Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 20, 2014, 07:54:51 PM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 620591
  • Total Topics: 46759
  • Online Today: 273
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: 10 yrs no meds concern about inflammation damage  (Read 698 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline livingpos

  • Member
  • Posts: 30
10 yrs no meds concern about inflammation damage
« on: November 02, 2013, 03:30:22 AM »
Hi,

I have been positive for 10 years with stable CD4 IN 600 range, satisfactory CD4/Cd8% and a viral load that rollercoasters between 10k and 100k. While I feel fine and my tests are good, I have been reading about how the virus causes inflammation in the body and the damage this inflammation might cause. I have spoken to my doctor about whether it is worth starting meds but he says that besides the logic of helping the body deal with inflammation by reducing the viral load there is no scientific evidence that this is necessary.

Has anyone out there found themselves in a similar situation?

thank you.
Livingpos

Offline spacebarsux

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,350
  • Survival of the Fittest
Re: 10 yrs no meds concern about inflammation damage
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2013, 09:03:15 AM »
Yeah, I am in a similar position. Poz since 2005/06 (estimated date of infection), and still not on meds. Long term viral inflammation is definitely something to be concerned about, although it holds good that so far no study has conclusively proven a net benefit of commencing therapy with a CD4 higher than 500. Your doctor is right and mine said the same thing. But then many other doctors suggest starting meds asap. It's really up to you and what you feel comfortable with, together with your doctor's advice of course.

The latest WHO guidelines now also recommend starting therapy at a CD4 of 500, as do the DHHS guidelines- but they both say: "There is insufficient evidence and/or favourable risk–benefit profile to support initiating ART at a CD4 cell count  >500 cells/mm3"
Infected-  2005 or early 2006; Diagnosed- Jan 28th, 2011; Feb '11- CD4 754 @34%, VL- 39K; July '11- CD4 907@26%,  VL-81K; Feb '12- CD4 713 @31%, VL- 41K, Nov '12- CD4- 827@31%

Offline mikeyb39

  • Member
  • Posts: 881
Re: 10 yrs no meds concern about inflammation damage
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2013, 09:49:08 AM »
Well I can't give any advice on when you should start meds, I don't know what i'd do if I were in your shoes.

I didn't have the option to choose after I was diagnosed, but had to start meds right away, I started getting nerve damage in my feet and hands.  My doctor advised that inflammation is one of the key factors that causes neuropathy and nerve damage either sooner or later if not controlled.

He believes my nerve damage didn't start getting better until my VL was UD for quite a while allowing my nerves to 're-connect' from the inflammation damage.  Its a lot better, but not back to normal, I will always have some sort of damage that won't fix itself, and I feel it from time to time.

This may never happen to you, i'm just giving my scenario and what was told to me from the doctors.

Plus being UD helps with other folks you may be with to add and extra shield of protection for your partners or future partners if they happen to be negative.

That's just my two cents,  It would be nice to not HAVE to take them though, so I understand the dilemma.
11/02/2010  cd4-251, vl-591000
12/09/2010  started Atripla
02/18/2011  cd4-425, vl-800
06/10/2011  cd4-447, vl-70
10/10/2011  cd4-666, vl-80
01/05/2012  swiched med (prezista,norvir ,isentress, )
02/10/2012  cd4-733, vl-UD  Viread removed
06/10/2012  cd4-614, vl-UD
12/14/2012  cd4-764, vl-UD
09/01/2013  cd4-785, vl-UD
03/06/2014. cd4- 1078, VL-UD

Offline wolfthorn

  • Member
  • Posts: 85
Re: 10 yrs no meds concern about inflammation damage
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2013, 09:57:07 PM »
If you're talking about population based studies, I'd say there's no definitive evidence on when to start because people haven't lived long enough yet, but I think having a high viral load worsens cardiovascular risk and probably nerve damage as well. If you keep an UD viral load it's about being healthier in 20-30 years. Granted, medications have side effects as well-- something to consider if you're going to take them for the rest of your life (or until something better comes out;).

Do you think you'd take the regimen reliably? If so, I'd consider taking something. I think there is some wisdom in "an ounce of prevention = a pound of cure." 

If I were in your shoes I'd probably start, but as I was diagnosed with AIDS I have a sort of "would-have should-have could-have" perspective. 
7/10/13: Oraquick at Home (+)
7/11/13: CD4 <20, VL 286,000
7/26/13: Start Stribild, Bactrim, Azithromycin
8/13/13: CD4 64, VL 1194
9/11/13: CD4 87, VL 511
10/14/13: CD4 164, VL 34
10/15/13: Stop Azithromycin!

Offline tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,608
Re: 10 yrs no meds concern about inflammation damage
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2013, 11:15:31 PM »
This is something I am concerned with, as I count at least 12 years of infection and not on meds.  Have I had irreversible damage from holding off meds?  I hope not.  The issues I think about most are heart and other organ disease, and cancer. 

I just read an article about heart attacks and HIV, here on this site.  According to the study, HIV poz folks had a greater risk for heart attacks over neg counterparts and especially if CD4 dipped below 200.  When they discuss nadir CD4, I assume this means what your CD4 was and basically stayed at, rather than an artificial drop due to illness.  I had a drop to 171, but I don't think that applies, when they discuss nadir in studies?? 

Here's part of their summary and I am confused by the people on meds having a 50% increase.  I am awful at studies.  Is this due to the meds, or probably having had their CD4 below 500 and possibly less than 200, so they were more likely to be on meds?:

"After controlling for various factors, the researchers found that HIV on the whole was linked to a 44 percent increase in the likelihood of heart attack compared with HIV-negative controls. Those people with HIV who were taking antiretrovirals had a 50 percent increased risk of heart attack when compared with the controls.

Those HIV-positive people with either a current CD4 level below 200 or whose lowest-ever CD4 count dropped below this number had a respective 76 and 74 percent greater likelihood of heart attack when compared with the HIV-negative group. Those who never experienced a CD4 count at or below 500 had no greater risk of heart attack than the control group."

http://www.poz.com/articles/heart_attack_761_24748.shtml


Then, there was this recent article here how hardening of the arteries is linked to HIV infection of 8 or more years, REGARDLESS of treatment history. 

http://www.poz.com/articles/atherosclerosis_link_761_24735.shtml

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.