Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 22, 2014, 02:40:45 AM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 635579
  • Total Topics: 48218
  • Online Today: 214
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online
Users: 4
Guests: 175
Total: 179

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Understanding relative risk reduction strategies  (Read 690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline positivelynerd

  • Member
  • Posts: 33
  • Life isn't a struggle, it's a wiggle.
Understanding relative risk reduction strategies
« on: July 21, 2013, 04:41:13 PM »
In doing a little casual reading on PrEP effectiveness, I happened upon a very interesting slide show http://www.slideshare.net/JimPickett/project-rsp-training-on-prep-for-hiv-prevention-22798530 that had one graph that really stood out to me: 

Here, it's listed that TaP ranks higher in reduction of transmission than condoms for both hetero- and homo- sexual cohorts.  I admit I haven't looked at the references cited, but I found this to be a really mind-boggling flip in statistics.  I know that the 96% figure is for heterosexual couples in monogamous relationships with no concurrent STIs, but I was under the impression that condoms were 99% (maybe not 99%, but definitely higher than 70-80%) effective when used properly.  If anyone would care to shed light on this subject in the context of this graphic, this curious little critter would definitely appreciate it.   :)

(Edit)  I found a footnote referencing the discrepancy between my understanding and the graphic:

Condom Efficacy By Consistency of Use Among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in the US Condoms offer substantial but partial protection against HIV infection1Reported sexual behavior and condom usein 6-month intervalReceptive or Insertive Anal IntercourseEfficacyAlways use vs. Never use 69.7 %Sometime vs. Never use 4.4 %1. Smith DK, et al. CROI 2013; Atlanta, GA. Oral #322. Weller S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002:CD003255Analyzed efficacy of condoms in reducing HIV transmission inHIV-uninfected MSM who had anal sex with at least 1 HIV-infected partner from 2 USstudies (N=3490): VaxGen 004 and Project Explore1 
« Last Edit: July 21, 2013, 04:51:45 PM by positivelynerd »
5/25/12 Seroconversion
9/25/12 Diagnosed
10/12/12: VL- 799k, CD4 285
10/25/12 VL- 599k, CD4 274 
Started Sustiva + Epzicom
11/8/12: VL- 1790, CD4 412, 24%,
11/20/12: VL- 1470, CD4 350, 28%
12/19/12: VL- 584, CD4 293, 24%
1/16/13: VL- 411, CD4 404, 27%
2/13/13: VL- 314, CD4 523, 20%
3/13/13: VL- 171, CD4 404, 26%
4/10/13: VL- 96, CD4 397, 27%
5/8/13: VL- UD, CD4 422, 26%
6/5/13: VL- UD, CD4 462, 31%
7/24/13: VL- UD, CD4 559, 33%

"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed." -A. Einstein

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.