, nor would he be invited.
Other than maybe reading these two women's names in the news papers under "WEDDINGS MARRIAGES", this clerk will never again have any contact what so ever with the two women.
So it amazes me, and I have to ask this clerk, what is this to you?
Who made you the self proclaimed grantor of equality?
And why are you such a dick in the first place, fella?

Online Dan0

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Who's this Felicia and where is she going?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #66 on: December 27, 2013, 03:45:25 PM »
And leave it to Joe Jervis on his blog to find some levity and humor in the recent events! Sums it up perfectly!!

"You can't fix stupid....but you can numb it with a 2 x 4"

"I have standards! ....but....you'll probably meet them."

06/2002 DX
10/2006 Atripla
10/2013 Stribild

Offline Since2005

  • Member
  • Posts: 419
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #67 on: December 28, 2013, 12:15:42 AM »
This is funny picture. Thanks for sharing.

What an amazing ride in terms of marriage equality in USA. I am glad that I lived to see these days! May be one of these days, we can say 50 down, yes including Utah!!


Offline Hellraiser

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,110
  • Semi-misanthropic
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #68 on: December 28, 2013, 12:28:15 AM »
I never thought we would see Marriage Equality coming to fruition so soon.  I read an article where the author talked about the supreme court thought they might be buying some time with their first decision, but it looks like it might be back on the docket sooner than they thought.

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #69 on: January 14, 2014, 06:00:47 PM »
I'm sure many have already heard the news, that a federal judge ruled today that Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.  This does make me think it may not take another decade to have marriage equality the law of the land everywhere.  I may be too optimistic and naive, but this gives me hope things may change much sooner.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/14/oklahoma-gay-marriage_n_4598228.html

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 27,947
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #70 on: January 15, 2014, 08:42:38 AM »
The key to a happy relationship? Be gay. Or childless. Or make tea.

Gay couples are likely to be happier and more positive about their relationships than heterosexuals, according to a major study by the Open University published today.

However, they are less likely to be openly affectionate towards each other holding hands in public, for instance because they still fear attracting disapproval.

The study of 5,000 people 50 of whom were later followed up with in-depth interviews aimed at finding out how modern couples keep their relationships on track through lifes difficulties.
read more...


One comment on the article (from a gay man in a relationship) that I thought made sense was this: "Honestly, it seems to me that one of the more obvious factors is that men have more in common with men, and women with women. Why wouldn't it (generally, all things being equal) be more challenging to live with someone of the opposite sex?"

I'm reminded of being at my brother's home years ago when his wife did something particularly inexplicable (at least from a man's point of view). When I asked him about it, his memorable reply was You have no idea how lucky you are; Sometimes, it's like living with a different species.

Meanwhile, my partner and I are both marginal housekeepers with similar interests. We can even share ties and socks. And no kids*(!), which by any measure are a source of stress day-to-day, even if they are a blessing in the big picture.

I'm certainly not saying that there aren't millions of happy hetero couples. But it does seem to me that they have some inherent disadvantages right from the start that same-sex couples do not.


I think he may be onto something. What do you folks think?
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Online Dan0

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Who's this Felicia and where is she going?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #71 on: January 15, 2014, 11:24:59 AM »
I'm sure many have already heard the news, that a federal judge ruled today that Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.  This does make me think it may not take another decade to have marriage equality the law of the land everywhere.  I may be too optimistic and naive, but this gives me hope things may change much sooner.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/14/oklahoma-gay-marriage_n_4598228.html

The judge cited in his ruling that OK had one of the highest divorce rates in the country, so as much as that smug-faced Governor - Mary Falling - wants to cheerlead for family values, the data certainly doesn't support her claims.  Hysterical. 
"You can't fix stupid....but you can numb it with a 2 x 4"

"I have standards! ....but....you'll probably meet them."

06/2002 DX
10/2006 Atripla
10/2013 Stribild

Online Dan0

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Who's this Felicia and where is she going?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #72 on: January 15, 2014, 11:59:20 AM »
"You can't fix stupid....but you can numb it with a 2 x 4"

"I have standards! ....but....you'll probably meet them."

06/2002 DX
10/2006 Atripla
10/2013 Stribild

Offline darryaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 450
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #73 on: January 15, 2014, 12:11:40 PM »
I'm sure many have already heard the news, that a federal judge ruled today that Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.  This does make me think it may not take another decade to have marriage equality the law of the land everywhere.  I may be too optimistic and naive, but this gives me hope things may change much sooner.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/14/oklahoma-gay-marriage_n_4598228.html

It certainly says something that this is happening in two of the three highest-percentage Romney-voting states.

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 23,558
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #74 on: January 15, 2014, 12:15:56 PM »
If you take Nevada off the "divorce rates by state" list (for obvious "quickie-divorce" reasons) the top ten states are all conservative states. But they also have high marriage rates so really it just kind of means people in such places marry to quickly, or too young, etc. But you can't discuss divorce rates without factoring in economic status so that's why it's lower in a place like the Northeast.
"Ive slept with enough men to know that Im not gay"

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #75 on: January 15, 2014, 12:54:30 PM »


I think he may be onto something. What do you folks think?

Agreed.  As different as my partner and I are we still share a lot of commonalities by both simply being men.  It makes things much more convenient.  Besides if I ever need to borrow a shirt or pair of underwear I have much to choose from!


The marriage debate is over.  I just don't see how the fight can continue in these places.  My partner and I got married this year.  I'm just starting to get tax forms in the mail and have started about how and where we are going to get our taxes done. 

If we were to move to one of these states that's holding their breath and turning blue like a child, they are still at the end of the day going to have to deal with us.  What about taxes? What if we get a divorce? What if one of us gets hospitalized in Florida or Oklahoma?  They are set up for lawsuit after lawsuit and there no argument to deny.  It's already part of US law to recognize licenses from one state to another.

The fighting now is starting to look....sad.  Like someone forgot to tell them the war is over.
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Online Dan0

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Who's this Felicia and where is she going?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #76 on: January 15, 2014, 01:22:58 PM »
The problem is not the next two years, but the four years after that.  Eventually - I agree - that the tide will turn and this will be a simple chapter in history.  Meanwhile, you can rest assured that our Red State friends are banking on this being a wedge issue for SOME in the electorate and no matter whether the platform or party line agrees, disagrees or is non-committal, they CANNOT HELP THEMSELVES BUT TO COURT THESE crazy peopleVOTERS in 2016.

The asylum is in search of a delusional King (or Queen) now that Mr. Christie is doing his best impersonation of a fat lady singing. The visual alone is getting me through this Starbucks knock-off this afternoon. They are anxiously stacking up all the issues that whomever they choose as their candidate will be expected to battle!  Obama Care, Marijuana Laws, Imaginary Voter ID, and the horrible, nasty, contagious plague of GAY MARRIAGE (*gasp*).  You can bet that if my girl Hillary doesn't come through this time that their emboldened King or Queen will work feverishly to satisfy the asylum that elected them and start issuing all sorts of executive orders!  They have to pay back their base - whether they agree with them or not!

It is over. The tide is turning.  You can take to the bank that they are going to give it one more Hail Mary pass before they finally see the light, though.  They are persistant!

Of course, the prospect of Hillary vs. Paul or Ryan is hilarious.  She eats people like that for breakfast. And, hopefully, by then there will be another scandal with some closet-case Republican found looking through the louvers on their closet door.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2014, 01:31:00 PM by Dan0 »
"You can't fix stupid....but you can numb it with a 2 x 4"

"I have standards! ....but....you'll probably meet them."

06/2002 DX
10/2006 Atripla
10/2013 Stribild

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #78 on: January 17, 2014, 05:29:57 PM »
Many of my gays have been debating how this judge will rule on the KY case.  He was recommended by Mitch McConnell and appointed by Bush.  But, we've seen repub appointed judges be fair. 

Anyway, I just read where this judge ruled a state agency fired an employee based solely on sexual orientation, and that was unfair and unequal treatment.  So, a glimmer of hope. 

http://wuky.org/post/judge-rules-state-agency-fired-employee-based-soley-sexual-orientation

Offline Jeff G

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 9,229
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #79 on: January 17, 2014, 05:55:11 PM »
Many of my gays


Who are you Kathy Griffin .

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #80 on: January 17, 2014, 06:37:46 PM »
Who are you Kathy Griffin .

Ha!  That's who I was thinking of. 

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 27,947
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #81 on: January 17, 2014, 06:40:28 PM »

Many of my gays


Who are you Kathy Griffin .


Ted, I was wondering if you kept them in a hutch.

Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #82 on: January 17, 2014, 10:37:23 PM »
They have those ^^ at the clubs. 

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 27,947
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #83 on: January 18, 2014, 08:51:51 AM »
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #84 on: February 26, 2014, 06:24:15 PM »
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline bmancanfly

  • Member
  • Posts: 534
  • Medicare For All !
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #85 on: February 26, 2014, 06:33:42 PM »
There are a lot of soiled undies in TX right about now.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt."

 Bertrand Russell

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #86 on: February 26, 2014, 06:44:00 PM »
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #87 on: February 26, 2014, 06:56:40 PM »
Meanwhile today in Texas...

http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2014/02/federal-judge-voids-texas-gay-marriage-ban-though-he-delays-order-from-taking-effect-immediately.html/

(have you picked out your wedding dress Wumpellina?)

Texas will secede from the union and call back the confederate army before they allow the fags to marry. Put your dress back Wilimena
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline mitch777

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,033
  • wish i were here
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #88 on: February 26, 2014, 07:07:26 PM »
31 years hiv+ (oct. 2013) with a curtsy.

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #89 on: February 26, 2014, 09:44:32 PM »
The judge in the Kentucky case is due to give his final ruling tomorrow.  He already made the ruling a few weeks ago, which said KY must recognize marriages from other jurisdictions.  I still don't understand why that was just a preliminary ruling and we've been waiting for the final.  There was no stay, so that's not the issue. 

The judge says he will not include a stay, when he makes his final ruling.  The Attorney General is a Democrat.  He has been known in the gay community as being gay himself.  When he ran for Congress a few years back, against the then republican incumbent, issues of his sexuality came up.  He quickly got married to a woman who was seen as his "hag."  It was viewed that he did that to further his political aspirations here in KY.  Many believe he wants to run for senate or governor.  Whether he's secretly gay or not, I hope he does the right thing and not what seems best for his political aspirations. 

And, Eric Holder just told the state Attorneys General that they do not need to defend the bans, as they are discriminatory and unconstitutional. 


http://www.kentucky.com/2014/02/26/3109686/judge-final-order-requiring-ky.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/25/us-usa-gaymarriage-holder-idUSBREA1O0CG20140225


Offline WillyWump

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,017
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #90 on: February 27, 2014, 05:47:49 PM »
Texas will secede from the union and call back the confederate army before they allow the fags to marry. Put your dress back Wilimena

SCREW YALLZ ITS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME before I have the right to marry my 20y/o non-english speaking latino twink!

I'm flipping through a Modern Bride magazine right now :-*
POZ since '08

Last Labs-
6/25/13 CD4- 1036, UD,
2/4/13, CD4 - 489, UD, 28%
8/9/12, CD4 not taken, UD.
2/13/12, CD4- 904, UD 42%

Current Meds: Prezista/Epzicom/ Norvir
.

Offline Jeff G

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 9,229
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #91 on: February 27, 2014, 05:50:52 PM »

I'm flipping through a Modern Bride magazine right now :-*

As he flips through your wallet .

Offline WillyWump

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,017
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #92 on: February 27, 2014, 06:29:46 PM »
As he flips through your wallet .

It happened ONCE, years ago. ::)
POZ since '08

Last Labs-
6/25/13 CD4- 1036, UD,
2/4/13, CD4 - 489, UD, 28%
8/9/12, CD4 not taken, UD.
2/13/12, CD4- 904, UD 42%

Current Meds: Prezista/Epzicom/ Norvir
.

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,744
  • Certified Life Coach
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #93 on: February 27, 2014, 06:35:19 PM »
It happened ONCE, years ago. ::)

Hey if he's hot and Twinkie enuf I may hand over my car keys.

Ps. You don't marry those types Wilimena
"All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6e0gcEC1TWE

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #94 on: February 27, 2014, 09:46:03 PM »
I'm flipping through a Modern Bride magazine right now :-*

Make sure you skip all the white dresses dear -- you aren't allowed to wear that color, given your sordid past!!  Perhaps a nice "midnight black" -- yes, that will work.

 :-*

M
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline Jeff G

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 9,229
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #95 on: February 27, 2014, 09:51:51 PM »
Make sure you skip all the white dresses dear -- you aren't allowed to wear that color, given your sordid past!!  Perhaps a nice "midnight black" -- yes, that will work.

 :-*

M

I bet he will wear daisy dukes and flip flops and they will have coca cola with peanuts as  appetizers at the reception .




Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #96 on: February 27, 2014, 09:56:42 PM »
The final ruling came down here in KY.  The attorney general asked for a 90 day delay either to have more time to consider an appeal or to figure out how to implement.  Many think that was just cover for his future political aspirations and that he will not appeal.  The state did not get involved in the initial case.  However, the judge ignored that request-- so far.  Many think he felt the state had a chance to do that intially and that time had passed to cause a delay. 

Gay couples married in other states are now considered married here.  They can have their names changed if desired.  It also gives rights to property, medical decisions, taxes, and all that good stuff.

Offline wolfter

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,028
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #97 on: February 28, 2014, 08:56:12 AM »
The recent lawsuits filed in Ohio show a turn in tide here also.  Who would have ever thought KY or OH would even consider such actions.  :)

I remember my hot youthful days nights spent in the Vanceburg, South Shore, Portsmouth area of the Ohio River.  That was the hottest section of hot, horny, fuck anything guys that I've ever met.  AAH, such memories.  Probably why I'm clinging to that tall, skinny, shirtless, and dumber than rocks types of guys that still get my groin aching.
Judging someone does not define them, it defines you. 

True peace is not merely the absence of war, it is the presence of justice.

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #98 on: March 01, 2014, 12:08:36 AM »
The state asked for 90 days; the judge gave them 20.  Apparently, our attorney general is not delaying to decide to appeal, rather to figure out how to implement.  I think the Bush-appointed judge felt 20 days was more than enough time for that. 

The suit to get rid of our entire ban was filed on Valentine's Day.  I hope that moves quickly.  Oh, the tea-party guy challenging Mitch blames Mitch for this.  Mitch recommended this judge and Bush appointed him.  I am so glad for that.  People cannot say this is some Clinton or Obama liberal, activist judge.  Well, I'm sure they will and believe he must be a dem appointment judge. 

Online Dan0

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Who's this Felicia and where is she going?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #99 on: March 01, 2014, 12:55:06 AM »
http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/viewart/20140228/GPG0101/302280198/ACLU-wants-Wisconsin-gay-marriage-ban-blocked

Things are going so well around the country that the ACLU petitioned the court hearing the challenge to the Wisconsin ban to essentially LIFT the ban before the court date because of the 'likelihood they'll win their case'.

I doubt that will happen but you never know....
"You can't fix stupid....but you can numb it with a 2 x 4"

"I have standards! ....but....you'll probably meet them."

06/2002 DX
10/2006 Atripla
10/2013 Stribild

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #100 on: March 04, 2014, 05:40:30 PM »
Our Attorney General, Jack Conway, followed other states and said he would not appeal the judge's ruling.  He said he cannot defend a ban that is discriminatory.  He also said this would waste taxpayer money, as these bans are all going down.  Cheers to him for doing the right thing. 

However, our democrat governor, Steve Besher, immediately announced he would obtain outside counsel to appeal.  Our governor was looking so good and getting so much national attention for his implementation of ACA.  He just shit on that and I cannot understand why.  Many believe he did this, because he wants to run for Senate, after his term as governor ends.  It would seem he would have gone against "Obamacare," if he was that calculating.  Although, queers getting married is harder for folks to swallow than Obamacare.  Perhaps he is calculating and knew folks would come to love the expansion of Medicaid and the benefits of the ACA, so they would not hold that against him.  He is wasting taxpayer money, as these bans will all go down.

http://www.wkyt.com/home/headlines/Read--watch-Attorney-General-Conways-same-sex-statement-248381361.html?device=tablet

Modified:  Here is a news report that gives more insight into the governor's reasoning.

http://www.wdrb.com/story/24881042/ky-attorney-general-will-not-appeal-ruling
« Last Edit: March 04, 2014, 05:45:31 PM by tednlou2 »

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,258
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #101 on: March 04, 2014, 06:18:12 PM »
Our Attorney General, Jack Conway, followed other states and said he would not appeal the judge's ruling.  He said he cannot defend a ban that is discriminatory.  He also said this would waste taxpayer money, as these bans are all going down.  Cheers to him for doing the right thing. 

However, our democrat governor, Steve Besher, immediately announced he would obtain outside counsel to appeal.  Our governor was looking so good and getting so much national attention for his implementation of ACA.  He just shit on that and I cannot understand why.  Many believe he did this, because he wants to run for Senate, after his term as governor ends.  It would seem he would have gone against "Obamacare," if he was that calculating.  Although, queers getting married is harder for folks to swallow than Obamacare.  Perhaps he is calculating and knew folks would come to love the expansion of Medicaid and the benefits of the ACA, so they would not hold that against him.  He is wasting taxpayer money, as these bans will all go down.

http://www.wkyt.com/home/headlines/Read--watch-Attorney-General-Conways-same-sex-statement-248381361.html?device=tablet

Modified:  Here is a news report that gives more insight into the governor's reasoning.

http://www.wdrb.com/story/24881042/ky-attorney-general-will-not-appeal-ruling

The VA Attorney General is supportive of marriage equality, but appealed the recent ruling invalidating the VA Constitutional amendment in order to ensure a quicker, final ruling. 
Appealing isn't a bad thing, it helps to get a number of cases moving forward to the SCOTUS, forcing them to rule and, hopefully, striking ALL of these laws.

M
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #102 on: March 05, 2014, 12:37:08 AM »
The VA Attorney General is supportive of marriage equality, but appealed the recent ruling invalidating the VA Constitutional amendment in order to ensure a quicker, final ruling. 
Appealing isn't a bad thing, it helps to get a number of cases moving forward to the SCOTUS, forcing them to rule and, hopefully, striking ALL of these laws.

M

Brian and I were having this discussion tonight.  We were trying to give our governor the benefit of the doubt, and that he may have a good motive in this-- just like you said. 

Offline Jeff G

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 9,229
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #103 on: March 05, 2014, 09:55:19 AM »
If this is true ( big if ) then the Governors motives seem reasonable to me . Most people who lobby against equality almost always fall back on the its a states rights issue argument and resent the court system getting involved calling it activist judges and other catch phrases .     

Quoted from your link .
Gov. Beshear would not comment on camera, but in a statement said gay marriage is an issue for the U.S. Supreme Court. Beshear says employers, healthcare providers, and government agencies need a clear and certain road map on change, otherwise it could create chaos.

Online Dan0

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Who's this Felicia and where is she going?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #104 on: March 05, 2014, 10:38:34 AM »
This may take the wind out of their sails! 

http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/western-conservatives-urge-appeals-court-to-uphold-marriage

A group of very prominent Western State Conservatives including former Senator Alan Simpson (who has become somewhat of an elder statesman since retiring), Nancy Kassembaum (former Senator Kansas) and others have filed a brief with the 10th Circuit court asking them to stay the course on declaring the ban on marraige in OK and UT unconstitutional.  Their point is that there is support for gay marraige across a wide range of political spectrums. 

It will be difficult for conservatives to claim this as their own cause when significant parts of their establishment are braking with the perceived ranks! 
"You can't fix stupid....but you can numb it with a 2 x 4"

"I have standards! ....but....you'll probably meet them."

06/2002 DX
10/2006 Atripla
10/2013 Stribild

Online tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,602
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #105 on: March 21, 2014, 07:32:32 PM »
Breaking tonight-- Judge strikes down Michigan ban.  The plaintiffs initially were seeking to just give rights for both parents to adopt.  The judge invited them to challenge the entire ban.  The judge ruling in the Kentucky case basically did the same thing, saying he was just waiting for a case on that. 

It does seem like these federal judges were waiting for a glimpse into what SCOTUS would do.  They got that with DOMA and Prop 8, and Scalia's minority opinion that the SCOTUS ruling would legally open the door to this all over the country. 

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-courts/judge-rules-michigans-ban-gay-marriage-unconstitutional-n59116

Online Dan0

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Who's this Felicia and where is she going?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #106 on: March 22, 2014, 12:26:57 PM »



Wasting no time, several county clerks opened offices on Saturday to get the ball rolling! Tipped from JoeMyGod.

Wisconsin...surrounded by pro-marriage states (willingly or unwillingly) is standing out more and more like a hillbilly at a country club.
"You can't fix stupid....but you can numb it with a 2 x 4"

"I have standards! ....but....you'll probably meet them."

06/2002 DX
10/2006 Atripla
10/2013 Stribild

Online Dan0

  • Member
  • Posts: 215
  • Who's this Felicia and where is she going?
Re: 16 down, 34 to go...
« Reply #107 on: March 22, 2014, 03:20:50 PM »

And, WOW, I just saw this on the same site. Must have missed it. I've realized that the Episcopalian Church is a bit more progressive but I can't recall a time when I saw a missive from any organized religion not only applauding the "judicial activism" but clearly stating their support aside from a "this is how we feel" blurb.  Signd by four Bishops?  Impressive. 


"You can't fix stupid....but you can numb it with a 2 x 4"

"I have standards! ....but....you'll probably meet them."

06/2002 DX
10/2006 Atripla
10/2013 Stribild

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.