Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 22, 2014, 04:35:27 AM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
  • Total Members: 23515
  • Latest: Sevans
Stats
  • Total Posts: 639728
  • Total Topics: 48560
  • Online Today: 179
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online
Users: 4
Guests: 166
Total: 170

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs  (Read 13544 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« on: December 18, 2010, 07:57:53 PM »
Due to concerns around side effects, I've been taking a half dose of Truvada along with the full dose of my other medications which are Darunavir and Norvir, which I started just over 4 months ago. My viral load has recently dropped from over 100k to undetectable and my CD4 count is around 330, up from 80 when I first started. I've been monitored regularly and my doctor has been happy with the rate of progress.

I'm now considering taking lower doses of Darunavir and Norvir, but am undecided at this point. As Norvir is a 'booster' drug, it might perhaps make sense to keep that at its recommended level and just halve the dose of Darunavir.

So I'm interested to hear if anyone else has experimented with taking less than the prescribed dose of their HIV medication and what the outcome was.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Regretsafew

  • Member
  • Posts: 100
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2010, 08:14:47 PM »
I totally understand your concern with side effects.  But self dosing is not a good idea for any medical condition.  I would definately discuss your concerns with your doctor.  I know a lot of science goes into the recommended daily dosages on all medicines and there is a lot of testing before the drug is put on the market.  You may be risking resistance vs some side effects.  I would stick with taking your meds how they are prescribed.  I know its scary, but hang in there and there is  a lot of support here on this site. 


Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2010, 08:23:59 PM »
If the drugs are doing what they are meant to be doing - keeping the virus supressed - which is what's happening in my case according to my test results, then I can't see how resistance can occur.

There was another thread on here a while ago where someone was taking Atripla on alternate days (I think), and they appeared to be having success with that, by current clinical measures.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2010, 09:05:27 PM by Zohar »
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Inchlingblue

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,119
  • Chad Ochocinco PETA Ad
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2010, 09:02:39 PM »
Here is a thread that discussed this:

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=34941.msg434899#msg434899


There's also Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) which can tell you the levels of drugs in your body in order to adjust dose.

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2010, 10:26:53 PM »
So if we take a pool of ten people who do what Zoar does, and nine who don't, and Zogar screws up his regiment what does that tell you?
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2010, 10:35:25 PM »
What's your point Miss Phillipa?
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2010, 03:49:33 PM »
It's kind of evident and I'm sorry that you don't see it that way.  But hey, it's your body/
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2010, 06:30:37 PM »
It's kind of evident and I'm sorry that you don't see it that way.  But hey, it's your body/

??!!
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline J.R.E.

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Joined Dec-2003 Living positive, since 1985.
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2010, 07:23:32 PM »
Zohar,

I think it's dangerous, to be messing around with the dosing of your drugs, or by taking a less amount then is required, Unless you are under Doctor's supervision.Something you may want to google, is "TDM and HIV medications" ( therapeutic drug Monitoring)  It may give you some answers to your questions.


Ray
Current Meds ; Viramune, Epzicom, 40mg of simvastatin, 12.5mg of Hydrochlorothiazide.
Metoprolol tartrate 25mg



http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=40802.0

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=45159.0

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=39722.msg495621;topicseen#msg495621

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=46806.0

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=39414.msg491701#msg491701


 In October of 2003, My t-cell count was 16, Viral load was over 500,000, Percentage at that time was 5%. I started my first  HAART regimen  on October 24th,03.

 As of 8/2514,  t-cells are at 402, Viral load <40

 Current % is at 11%

  
 62 years young.

Offline J.R.E.

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Joined Dec-2003 Living positive, since 1985.
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #9 on: December 19, 2010, 07:27:14 PM »


Here's a link with some info:


http://www.thebody.com/content/art6033.html

Ray
Current Meds ; Viramune, Epzicom, 40mg of simvastatin, 12.5mg of Hydrochlorothiazide.
Metoprolol tartrate 25mg



http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=40802.0

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=45159.0

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=39722.msg495621;topicseen#msg495621

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=46806.0

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=39414.msg491701#msg491701


 In October of 2003, My t-cell count was 16, Viral load was over 500,000, Percentage at that time was 5%. I started my first  HAART regimen  on October 24th,03.

 As of 8/2514,  t-cells are at 402, Viral load <40

 Current % is at 11%

  
 62 years young.

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #10 on: December 19, 2010, 09:27:45 PM »
??!!

So if 10 people cut their truvada in half, and 1 has great lab numbers and the other nine develop resistance what does that tell you?  Do I really need to draw you a picture?
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline leatherman

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,201
  • Google and HIV meds are Your Friends
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #11 on: December 19, 2010, 10:07:02 PM »
...which I started just over 4 months ago. My viral load has recently dropped from over 100k to undetectable and my CD4 count is around 330, up from 80 when I first started.
am I reading you right? You've only been on meds for 4 month and just recently dropped to UD?

I wouldn't say that less than 4 months was anywhere near enough time to claim that your virus was "successfully suppressed". Maybe if you had kept your viral load suppressed for a year (or more!) then you could discuss with your doctor about cutting the dosage amt; but doing it this early in the game seems just entirely too risky.

Many people mistakenly quit taking their meds when they begin to feel better or when their numbers finally get better (ie cd4>200, VL = UD). Fortunately ARVs work great but they must be taken constantly to keep the viral suppressed enough to not be able to replicate.

by the way, what side effects are you worrying about? Side effects that you are currently having or side effects that you imagine you could have at a future date? If you're not having any side effects now, you're risking your health for something that might not even happen (check the package insert on your meds to see the low actual percentages of people who experience side effects). If you're having side effects now, you should speak to your doctor about doing something to deal with the side effects or about changing to another regimen.
leatherman (aka mIkIE)


chart from 1992-2013; updated 2/09/13  Reyataz/Norvir/Truvada

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #12 on: December 20, 2010, 06:19:31 AM »
''Many people mistakenly quit taking their meds when they begin to feel better or when their numbers finally get better (ie cd4>200, VL = UD). Fortunately ARVs work great but they must be taken constantly to keep the viral suppressed enough to not be able to replicate''.

You've misunderstood. I've not mentioned anything about 'quitting' my drugs and have no intention of doing so.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline leatherman

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,201
  • Google and HIV meds are Your Friends
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #13 on: December 20, 2010, 10:41:58 AM »
You've misunderstood. I've not mentioned anything about 'quitting' my drugs and have no intention of doing so.
Sorry, I think you misunderstood what I was driving at. Equating "feeling better" only 4 months into therapy as being a reason to reduce the dosage is of the same mindset as those who go off of meds for that same illogical reason. You may not think that your actions are in a similar vein but they are. Reducing the dosage this early in your treatment is as illogical as those who go off their meds because they feel better, or because they have already reached UD.

At 4 months, I don't think you can hardly say that you have had "successful" treatment. How long have you actually been taking this "reduced" dosage? Obviously less than the 4 months as that's how long you say it took treatment to get you to UD. I would suggest to you in the short time that you have been taking a reduced dosage, that you very well could have allowed the virus to be mutating, building up resistance.

You see, unlike some other meds where you can skip doses and still be "ok", it has been proven that being less than 95% adherent can lead to a point of the virus becoming resistance to the meds. Taking a half dose is much closer to 50% adherence than 95%. Still this early in treatment, this could all very well show up within the next 2 months of labwork. I hope not; but this problem could very well be underway.

Sadly, I have some experience with this kind of issue myself. Twice back in the mid 90s when the meds were much harsher and the side effects would literally destroy your quality of life (not a "concern" about side effects but the real thing), I slowly reduced my med dosage and eventually quit them all together (as a true quality over quantity of life issue), so I understand the mindset of "feeling better", of being concerned about side effects, and about going against the science and reducing the dosages. I also ended up in the hospital with an OI, extremely low cd4s, and skyhigh viral loads within 9 months each time. While I laid there, perhaps dying both times, I had to explain to a doctor why I thought I knew better how to "treat" myself rather than following the prescription.

I would probably have a totally different opinion if you were a year or more into treatment and had a trend, reoccurring labwork, proving your treatment was "successful"; but you really seem to be playing with fire at this point in the game. And please don't misunderstand my comments or tone. I say all of this out of concern. Taking antiretrovirals (chemotherapy) off-label is not something that should be done lightly, nor really by someone so early in their treatment. I am really gravely concerned that you may be causing a problem a lot bigger than any side effect that you might be concerned about.

However, you haven't yet given up any good reasons for your actions. Are you actually having side effects? Then you could ask to change to another regimen, or ask for monitoring as a doctor guides you through reducing the dosage. But if you doing this because you are worried about some future malady, then what if this action is what actually causes that future malady??

Of course, you can do as you please; but I would suggest that you get monitored more frequently over the next 3 months keeping a watchful eye out for any change in your numbers. I would also suggest talking to your doctor about this; but he'll probably just hassle you (as I have ;) :D ) to get back up to the correct dosage ASAP too. LOL
leatherman (aka mIkIE)


chart from 1992-2013; updated 2/09/13  Reyataz/Norvir/Truvada

Offline leatherman

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,201
  • Google and HIV meds are Your Friends
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #14 on: December 20, 2010, 10:56:54 AM »
going back and reading your history to try to learn more about you and your situation, I was very surprised to come across this less than a month ago:
but this is my third combination in a year so am trying to stick with it for now to see if they calm down.
going through 3 regimens in a year really does not equate to "successful" treatment at all. much less calling it successful in the 4th month of that 3rd regimen. You really should work on sticking to some regimen for at least a year to work out all the side effect problems (hives, lack of appetite, nausea, IRIS etc) that you've been going through, and to regain your health over some time, before trying something risky like taking an un-approved dosage of the meds. just sayin' ;)
leatherman (aka mIkIE)


chart from 1992-2013; updated 2/09/13  Reyataz/Norvir/Truvada

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #15 on: December 20, 2010, 01:11:42 PM »
Leatherman: Thank you for your posts. I noticed that you twice quoted  'feeling better'. I'm not sure why as this was not something that I'd said.  This, I have to say,  gives your response something of a 'straw man' feel.

Also, I did not say that 'going through three regimes in year equated to successful treatment'. My point was my current treatment has, thus far, been successful using standard clinical measures. I have been taking a half dose of Truvada since I started this regime and my viral load was shown to be falling  with each assay until it became undetectable in November. As I'm sure you are aware, the goal of HAART is to supress the virus to U/D levels therefore doctors would consider this regime to be 'successful' and, presumably, will continue to do so as long as the viral load remains at such a level.

This is obviously quite different to the  point you were at in the mid 90s where you experienced 'extremely low cd4s, and skyhigh viral loads' after abandoning your medication.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #16 on: December 20, 2010, 01:22:18 PM »
''Many people mistakenly quit taking their meds when they begin to feel better or when their numbers finally get better (ie cd4>200, VL = UD). Fortunately ARVs work great but they must be taken constantly to keep the viral suppressed enough to not be able to replicate''.

You've misunderstood. I've not mentioned anything about 'quitting' my drugs and have no intention of doing so.

so then be precise - what exactly are you saying?

Due to concerns around side effects, I've been taking a half dose of Truvada
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,946
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #17 on: December 20, 2010, 01:23:13 PM »
Do it!!! Let us know how it goes.

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #18 on: December 20, 2010, 01:42:34 PM »
Yes, great idea -- build up resistance to the one NRTI class med that's used with every HIV med combo these days.  It never ceases to amaze me how the new-to-HIV patients throw caution to the wind like it's as simple as eating a piece of meringue pie.
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,705
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #19 on: December 20, 2010, 02:53:13 PM »



   Isn't Truvada a time released capsule?  Not so sure it's a great idea for the long haul there Zohar... but hey if it's the short term effect you want, you got it.
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline leatherman

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,201
  • Google and HIV meds are Your Friends
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #20 on: December 20, 2010, 03:23:08 PM »
I noticed that you twice quoted  'feeling better'. I'm not sure why as this was not something that I'd said.
in your first post you said you were concerned about side effects, so I took you at your word that you were having side effects and by taking half the dose you were mislead by "feeling better" ie not having the side effect. Obviously since you won't talk about these concerns about side effects, I have to wonder if you actually have not been having any side effects, and have been concerned about something that hasn't even happened - and might not happen.

Also, I did not say that 'going through three regimes in year equated to successful treatment'. My point was my current treatment has, thus far, been successful using standard clinical measures. I have been taking a half dose of Truvada since I started this regime and my viral load was shown to be falling  with each assay until it became undetectable in November.
now, you tell us that you started this regimen on less than the prescribed dose. Do you not understand that these meds can work at that level - for a while. During the time they are working, your viral load will descend. Of course, until the virus finally starts mutating against the inadequate level to keep it fully suppressed and your viral load begins to ascend once again. Four months might not be enough time to temporarily suppress the virus, begin it's mutation, and raise the viral load.

You would think that having already gone through so many regimens that you would be following the dosing guidelines to the tee as you are quickly burning through the available meds. I'll tell you something else from experience, sitting around for months with no other available medication to take is a scary thing - and potentially deadly.

Also, I did not say that 'going through three regimes in year equated to successful treatment'. My point was my current treatment has, thus far, been successful using standard clinical measures
Barely reaching UD, and having gone through 3 regimens in one year is NOT successful treatment. No way, no how. Successful treatment is using one regimen to keep you UD for a yr or longer.

If your next labs show a blip up in the VL, then how successful will this regimen (half regimen, I should say) have been? HIV lab results should be considered over spans of time, looking at the trends. One lab of UD means nothing without surrounding equal results within a 2-3 month time span.

This is obviously quite different to the  point you were at in the mid 90s where you experienced 'extremely low cd4s, and skyhigh viral loads' after abandoning your medication.
well, i had thought I could make my advice have greater weight and sympathy, and be more palatable, by explaining how I could understand because in yrs past, I too took reduced dosages, went off meds, worried about real side effects (although I must admit the only side effect that I've really experienced with any of the 17 ARVs I've taken is throwing up - daily with many of the older meds) and had even hit a wall with no more meds available.

but who I am ;) to give advice to someone who starts their third regimen in one year (!!!) by cutting the dosages in half (to ward against non-existant side effects) and has barely spent any time at UD? You obviously know better than science, your doctors and the experiences of others, so I guess all I can honestly offer you now is to say "good luck and best wishes" with your potentially risky self-medication.
leatherman (aka mIkIE)


chart from 1992-2013; updated 2/09/13  Reyataz/Norvir/Truvada

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #21 on: December 20, 2010, 03:55:47 PM »
Yes, great idea -- build up resistance to the one NRTI class med that's used with every HIV med combo these days.  It never ceases to amaze me how the new-to-HIV patients throw caution to the wind like it's as simple as eating a piece of meringue pie.

Except that I'm not new to HIV.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #22 on: December 20, 2010, 04:01:23 PM »
back to the OP

There is current RESEARCH and trials about reducing the number of meds from typically 3 to 2 or even 1, in so called - maintenance therapy.

This is a very important issue in countries where ressources are limited and the number of people needing meds in increasing.

These studies includes those named : MONOI, OK04(2) , Monet

If interested, please look them up, not my field of interest at this point.

All these include replacement of tri-meds by one (or 2) PI. (either as first line or as a switch after being UD for a while)

So, while the OP is alarming, it may turn out OK. He is making a point.

I, personally would wait for those results...

Good luck and be carefull

Eric
« Last Edit: December 20, 2010, 04:04:58 PM by eric48 »
NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #23 on: December 20, 2010, 04:12:19 PM »
By the way, this paper, somehow addresses the issues of drug potency and dynamics:

http://www.iasusa.org/pub/topics/2010/issue3/104.pdf

I do not know what is the take home lesson of that part of the article, but I think it might be usefull to you in your quest.

Eric
NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #24 on: December 20, 2010, 04:46:58 PM »
Thanks for the info, Eric48..
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #25 on: December 20, 2010, 05:45:36 PM »
so what's your doctor say about what you're doing, Zohar?
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #26 on: December 21, 2010, 05:51:18 AM »
Would be interested in hearing from anyone else who's experimented with HAART dosage.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline phildinftlaudy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,965
  • sweet Ann what you think babe...
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #27 on: December 21, 2010, 09:54:27 AM »
I experimented with taking mine everyday as prescribed - in the dosage prescribed - and have just received my highest cd4 level counts since being diagnosed (740 with a cd4% of 41), undetectable VL and no side effects (other than the occasional hangover from having one too many Coronas).  I'm one of those daring scientists who really takes risks ---- naw, really I'm just a patient who believes in leaving the research and dosage prescribing to those with the experience to do so or to those who are okay with the potential consequences of playing the triple role of doctor/researcher/patient.
September 13, 2008 - diagnosed +
Labs:
Date    CD4    %   VL     Date  CD4  %   VL
10/08  636    35  510   9/09 473  38 2900  12/4/09 Atripla
12/09  540    30    60   
12/10  740    41  <48   
8/11    667    36  <20  
03/12  1,041  42  <20
05/12  1,241  47  <20
08/12   780    37  <20
11/12   549    35  <20
02/12  1,102  42  <20
11/12   549    35  <20

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #28 on: December 21, 2010, 12:46:19 PM »
Hi Zohar,

Do I understand correctly that you have initiated meds only recently ?

Side effect may take as long as a year to fade.

Also, if the meds work for you, the VL may keep going down well below 50 (eventhough 50 is the commercial limit of detection for most labs)
but that would take some time as well

Your gathering users experience on reducing dosage is legid to me. Jumping to do it yourself so early in the timeline should, IMHO, be considered with caution.

Once you have been UD FOR A WHILE (say a year...), why not ? you are the decider here.

As outlined in the paper reference I gave earlier it does not matter that the meds are Super super potent , or super potent , or simply potent as long as they are potent enough.

With PIs you start with a high potency index, so it may be less risky, but how less ?

and for what benefits ?

reducing side effects that would fade anyway ? reducing side effects that are worsening ? Do you have those ? Are they due to PIs or Truvada?

I'm interested in your findings and reasonning.

Cheers

Eric
   
NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,946
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #29 on: December 21, 2010, 12:54:20 PM »
You never say what side effects you are experiencing that are so terrible that you need to reduce your dosage.  I recently started meds and besides from some minor side effects it has been relatively easy.  What are you experiencing that is so bad you have decided to risk your health over?

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #30 on: December 21, 2010, 08:19:26 PM »
''it does not matter that the meds are Super super potent , or super potent , or simply potent as long as they are potent enough.''

This is what I find interesting. So presumably this means that a proportion of patients are taking a 'super potent' dose when a 'simply potent' dose would suffice.

As for side effects, it's more a concern over long-term issues which apply to HIV drugs in all classes.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2010, 08:21:22 PM by Zohar »
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #31 on: December 21, 2010, 08:45:29 PM »
presumably this means that a proportion of patients are taking a 'super potent' dose when a 'simply potent' dose would suffice.

got a link for this?
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Online mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,718
  • red pill? or blue pill?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #32 on: December 22, 2010, 04:30:18 AM »
really I'm just a patient who believes in leaving the research and dosage prescribing to those with the experience to do so or to those who are okay with the potential consequences of playing the triple role of doctor/researcher/patient.
ditto
ďFrom each, according to his ability; to each, according to his needĒ 1875 K Marx

Offline odyssey

  • Member
  • Posts: 765
  • One Crazy Mofo!
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #33 on: December 22, 2010, 10:50:45 AM »
''it does not matter that the meds are Super super potent , or super potent , or simply potent as long as they are potent enough.''

This is what I find interesting. So presumably this means that a proportion of patients are taking a 'super potent' dose when a 'simply potent' dose would suffice.

As for side effects, it's more a concern over long-term issues which apply to HIV drugs in all classes.

The doses recommended by the research and normally prescribed by doctors are the "simply potent" doses. Taking less is usually considered not potent enough, barring extreme circumstances. They do plenty of research into proper dosing when developing medications, it isn't something one should be messing around with without serious proper monitoring and advisement of a competent HIV specialist.

odyssey
01/09/09- diagnosed HIV+
01/16/09   CD4-425    22%  VL- 32,415
11/09- started Reyetaz/Norvir/Truvada
03/10- stopped R/N/T
10/18/11   CD4- 328   20%  VL- 84,000
10/25/11   CD4- 386   22%
10/28/11- start Truvada/Reyetaz/Norvir
12/30/11  CD4- 523  29%
03/08/12  CD4- 503  31%  VL 57
07/02/12  CD4- 897  43%
08/31/12  CD4- 745  39%
12/27/12  CD4- 884  40%
03/28/13  CD4- 819  39%
07/19/13  CD4- 739  40%
10/17/13  CD4- 535  36%
01/16/14  CD4- 743  43%

02/14- switched from R/N/T to Tivicay/Epzicom because of CKD 3 suspected from tenofovir.

03/14- switched back to R/N/T due to severe nausea and inability to eat on T/E.
 
04/01/14 CD4- 898  42%   VL-

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #34 on: December 22, 2010, 11:18:37 AM »

As for side effects, it's more a concern over long-term issues which apply to HIV drugs in all classes.

Why aren't you worried about the VERY possible long-term issue of developing resistance to Truvada, which would mean that most of the drugs in the whole class would be rendered useless to you?

What you're doing without the benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring is foolhardy in the EXTREME. You have been asked what your doctor thinks about what you're doing and you have ignored the question, so I can only surmise that he does not know and you have not told him because you know that he'd tell you off.
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline newt

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,885
  • the one and original newt
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #35 on: December 22, 2010, 01:42:10 PM »
In my considered opinion, with half dose Truvada plus a boosted PI the Truvada is doing nada, why not just go for boosted PI monotherapy, probably very kind to the body (and maybe protective against malaria)?

Less drugs is an admirable ambition, who wants to take shed loads of chemotherapy? But to my mind tis important not to cut off the nose to spite the face. I mean, resistance and rising viral load always complicates life, and I like it simple (and well).

- matt

(on boosted darunavir plus Truvada but considering dropping the Truvada)
"The object is to be a well patient, not a good patient"

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #36 on: December 22, 2010, 08:54:29 PM »
The doses recommended by the research and normally prescribed by doctors are the "simply potent" doses. Taking less is usually considered not potent enough, barring extreme circumstances. They do plenty of research into proper dosing when developing medications, it isn't something one should be messing around with without serious proper monitoring and advisement of a competent HIV specialist.

odyssey

And yet on the Poz forum blog, which was linked in this thread above, someone has written about taking Atripla one week on, one week off successfully for three years with their doctor's knowledge, so it doesn't seem to be quite as black and white as some would argue.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Inchlingblue

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,119
  • Chad Ochocinco PETA Ad
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #37 on: December 22, 2010, 10:45:46 PM »
And yet on the Poz forum blog, which was linked in this thread above, someone has written about taking Atripla one week on, one week off successfully for three years with their doctor's knowledge, so it doesn't seem to be quite as black and white as some would argue.

Not Atripla, I believe he's on Reyataz/Norvir/Truvada but yes, he takes them one week on one week off.

It  would be riskier to do that with Atripla due to Sustiva's half-life, although the FOTO study showed that "five days on, two days off" could work for some taking Atripla.

I believe that many of us are taking more meds than we should but it's risky to play around with it.

I'd like to simplify my regimen at some point and I think in the near future many of us will be able to, depending on one's resistance profile and treatment history.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2010, 11:03:03 PM by Inchlingblue »

Offline jkinatl2

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,007
  • Doo. Dah. Dipp-ity.
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #38 on: December 22, 2010, 10:51:35 PM »
I have tried playing around with dosing at times, myself. Got a little old, having zero energy and getting seriously odd, rare OIs that would only show up when I restarted my regimen.

It may take you years to get to that point. But the deterioration does not happen overnight. And it's shocking how when you sink slowly, you fail to notice until finally you are isolated, having forgone friends and social engagements, with barely enough strength to do the necessary - if that.

But if you are like me, you will have to find out for yourself.

Best of luck.

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

-Kimberly Page-Shafer, PhD, MPH

Welcome Thread

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #39 on: December 23, 2010, 01:19:47 AM »
And yet on the Poz forum blog, which was linked in this thread above, someone has written about taking Atripla one week on, one week off successfully for three years with their doctor's knowledge, so it doesn't seem to be quite as black and white as some would argue.

One week on, one week off, is a helluvalot different to taking a sub-optimum dose of two of your meds daily. You're just asking for resistance.

And as you admit, Shawn's (we know who you're talking about) doctor knew what he was doing. Does yours? Like I said earlier, I doubt that very much as you have studiously ignored the question.

Mate, it's your life. Risk resistance if you want, but I will not allow you to advocate it on my watch.
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #40 on: December 23, 2010, 06:19:09 PM »
Hi again,

Although not my field of interest I have followed up on Treatment Simplification here:


http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ClinicalTrials/Default.aspx

MONOI : A Randomized Multicenter Study With Non-Inferiority Hypothesis, Comparing the Availability to Maintain a Complete Viral Suppression by a Monotherapy of Darunavir/r to a NRTI Containing Regimen Including Darunavir/r, in HIV-1 Infected Patients With Previous Prolonged Complete Viral Suppression. ANRS 136 MONOI


OK 2004 Study : (Only Kaletra 2004 Study): Study to Evaluate Suspending Nucleosides From Triple-Drug Therapy in HIV Subjects

Official Title:    Phase III-IV, Comparative, Randomized, Open-Label, Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Suspending Nucleosides From a Triple-Drug Therapy Based on Lopinavir/Ritonavir Versus Continuing Triple-Drug Therapy in HIV-Infected Subjects With Undetectable Plasma HIV Viremia for Six Months

MONET:
http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00458302?order=0
Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir 800/100 mg Once a Day Versus a Triple Combination Therapy With Darunavir/Ritonavir

A Randomised, Controlled, Open-label Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg O.D. vs a Triple Combination Therapy With DRV/r in HIV-1 Infected Patients With Undetectable Plasma HIV-RNA on Their Current Treatments.

there may be others...

The question of treatment Simplification itself is legitmate.
Some people are risking their lives under strict medical control to find out if treatment Simplification is doable and if so under which circumstances.

The research is legit.

Research data and personal patient's experience are different stories.

The OPs, so far unsuccessful, attempt to collect personal experience from forum members with regards to this matter can not be ignored.

The facts are that the on going research on this treatment Simplifications has not been completed.

IMHO, the prudent approach, for those interested in treatment Simplification is to WAIT for those results.

Some trials come out with negative results (see once a day Raltegravir/Isentress, for example...)

The facts are that treatment failures or lack of treatment (mostly due to lack of $$) do end miserably

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=35784.0

is heartbreaking

I fully agree that the perspective that someone, with access to meds, with no urgency for taking less meds, would want to take that risk for fear of 'potential' long term SE
is inconceivable, at this point.

Side question: on a risk scale which one is the riskiest in 2010:
(among some personal decisions that are currently somewhat discordant with medical consensus )

- be HIV+ and postpone meds initiation
or
- self experimenting drug reduction

?

under incomplete meds, there is a risk to SELECT a 'potential' resistant strain/mutant.
under no meds , there is a risk to LET resistant strains/mutants come to existence (the fact that they stay under the radar, does not mean that they are not underlying...)

Just some thoughts...

Take care

Eric





 
NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #41 on: December 24, 2010, 11:10:25 AM »
Mate, it's your life. Risk resistance if you want, but I will not allow you to advocate it on my watch.


Ann - I'm not 'advocating' anything. I've asked for peoples experiences but haven't once suggested that this is what anyone else should be doing.

I believe that people have a very personal relationship with their medication - whatever it's being taken for - so it would go against my philosophy to promote any specific approach. People have to do what's right for them.
« Last Edit: December 24, 2010, 11:16:30 AM by Zohar »
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #42 on: December 24, 2010, 11:24:20 AM »

Ann - I'm not 'advocating' anything. I've asked for peoples experiences but haven't once suggested that this is what anyone else should be doing.

I believe that people have a very personal relationship with their medication - whatever it's being taken for - so it would go against my philosophy to promote any specific approach. People have to do what's right for them.

Fair enough, but I still think you're being foolhardy. And as you are still ignoring the questions about what your doctor thinks about this, I'm still assuming that you have not consulted with him about it. Also very foolhardy. But it's your life and your potential resistance profile.
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #43 on: December 24, 2010, 01:11:36 PM »
As an analogy, there are some people who don't believe in waiting to start treatment and that all patients with HIV should be on medication regardless of their CD 4 count and viral load and I've witnessed on these forums people being told they are 'playing with fire' for not doing so. This is not my view, but if someone wishes to start treatment 'early' then far be it from me to tell them otherwise.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #44 on: December 24, 2010, 01:24:44 PM »
I have tried playing around with dosing at times, myself. Got a little old, having zero energy and getting seriously odd, rare OIs that would only show up when I restarted my regimen.

It may take you years to get to that point. But the deterioration does not happen overnight. And it's shocking how when you sink slowly, you fail to notice until finally you are isolated, having forgone friends and social engagements, with barely enough strength to do the necessary - if that.


In what ways did you 'play around with dosing'?

You mention 'restarting your regimen', which implies you stopped taking your drugs at some point. Would that be correct?
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Jeff G

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 11,797
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #45 on: December 24, 2010, 01:34:18 PM »
Hi Zohar ... I have been following your thread because I once against my doctors advice altered the way I take my meds and it was a disaster for me .

I was wondering what does your doctor have to say about this subject or have you discussed it with him or her ?

Offline Nestor

  • Member
  • Posts: 430
  • What we love, we shall grow to resemble.
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #46 on: December 24, 2010, 01:39:03 PM »
Hi Zohar,

I've seen TDM mentioned here a few times--have you thought about trying it?  It seems like the best starting point for what you're trying to do.  
Summer 2004--became HIV+
Dec. 2005--found out

Date          CD4    %       VL
Jan. '06    725    25      9,097
Nov. '06    671    34     52,202
Apr. '07    553    30      24,270
Sept. '07  685    27       4,849
Jan. '08    825    29       4,749
Mar. '08    751    30     16,026
Aug. '08    653    30       3,108
Oct. '08     819    28     10,046
Jan '09      547    31     13,000
May '09     645   25        6,478
Aug. '09    688   30      19,571
Nov. '09     641    27       9,598
Feb. '10     638    27       4,480
May '10      687      9    799,000 (CMV)
July '10      600     21      31,000
Nov '10      682     24     15,000
June '11     563    23     210,000 (blasto)
July  '11      530    22      39,000
Aug '11      677     22      21,000
Sept. '12    747     15      14,000

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #47 on: December 24, 2010, 02:40:44 PM »
I've read a little about TDM too but not sure if it's something which is available on the NHS.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,386
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #48 on: December 24, 2010, 02:50:34 PM »
Hi Zohar,

I've seen TDM mentioned here a few times--have you thought about trying it?  It seems like the best starting point for what you're trying to do.  

He certainly won't be doing this....  From reading this thread it is clear that he wants no evidence that might point to his making a mistake in his approach.  He has his belief and he's going to stick with it -- even if it, quite literally, kills him.  Why do I say this?  If he won't even answer the question as to if his doctor knows what he's doing, then (as Ann says) it is safe to assume that his doc does not know.  Why isn't he telling his doc??  because then he would get some "evidence" that he shouldn't be playing with fire.  Sad really that he can't see that people here are actually trying to help him -- , it's not what he WANTS TO HEAR however............

At the end of the day -- it's his life, his choice -- he'll probably come back some day and ask if anyone has experience with dealing with a virus that is resistant to key drugs. 

Mike
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline newt

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,885
  • the one and original newt
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #49 on: December 24, 2010, 03:21:44 PM »
TDM is free on the NHS.

I agree, the relationship with meds is personal, but the virus' relationship with meds is chemical and it don't care what you think or feel.

It is highly likely a cut-down combo will work, but there are ways and means to do it, first of all come clean with your doc, he/she will want to find the best solution for you, ideally one that works. You won't be the first and certainly not the last he/she has seen with your reduced meds ambition.

And if a cut-down combo don't work then you can decide how you feel, about meds, life, yourself etc.

At the moment the half-dose Truvada is doing nothing. You are effectively on a boosted PI alone. This works often, why not just go for it?

Side effects are often in the mind, not the body, the drugs, depsite the reporting, are mainly not toxic, short term or long term. People like to think they are tho, but personally, I'd rather take combo than antibiotics or enough alcohol to have a hangover. It's kinder.

- matt
"The object is to be a well patient, not a good patient"

Offline Jeff G

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 11,797
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #50 on: December 24, 2010, 03:23:08 PM »
I'm used to seeing it now but it used to amaze me how a person can come into a forum and post a question expecting an answer while refusing to answer any thing asked of them .    

Next he probably will get angry at us for trying to help him by asking pertinent questions .  
« Last Edit: December 24, 2010, 03:59:40 PM by jg1962 »

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #51 on: December 24, 2010, 03:30:07 PM »
Newt said: ''TDM is free on the NHS''.

Thanks for that information, Newt. It's very helpful.  I will definitely ask my doctor about it at my next appointment.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #52 on: December 24, 2010, 03:54:23 PM »
And yet on the Poz forum blog, which was linked in this thread above, someone has written about taking Atripla one week on, one week off successfully for three years with their doctor's knowledge, so it doesn't seem to be quite as black and white as some would argue.

So if that person represents one story out of, say, a hundred and the other 99 all show resistance issues what does that tell you about your cherry picking of anecdotal bullcrap?
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline leatherman

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,201
  • Google and HIV meds are Your Friends
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #53 on: December 24, 2010, 05:15:33 PM »
Why aren't you worried about the VERY possible long-term issue of developing resistance to Truvada
Side effects are often in the mind, not the body, the drugs, depsite the reporting, are mainly not toxic, short term or long term. People like to think they are tho,
not to mention that by reading the package insert, literature and further studies, one can see that only a percentage (a smaller not larger percentage) of people usually have long or short term side effects. I'm not a gambler in the least but expecting side effects/long term issues seems like a very negative attitude to take towards one's medications, IMHO. Of course, some reports/studies have indicated that negative attitudes can lead to poor adherence issues. ;)
leatherman (aka mIkIE)


chart from 1992-2013; updated 2/09/13  Reyataz/Norvir/Truvada

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #54 on: December 24, 2010, 06:44:35 PM »
not to mention that by reading the package insert, literature and further studies, one can see that only a percentage (a smaller not larger percentage) of people usually have long or short term side effects.[/b] I'm not a gambler in the least but expecting side effects/long term issues seems like a very negative attitude to take towards one's medications, IMHO. Of course, some reports/studies have indicated that negative attitudes can lead to poor adherence issues. ;)

Yes, I agree that only a small percentage of people suffer side effects.

Unfortunately, I've been one of them.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline leatherman

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,201
  • Google and HIV meds are Your Friends
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #55 on: December 24, 2010, 08:06:02 PM »
Unfortunately, I've been one of them.
oh, I understand. I read through your posting history. ;)

Personally, I've only had a couple rashes and not much else in the way of side effects over the years. Oh, except for the terrible daily barfing everyday that caused me to totally quit and give up on the meds three times - which of course led to lots of problems (ending up in the hospital!) and resistance. I myself have gone through 15 or so ARVs searching for the right combo that would not only keep me alive, but be the right combo that I could actually live with (ie no side effects).

It was a long hard search too. It took me 10 yrs to reach undetectable and once I found an acceptable regimen (ie only barfing 6 times a month instead of 30 days a month), it took another 5 yrs to get through blips and reach a stable UD and stable cd4s in the 250-300 range. A pleasant "side effect" of sticking to the same regimen for these last 5 yrs (even though at first it still caused me to throw up occasionally), was that now that it had kept me stable this long, I have quit throwing up too! (that's only happened 3 times in the last 2 yrs now. WooHoo!)


you keep switching meds, right? switching to find a combo without side effects, right?
then it just seems that already "cheating" this newest regimen before it's even had a chance to produce the side effects :D seems counter-productive to finding out how well it will work for you and whether it will produce short or long-term side effects.

quoting you from a previous thread:
He *your doctor* seems to think that things will settle down in time and that it's worth sticking with this regime for the time being. I have to say, I'm not passionate about staying on these particular drugs, but given that I've experienced side effects on three regimes to date, there's a fairly high chance I'd have problems on other treatments.
see there's that negative attitude even back in Aug. :D Just because you have side effects on 3 regimes is NOT a predictor of having side effects with other regimens. ;) That's also the exact same advice my doctor gave me and though I didn't believe it at first and it took some time, his advice turned out to be right. ;)

It is troubling to read about how you have had to deal with so many side effects. If I knew the perfect regimen for you, I'd sure point it out. It's also troubling to read about how many regimens you've already gone through. Though it's not like the early days when one med wouldn't work and there wouldn't be any more on the market, that doesn't mean that there are an endless amount for you to "try" in finding a perfect fit. (Heck I thought I found my perfect one when it only made me puke 6 times a month LOL and look now! I never puke and I'm healthier than I've been in 20 yrs - and it only took me taking it for 6 yrs for things to get that good. LOL)

Maybe you, like me, will have to deal with nausea (or those rashes/dry skin/etc that you have had also) for several years while the meds keep you stable long enough for your body to reach the proper equilibrium. Not everyone takes meds for 4 months and then never has issues again. Since you've had so many issues with so many regimens already (and you think because you've had problems that you will have problems), maybe you should also consider, like I had to with the barfing, as to how many side effects can you put up with in order to stay on ARVs to keep the HIV in check to not die. I mean, untreated HIV leads to AIDS and that leads to death, so treatment to stay alive is a given. You may have to make a quality vs quantity of life judgment on how much you can handle.

I really do hope you find the right regimen for you; but I still think that not even starting this regimen at the recommended dosage wasn't the best way to do it, just to avoid side effects that you "might" have had from this regimen.
leatherman (aka mIkIE)


chart from 1992-2013; updated 2/09/13  Reyataz/Norvir/Truvada

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #56 on: December 24, 2010, 08:32:37 PM »
Thanks for that, leatherman.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #57 on: December 25, 2010, 07:22:17 AM »
Due to concerns around side effects, I've been taking a half dose ...

Hi,

So you think that SE come in proportion with dosage ?

Since you have not been very specific,  would not know. Some SE are alllergic reactions. Would dosage matter then?

Eric
NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline J.R.E.

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Joined Dec-2003 Living positive, since 1985.
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #58 on: December 25, 2010, 08:29:22 PM »
Hi,

Some SE are alllergic reactions.
Eric


UUmmmmm,... I don't know about that Eric.  There's a difference between having side effects, and having an allergic reaction.  At least, that's the way I always understood it :


http://www.ehow.com/how_5433813_differentiate-reaction-side-effects-medications.html
Current Meds ; Viramune, Epzicom, 40mg of simvastatin, 12.5mg of Hydrochlorothiazide.
Metoprolol tartrate 25mg



http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=40802.0

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=45159.0

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=39722.msg495621;topicseen#msg495621

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=46806.0

http://forums.poz.com/index.php?topic=39414.msg491701#msg491701


 In October of 2003, My t-cell count was 16, Viral load was over 500,000, Percentage at that time was 5%. I started my first  HAART regimen  on October 24th,03.

 As of 8/2514,  t-cells are at 402, Viral load <40

 Current % is at 11%

  
 62 years young.

Offline leatherman

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,201
  • Google and HIV meds are Your Friends
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #59 on: December 25, 2010, 11:19:39 PM »
There's a difference between having side effects, and having an allergic reaction.
http://www.ehow.com/how_5433813_differentiate-reaction-side-effects-medications.html
Quote
Then, this triggers symptoms of an allergic reaction, which may range from scattered hives , nausea and vomiting,or itchininess.
I disagree with that article. Hives, nausea, vomiting and itchiness can be temporary side effects OR long term side effects OR allergic reactions. the only difference can be the length of time dealing with the effect and/or the severity.

Ziagen and it's rash at 14 days, which is usually a side effect, is an example that comes to mind. For some people it's a temp side effect (as it was for me when I took it); for other people it is a severe allergic reaction and they have to immediately stop the med or risk death. The difference is the severity and the duration. In other cases many people vomit during the first few weeks as their bodies adjust to the chemical levels rising in their systems not as symptom of an allergic reaction.

frequently, with HIV meds, doctors instruct their patients to live with or deal with many of those listed effects for a short time period before being able to determine (by severity and duration) whether the symptom/issue is a side effect (short term or long term) or an allergic reaction.

I do think Eric is partially correct about what he pointed out. Those side effects Zohar is worried about having could actually not be side effects that a dosage change might effect; but could be an allergic reaction that he would have no matter what dose. Although even that premise is slightly flawed, as some allergic reactions can be mitigated with a lower dosage. (for example, a full dose of Bactrim causes me to have Hives as an allergic reaction to the sulfa drug; however a half dosage does not produce the same rash; but just mild itchiness - so a dosage change can make a difference)

of course, for all of these issues, I believe the guidance of a licensed, trained, experienced doctor (your doc or the ER doc) advising on the side effect (and knowing about the dosage change ;) ) is of utmost important to truly deal with these kinds of issues.
leatherman (aka mIkIE)


chart from 1992-2013; updated 2/09/13  Reyataz/Norvir/Truvada

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #60 on: December 26, 2010, 05:55:56 AM »
Hi,

Some posters have been wondering of Zohar had sought medical advise before reducing this daily dose of Truvada or if he has done that of his own accord.

Whichever...  It does not matter... he could just as well not tell us the whole story or not tell his doc the whole story. There may be some reason why he did not asked his doc.

Docs go on vacations, some go along well with you, some don't, some will give you time (mine does) , some won't.

Whichever...  It does not matter... Because the good news is that AT LEAST, he posted his question here. Let's do him the favor to try to understand the underlying issues here.

Some people simply drop the meds and drop off medical care (because the SE are unbearable), some people simply do not go on meds for fear of SE, some people go on the wrong meds for fear of SE (of the other choices)
At least, they find here a place to talk about it. Freely.

If he did reduce the Truvada dosage and thought it is a safe thing to do, why would he go further and consider reducing the dose of his PI  (and not that of the Truvada)? And if he did consider reducing the dose of his PI, why ask
doc or this forum for permission ? Why reduce the dosage of Truvada to start with (and why not the dosage of the PI)

May be he felt that it was 'safer' to play with the Truvada dosage First. We know, for almost certain, that he has played the Russian roulette before.

May be he felt that if the Truvada dosage did work on him (I am not implying that I think it did...) that was because the PI monotherapy ( a venue that has been explored and still being explored by some researchers)
(in my views, taking half a dose , 3/4 of a dose, 1/4 of a dose without proper monitoring equates taking no dose, at best) works for him (or, let's say has not yet shown failure)

And if so, then, the reason why it might have worked for him, is exactly because the PI was the pillar holding the roof of this little personal laboratory (himself).

This world is so much full of DO this, DON'T do that, that some people just start ignoring the warnings.

But as they keep playing the Russian roulette the stakes go up.

To the demise of the player

To the amusement of bystanders

Cheers

Eric

 

    
« Last Edit: December 26, 2010, 05:59:47 AM by eric48 »
NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #61 on: December 26, 2010, 10:56:00 AM »

To the amusement of bystanders
   

We are not amused.
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #62 on: December 26, 2010, 11:14:08 AM »
We are not amused.

(A quotation, attributed to Queen Victoria)

I suppose that is because we are not just bystanders.

Zohar: you got that ?  We are not amused.

Keep us posted on your on going thoughts

Eric

NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,386
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #63 on: December 26, 2010, 02:43:15 PM »
(in my views, taking half a dose , 3/4 of a dose, 1/4 of a dose without proper monitoring equates taking no dose, at best)

Unfortunately this isn't really true -- taking no dose will not cause the virus to mutate and become resistant, while taking a sub-optimal dose most certainly DOES run that risk.

Also, to be clear, Zohar does not need anyone's "permission" to do what he's doing, not sure where you pulled that from.  We are on here, not to judge, but to point out the danger.

Mike
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #64 on: December 26, 2010, 05:17:52 PM »
Agreed - Eric
NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline legolas613

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #65 on: January 15, 2011, 01:13:33 AM »
Zohar,
I have no experience trying this, however common sense tells me at some point in the not too far distant future you are likely to have resistance problems. If you are having problems with side effects, my own but less experienced opinion is:
(a) this should be discussed with your doctor before you begin to unilaterally alter and create your own dosages
(b) I know the combo pills offer the convenience of one pill a day dosing however maybe you should consider taking a drug that requires you to take it twice a day or you can try to space out the doses of you meds as opposed to taking them at the same time. The only problem with doing it like this is it increases ones chance of missing doses because of the more variances added to the times one take meds. For example, I am taking intellence which is 2 pills a day twelve hours apart and Epivir which is available in a once a day 300mg pill or twice a day 150mg pill. I opted for the lower dose and spread them out 12 hrs. My regimen, which is not for just anybody cause it requires a strong level of commitment and effort to maintain, looks like this:
6am = intelence
10am = epivir
2pm = viread
6pm = intelence
10pm = epivir
I have yet to feel any side effects worth mentioning <knock on wood>

Also, I don't know if I'm right or not but I kind of get the sense you like to be in control of things around you. I am the same way in that I hate having decisions made for myself by others (doctors, etc). I found I had alot of energy after my diagnosis of being different, wanting more control but less comformaty. But I've learned to try to respect the medical guidelines set by health professionals and instead found something I could channel this creative energy towards and make it benefit my health. Vitamins! I'm not going to be a vita-pusher but it has done wonders for me over the past 2 months. The shear vitamin pill count (107) and cost /day ($17) would be considered well over the top to most and I would agree with them until the past few months when I dug in and studied these things. If you were to look at the vitamin regimen I built, you would see a dual & complete coverage of all the main vitamins & minerals. I designed it with the intentions of  giving my body the best chance to thrive during HIV treatment to help maintain my cholesterol, blood sugar, brain support, liver support, lower inflamation, bone and joint support, heart support, kidney and prostate support, a handful of amino acids and giving my body a variety of antioxidents to keep free radicals clear. I stayed away from virtually all herbs (except for Turmeric, Bacopa and Cinnamon) though as many of them are not as proven. Now add in 5 different dosage times for these vitamins a day to help keep all the supplements bio-available longer throughout the day and there you have it, something I'm extremely proud to have designed for myself. I even balanced between the 5 doses the supplements that block one anothers absorption and take 1 black pepper extract per dosing time to increase the absorbtion of all supplements.

Sorry to ramble on like that. Hopefully that helps, just don't play dr with HIV meds and work closely with your dr when wanting to make any changes to the prescribed and agreed upon treatment plan. Try to find something to channel your energies in, wheather that is a hobby, health and fitness, whatever works for you.
Best wishes!!!
Gary
« Last Edit: January 15, 2011, 01:51:08 AM by legolas613 »
2009 Oct -- infected.
2009 Nov -- seroconverted.
2010 Feb -- tested HIV+. 
2010 Feb -- CD4=457,33% VL/WBC=3.8k/4.4
2010 Dec -- CD4=568,40% VL/WBC=3.6k/3.7
2011 Jan -- HLA B5071 test +; couldn't use Ziagen.
2011 Jan -- began Viread, Epivir and Intellence.
2011 May -- CD4=409,43% VL/WBC=UD/3.8
2011 Aug -- CD4=404,44% VL/WBC=8.8k/4.0
2011 Sept -- switched to Truvada & boosted Prezista. CD4 suppression, SE and adherance issues.
2011 Nov -- CD4=522,49% VL/WBC=2.3k/3.5
2012 Jan -- discontinued meds. SE and adherance issues, deciding on new regimen.
2012 Feb -- resistance testing revealed mutations: 3 NRTI (incl K65R), 4 NNRTI and 3 PI's.
2012 Apr -- CD4=599,41% VL/WBC=263/3.8
2012 May -- Shingles
2012 Oct -- CD4=493,36% VL/WBC=4.7k/4.4 (still my latest Dr. visit as of 2/01/2014)

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #66 on: January 15, 2011, 09:17:46 AM »
I fail to understand why you are spacing out your med intake.  What's the logic in this?
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #67 on: January 15, 2011, 10:45:18 AM »
I fail to understand why you are spacing out your med intake.  What's the logic in this?

If I'm reading him correctly, I think he thinks doing it his way decreases his chances of having side effects. I'm not so sure it works like that. With the combo he's on, he most likely wouldn't be having side effects even if he took them like most people do.
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline Inchlingblue

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,119
  • Chad Ochocinco PETA Ad
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #68 on: January 15, 2011, 11:25:31 AM »
If I'm reading him correctly, I think he thinks doing it his way decreases his chances of having side effects. I'm not so sure it works like that. With the combo he's on, he most likely wouldn't be having side effects even if he took them like most people do.

It might also not be side effects per se but the legitimate concern that long-term use of any of these meds can be hard on the kidneys and/or liver as well as other biological functions on the cellular level. It stands to reason that the smaller the dose the less of an impact on our bodies.  

The trick is to achieve that sweet spot wherein the meds are still working at keeping HIV at bay while having as minimal an impact on our bodies as possible.

No less of an AIDS activist than Larry Kramer has stated that he believes the recommended one-size-fits-all dosing of HIV meds is too high for many people.

There are advances being made, such as with nanoparticles that could possibly address this issue in the near future. In the meantime it's a bit of a crap shoot, especially without the use of TDM to help guide a decision.

I'd love to be able to take lower doses that still work but I hesitate to take the risk at this time.

LINK:

http://blogs.poz.com/shawn/archives/2008/08/paging_dr_larry.html

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #69 on: January 15, 2011, 11:32:38 AM »
It stands to reason that the smaller the dose the less of an impact on our bodies. 

He's not taking smaller doses. He's just spacing all his meds out throughout the day. He's taking the standard amount of Epivir for a 24 hour period, he's just taking 150mgs twice a day instead of 300mgs once a day.

By the way, you do understand that we're talking about Legolas's post, don't you?
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline Inchlingblue

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,119
  • Chad Ochocinco PETA Ad
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #70 on: January 15, 2011, 11:46:55 AM »
He's not taking smaller doses. He's just spacing all his meds out throughout the day. He's taking the standard amount of Epivir for a 24 hour period, he's just taking 150mgs twice a day instead of 300mgs once a day.

By the way, you do understand that we're talking about Legolas's post, don't you?

I didn't realize that. I don't fully understand what Legolas is doing nor why he's doing it either, lol.

I thought we were discussing the merits of wanting to take less medication, which is what the OP is doing or wanting to do.

In the words of Emily Litella, "nevermind."

LINK:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3FnpaWQJO0

Offline legolas613

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #71 on: January 15, 2011, 05:14:09 PM »
It might also not be side effects per se but the legitimate concern that long-term use of any of these meds can be hard on the kidneys and/or liver as well as other biological functions on the cellular level. It stands to reason that the smaller the dose the less of an impact on our bodies.

Hello,
I space my meds for 2 reasons:
(a) it makes logical sense to me that doses of any kind let alone HIV meds stand to be more tollerable if taken in smaller doses (if possible) and their intake spread over a timeframe to still accomplish the required daily intake. For example if your doctor said he wanted you to take 12 aspirin a day, would you take them in smaller doses throughout the day or all at once? Which method of intake would cause less strain on internal organs? Obviously 12 aspirin at once is illogical but it is the max safe dose/day. I'm just trying to make the point by breaking up the dosages of aspirin (makes sense the same would apply to any other medicine) into smaller amounts but multiple times a day to meet the needed total intake can be less stressful to internal organs yet should be just as effective in accomplishing the goal.

(b) it fits perfectly with the vitamin regimen I was already doing before I started meds; 5 time slots to take my vitamins/supplements and also 5 total doses of HIV meds.

Hope that clarifies my thoughts on my regimen better.
 
The reason smaller/multiple doses (if available) and single meds that also have a combo available are generally not freely offered by doctors openly is because they are afraid of people missing doses and becoming resistant. The more complexity to an HIV dosage regimen, the more opportunity there is too fail. That is why Atripla, Truvada, Epzicom and the new quad are being pushed so hard by doctors, it simplifies things and creates an increased chance for most to have treatment success.

Ann, that is an interesting point you make on some thinking HIV recommended doses are too high for some people. I too have wondered about that also. Can you imagine if we all were to go shoe shopping and they only had one size shoe of each style for all to buy, lol.
--Gary
« Last Edit: January 15, 2011, 05:47:39 PM by legolas613 »
2009 Oct -- infected.
2009 Nov -- seroconverted.
2010 Feb -- tested HIV+. 
2010 Feb -- CD4=457,33% VL/WBC=3.8k/4.4
2010 Dec -- CD4=568,40% VL/WBC=3.6k/3.7
2011 Jan -- HLA B5071 test +; couldn't use Ziagen.
2011 Jan -- began Viread, Epivir and Intellence.
2011 May -- CD4=409,43% VL/WBC=UD/3.8
2011 Aug -- CD4=404,44% VL/WBC=8.8k/4.0
2011 Sept -- switched to Truvada & boosted Prezista. CD4 suppression, SE and adherance issues.
2011 Nov -- CD4=522,49% VL/WBC=2.3k/3.5
2012 Jan -- discontinued meds. SE and adherance issues, deciding on new regimen.
2012 Feb -- resistance testing revealed mutations: 3 NRTI (incl K65R), 4 NNRTI and 3 PI's.
2012 Apr -- CD4=599,41% VL/WBC=263/3.8
2012 May -- Shingles
2012 Oct -- CD4=493,36% VL/WBC=4.7k/4.4 (still my latest Dr. visit as of 2/01/2014)

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #72 on: January 15, 2011, 08:58:31 PM »
aspirin isn't the same as ARV
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline legolas613

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #73 on: January 15, 2011, 10:02:55 PM »
Of coarse not. I was merely using it as an example. HIV meds and other meds/drugs can be broken up so long as the target dose per day is met and in the case of HIV meds as they broken up in a balanced way; same dose amount evenly spread throughout the day (every 6/8/12 hours).
« Last Edit: January 15, 2011, 10:07:57 PM by legolas613 »
2009 Oct -- infected.
2009 Nov -- seroconverted.
2010 Feb -- tested HIV+. 
2010 Feb -- CD4=457,33% VL/WBC=3.8k/4.4
2010 Dec -- CD4=568,40% VL/WBC=3.6k/3.7
2011 Jan -- HLA B5071 test +; couldn't use Ziagen.
2011 Jan -- began Viread, Epivir and Intellence.
2011 May -- CD4=409,43% VL/WBC=UD/3.8
2011 Aug -- CD4=404,44% VL/WBC=8.8k/4.0
2011 Sept -- switched to Truvada & boosted Prezista. CD4 suppression, SE and adherance issues.
2011 Nov -- CD4=522,49% VL/WBC=2.3k/3.5
2012 Jan -- discontinued meds. SE and adherance issues, deciding on new regimen.
2012 Feb -- resistance testing revealed mutations: 3 NRTI (incl K65R), 4 NNRTI and 3 PI's.
2012 Apr -- CD4=599,41% VL/WBC=263/3.8
2012 May -- Shingles
2012 Oct -- CD4=493,36% VL/WBC=4.7k/4.4 (still my latest Dr. visit as of 2/01/2014)

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #74 on: January 15, 2011, 10:17:52 PM »
You got a link for that claim?
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline legolas613

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #75 on: January 15, 2011, 11:51:29 PM »
I don't have a link at hand but I know I have read multiple times from trials that 2 dosing times to achieve the daily dose of an HIV drug vs. the same drug given at it's once day strength (if available or approved once a day) is slightly more effective. It's not a big difference but is probably a little more effective than the trials suggest because adherance to multiple dosing times is not easily achieved by everyone, as I'm sure some people in those trials had some kind of adherance problem. I think reyataz was one but there are others I've read about. Also isentress recently abandoned it's effort to create it into a once a day formulation because trials were proving that the 1 dose a day was not being as effective (and it must not have been too close if they abandoned it) as the twice a day regimen.
--Gary   
2009 Oct -- infected.
2009 Nov -- seroconverted.
2010 Feb -- tested HIV+. 
2010 Feb -- CD4=457,33% VL/WBC=3.8k/4.4
2010 Dec -- CD4=568,40% VL/WBC=3.6k/3.7
2011 Jan -- HLA B5071 test +; couldn't use Ziagen.
2011 Jan -- began Viread, Epivir and Intellence.
2011 May -- CD4=409,43% VL/WBC=UD/3.8
2011 Aug -- CD4=404,44% VL/WBC=8.8k/4.0
2011 Sept -- switched to Truvada & boosted Prezista. CD4 suppression, SE and adherance issues.
2011 Nov -- CD4=522,49% VL/WBC=2.3k/3.5
2012 Jan -- discontinued meds. SE and adherance issues, deciding on new regimen.
2012 Feb -- resistance testing revealed mutations: 3 NRTI (incl K65R), 4 NNRTI and 3 PI's.
2012 Apr -- CD4=599,41% VL/WBC=263/3.8
2012 May -- Shingles
2012 Oct -- CD4=493,36% VL/WBC=4.7k/4.4 (still my latest Dr. visit as of 2/01/2014)

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,946
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #76 on: January 16, 2011, 12:44:30 AM »
Are you taking into account the half life of the medications you are taking and ny reducing the dosage and spreading them out you are reducing the amount of medication circulating? Just a thought.  Good luck

Offline legolas613

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #77 on: January 16, 2011, 04:37:33 AM »
Are you taking into account the half life of the medications you are taking and ny reducing the dosage and spreading them out you are reducing the amount of medication circulating?
It is dangerous to unilaterally change approved dosages of any HIV med. One should always make decisions about ones daily HIV regimen with their doctor. Epivir is a good example, I chose to get the 150mg tablets twice a day as opposed to the once a day Epivir of 300mg. There are also many meds split into 2 daily doses that don't have a once a day option. Everyone should do what they feel is best for themselves and keep doses within approved amounts (not cutting pills) already available and for most people that also means building as simple of a regimen as possible. It's ok to think outside the box concerning your HIV meds but only so long as you stay within the box (approved guidelines or your dr's ok).
take care
--Gary
« Last Edit: January 16, 2011, 07:38:38 AM by legolas613 »
2009 Oct -- infected.
2009 Nov -- seroconverted.
2010 Feb -- tested HIV+. 
2010 Feb -- CD4=457,33% VL/WBC=3.8k/4.4
2010 Dec -- CD4=568,40% VL/WBC=3.6k/3.7
2011 Jan -- HLA B5071 test +; couldn't use Ziagen.
2011 Jan -- began Viread, Epivir and Intellence.
2011 May -- CD4=409,43% VL/WBC=UD/3.8
2011 Aug -- CD4=404,44% VL/WBC=8.8k/4.0
2011 Sept -- switched to Truvada & boosted Prezista. CD4 suppression, SE and adherance issues.
2011 Nov -- CD4=522,49% VL/WBC=2.3k/3.5
2012 Jan -- discontinued meds. SE and adherance issues, deciding on new regimen.
2012 Feb -- resistance testing revealed mutations: 3 NRTI (incl K65R), 4 NNRTI and 3 PI's.
2012 Apr -- CD4=599,41% VL/WBC=263/3.8
2012 May -- Shingles
2012 Oct -- CD4=493,36% VL/WBC=4.7k/4.4 (still my latest Dr. visit as of 2/01/2014)

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,110
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #78 on: January 16, 2011, 10:26:01 AM »
I don't have a link at hand but I know I have read multiple times from trials that 2 dosing times to achieve the daily dose of an HIV drug vs. the same drug given at it's once day strength (if available or approved once a day) is slightly more effective. It's not a big difference but is probably a little more effective than the trials suggest because adherance to multiple dosing times is not easily achieved by everyone, as I'm sure some people in those trials had some kind of adherance problem. I think reyataz was one but there are others I've read about. Also isentress recently abandoned it's effort to create it into a once a day formulation because trials were proving that the 1 dose a day was not being as effective (and it must not have been too close if they abandoned it) as the twice a day regimen.
--Gary  

So, since all things aren't equal with each ARV you basically don't really know what you're talking about.
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #79 on: January 16, 2011, 10:42:57 AM »
Gary, do you realise that when you post in all italics and bold, your posts are kinda difficult to read? Especially your larger paragraphs.
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline legolas613

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #80 on: January 16, 2011, 03:03:33 PM »
Gary, do you realise that when you post in all italics and bold, your posts are kinda difficult to read? Especially your larger paragraphs.
Sorry about that Ann, it is my default preference but I'll try to limit it going forward.
Take care
--Gary
2009 Oct -- infected.
2009 Nov -- seroconverted.
2010 Feb -- tested HIV+. 
2010 Feb -- CD4=457,33% VL/WBC=3.8k/4.4
2010 Dec -- CD4=568,40% VL/WBC=3.6k/3.7
2011 Jan -- HLA B5071 test +; couldn't use Ziagen.
2011 Jan -- began Viread, Epivir and Intellence.
2011 May -- CD4=409,43% VL/WBC=UD/3.8
2011 Aug -- CD4=404,44% VL/WBC=8.8k/4.0
2011 Sept -- switched to Truvada & boosted Prezista. CD4 suppression, SE and adherance issues.
2011 Nov -- CD4=522,49% VL/WBC=2.3k/3.5
2012 Jan -- discontinued meds. SE and adherance issues, deciding on new regimen.
2012 Feb -- resistance testing revealed mutations: 3 NRTI (incl K65R), 4 NNRTI and 3 PI's.
2012 Apr -- CD4=599,41% VL/WBC=263/3.8
2012 May -- Shingles
2012 Oct -- CD4=493,36% VL/WBC=4.7k/4.4 (still my latest Dr. visit as of 2/01/2014)

Offline legolas613

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #81 on: January 16, 2011, 03:13:53 PM »
So, since all things aren't equal with each ARV you basically don't really know what you're talking about.
I never said anything was equal in regards to the ARV treatments. Actually I've done my best to explain my thoughts and opinions, if you still don't understand me or maybe you just don't want to understand me and are just trying to find fault in what I say. I know HIV is a "crap shoot", I'm within guidlines and only advocate staying within them. My regimen choice and dosing schedule and vitamin supplemention may be out of the mainstream, but I'm very happy and confident with the direction of my treatment.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2011, 03:16:50 PM by legolas613 »
2009 Oct -- infected.
2009 Nov -- seroconverted.
2010 Feb -- tested HIV+. 
2010 Feb -- CD4=457,33% VL/WBC=3.8k/4.4
2010 Dec -- CD4=568,40% VL/WBC=3.6k/3.7
2011 Jan -- HLA B5071 test +; couldn't use Ziagen.
2011 Jan -- began Viread, Epivir and Intellence.
2011 May -- CD4=409,43% VL/WBC=UD/3.8
2011 Aug -- CD4=404,44% VL/WBC=8.8k/4.0
2011 Sept -- switched to Truvada & boosted Prezista. CD4 suppression, SE and adherance issues.
2011 Nov -- CD4=522,49% VL/WBC=2.3k/3.5
2012 Jan -- discontinued meds. SE and adherance issues, deciding on new regimen.
2012 Feb -- resistance testing revealed mutations: 3 NRTI (incl K65R), 4 NNRTI and 3 PI's.
2012 Apr -- CD4=599,41% VL/WBC=263/3.8
2012 May -- Shingles
2012 Oct -- CD4=493,36% VL/WBC=4.7k/4.4 (still my latest Dr. visit as of 2/01/2014)

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #82 on: January 16, 2011, 05:56:10 PM »
My regimen choice and dosing schedule and vitamin supplemention may be out of the mainstream, but I'm very happy and confident with the direction of my treatment.

I kind of did the same for a while out of 2 concerns:

- both meds I take are eliminated through the liver and 'potentially' harmfull to ... the liver, so I spaced them at the beginning (I don't do that any more)

- the other is a competitive 'entry' between Abacavir (which I take) and insulin into the cell. There is one study about this, it confirms it, but it concluded also that it is not clinically significant. OK... not clinically significant because not everyone has insulin resistant, but I do...

Now that I am more than 6 months into the meds, it is less of a concern to me.

Eric
NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #83 on: July 11, 2011, 05:09:56 PM »
Just thought I'd update this thread with the latest developments.

I actually didn't feel much better after being on a half dose of Truvada - that fatigue never really lifted in the way I was hoping it would. I mentioned my constant tiredness to my doctor at the time and he rolled his eyes and said 'The LAST thing we want to do is change your medication.'

Hmmmm....by this point I was pretty desperate, so a couple of weeks later I decided to drop Truvada altogether. Within about a few days, it was as if a fog had lifted and I began to feel better than I had done in ages.

I happened to be seeing a different doctor for another issue and after a few consultations we'd built up a very good rapport, so I decided to tell him. He was very laid-back about the whole thing and his first comment was 'Well, you're on the right drugs as we know this doesn't work with all PIs.' He then went on to mention a 5 year study called PIVOT, which is looking at people taking just Darunaviir and Norvir, which started in 2008 and closes at the end of 2013. He told me that the study's hope is that it will provide another treatment option for patients without the toxicities of taking Truvada long term. It would also be a cheaper regime to fund for the NHS.

My viral load has remained suppressed and he thinks there's a strong likelihood that it will remain so (which is why the PIVOT study was green lighted), and this is happy for me to continue on this regime and wrote me a prescription for a few more months.

Just to finish off by saying that I'm NOT encouraging people to monkey around with their treatment of their own accord and to speak to your doctor if you wish to modify/change your medications.
« Last Edit: July 12, 2011, 11:58:38 AM by Zohar »
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

Offline newt

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,885
  • the one and original newt
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #84 on: July 11, 2011, 06:03:26 PM »
Good.

The test of treatment is a suppressed viral load so long may this continue on your mini-but-probably-strong-enough combo.

- matt
"The object is to be a well patient, not a good patient"

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #85 on: July 11, 2011, 07:07:51 PM »
I'm now considering taking lower doses of Darunavir and Norvir, but am undecided at this point.

This was in your original OP...

I think it was worth discussing this in this thread as well as with this new doctor that you have.

as described here:
http://www.iasusa.org/pub/topics/2010/issue3/104.pdf

(figure 6)

The Darunavir and Norvir is pivotal to you combo. it has a much higher potency index than truvada.

which is why it may make sense to try treatment simplification KEEPING the most potent drug and dropping the lesser potent. but, IMHO, not the otherway around.

What you are currently doing is pretty much like entering a clinical trial (you are in one intervention arm and have proper medical follow up), the only difference is that your personal experiment will not be aggregated with that of the real people who enter the real trial.

As long as you have proper medical supervision, I do no see any objection in you taking that risk.
After all, those who volunteered to enter the trial are taking that same risk (actually randomly risk is halved)

It is the lowering of Darunavir and Norvir, that you were originally considering, that could have been dangerous.

I think it was a good idea that you opened that discussion here and with this new doctor before attempting your original Darunavir/n lowering plans.

Hoping everything will go fine for you

Eric
NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline eric48

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,177
  • @HIVPharmaCure & tinyurl.com/HIVPharmaCure
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #86 on: July 11, 2011, 08:38:36 PM »
a couple of weeks later I decided to drop Truvada altogether. Within about a few days, it was as if a fog had lifted and I began to feel better than I had done in ages.

Zohar,

this is all very interesting and I hope you will keep us posted.

While the PIVOT trial is still on going, the MONOI trial results are being analysed and published.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20802297

they are very encouraging, but, once again this is experimental and some other aspects need to be reviewed as discussed here :

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21150592

it is said there that:
The risk of resistance development is minimal and patients who fail this strategy can be re-suppressed again by adding nucleosides or switching to a triple therapy regimen without having lost therapeutic options.

I am sure you will feel reassured by that...

predicting which monotherapy maintenance strategy may have a chance to be successfull is no easy business (not every trial is successfull... see for exemple:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16267763


but some reseracher are digging hard into potency index not only as a whole, but potency index as per mutation in order to predict which monotherapy might have a chance to be successfull:

see Shen and Siliciano's

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3088572/?tool=pubmed

DoseĖresponse curve slope is a missing dimension in the analysis of HIV-1 drug resistance

This is a complicated matter...

As your new doctor commented, it may be by chance that you where originally on the right drug (Darunavir/n) for this little experiment of yours...

I would certainly not have tried this on the combo I am on (NNRTI + 2 NRTI)

It may be by chance ... or, it may be because of what Shen and Siliciano's are currently demonstrating and is likely to change the paradigm of TRI-therapy (in the context of maintenance, that is after being UD for a while...)

Just some thoughts...

Definitively , please keep us posted

Eric

NVP/ABC/3TC/... UD; CD4 > 1000; CD4/CD8 ~ 2.0   safety stock : 2 months

Offline Zohar

  • Member
  • Posts: 248
Re: Reducing the dose of HIV drugs
« Reply #87 on: July 12, 2011, 09:31:41 AM »
I never did reduce the dose of Darunavir and Norvir. I just decided to cut out Truvada altogether and leave the doses of the other drugs at their prescribed level. I started another thread a few months ago about having constantly red eyes, and this stopped within a matter of days of dropping the Truvada. I often felt as if I was sort of hungover on the original combination and the red eyes made me look it too. I don't know whether my liver was struggling to process the Truvada, but, as I've said, I feel - and look- so much better now.

I'm due to see my doctor again in a couple of months.
''Poor is the man whose pleasures depend on the permission of another.''

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.