Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 17, 2014, 08:36:08 AM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 639056
  • Total Topics: 48514
  • Online Today: 205
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.  (Read 10966 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,657
  • red pill? or blue pill?
Hi all.

Since there are a lot of newbies around, and this subject is popping up in various threads, I thought I would create a dedicated thread, once again.

By now you may have heard that the german pop star has been declared guilty of both non-disclosure and principally, transmission of HIV (many years ago, to an ex boyfriend).
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/26/nadja-benaissa-found-guil_n_695360.html

She got off pretty easy, in a global perspective, with the German justice system giving her a 2-year suspended sentence.

HIV+ people around the world MUST be aware of the legal risks they have in the states and nations in which they are having sex.  Whether or not you agree with the prosecutions, they happen.

A lawyer just posted an interesting discussion of the very latest reasoning that should be applied to such cases considering the latest science and medicine:
http://www.towleroad.com/2010/08/stop-or-my-hiv-will-shoot.html

Unfortunately, no HIV+ person can take for granted that the law or that their partners will be reasonable.
Especially the law.

If you are a newbie - please learn now that there one important issue to understand:  non-disclosure can be a crime, even if there is no transmission.  Depending on where you live.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_transmission_of_HIV

If anyone can't google and find the laws that apply in their location, just chirp up and maybe other members here can help find them.

http://criminalhivtransmission.blogspot.com/
Criminal HIV Transmission
A collection of published news stories, opinion, and resources about so-called 'HIV crimes'.

« Last Edit: August 27, 2010, 05:14:21 PM by mecch »
“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

Offline Rev. Moon

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,782
  • Smart ass faggot ©
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2010, 03:38:54 PM »
No disrespect intended, but was this really necessary?  This has to be disclosure thread #236,748 (cross referenced with "criminalization of HIV" thread #158,462). These things always go downhill and they are not appreciated by many of us around here.

But that's just my opinion. Newbies, have at it for all that I care.
"I have tried hard--but life is difficult, and I am a very useless person. I can hardly be said to have an independent existence. I was just a screw or a cog in the great machine I called life, and when I dropped out of it I found I was of no use anywhere else."

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,705
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2010, 03:51:57 PM »
No disrespect intended, but was this really necessary?  This has to be disclosure thread #236,748 (cross referenced with "criminalization of HIV" thread #158,462). These things always go downhill and they are not appreciated by many of us around here.

But that's just my opinion. Newbies, have at it for all that I care.

Agreed...  a lot of hurt feelings generally erupt from the issue of criminalization of HIV as well. While knowledge is always necessary, I don't think any of us are in the spectrum that involves non-disclosure.  We care to much for ourselves..  it is what it is though.  The newbies can have at it... but in the end it takes time (for some) living with HIV to truly understand the impact criminalization has for all of us.

I offer the thread good luck anyways.
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline phildinftlaudy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,965
  • sweet Ann what you think babe...
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2010, 03:56:21 PM »
Agreed...  a lot of hurt feelings generally erupt from the issue of criminalization of HIV as well. While knowledge is always necessary, I don't think any of us are in the spectrum that involves non-disclosure.  We care to much for ourselves..  it is what it is though.  The newbies can have at it... but in the end it takes time (for some) living with HIV to truly understand the impact criminalization has for all of us.

I offer the thread good luck anyways.
I agree - everytime I have seen a thread with this topic area it always ignites into personal name calling and eventually gets locked.... maybe this time will be different.... ???
September 13, 2008 - diagnosed +
Labs:
Date    CD4    %   VL     Date  CD4  %   VL
10/08  636    35  510   9/09 473  38 2900  12/4/09 Atripla
12/09  540    30    60   
12/10  740    41  <48   
8/11    667    36  <20  
03/12  1,041  42  <20
05/12  1,241  47  <20
08/12   780    37  <20
11/12   549    35  <20
02/12  1,102  42  <20
11/12   549    35  <20

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Ninja Please
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2010, 04:32:39 PM »
How in the fuck is this an Off Topic thread?

MtD

Offline mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,657
  • red pill? or blue pill?
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2010, 04:41:51 PM »
Ah, three such very unhopeful responses.

If it's not for you, don't come back here.

I posted it to give information for people more naive about the issue then yourselves. I didn't insult anyone. The German story is very much in the news.

P.S. if its in the wrong section, the moderators can move it. Keep your vulgar mouth to yourself, MTD. 

“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Ninja Please
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #6 on: August 26, 2010, 04:46:22 PM »
Ah, three such very unhopeful responses.

If it's not for you, don't come back here.

I posted it to give information for people more naive about the issue then yourselves. I didn't insult anyone. The German story is very much in the news.

P.S. if its in the wrong section, the moderators can move it. Keep your vulgar mouth to yourself, MTD. 

It's not fucking rocket surgery. Off Topic is an HIV free zone. That's what it was created for back in fucking 2005.

A place where we could talk about something other than HIV. ::)

If you want to indulge yourself with another round of HIV disclosure hair pulling then post it in fucking LW where this sort of mindless shit belongs.

And yes, I've reported it.

MtD

/edit to correct a fucking typo/
« Last Edit: August 26, 2010, 04:48:11 PM by Matty the Damned »

Offline David Evans

  • member
  • Member
  • Posts: 97
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2010, 05:02:35 PM »
It actually does belong in living with HIV. And I'm moving it now. I'll be watching it closely and if it devolves, as many on this subject do, it will get locked.

David

Offline Queen Tokelove

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,033
  • Smokey the Smurf
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2010, 05:04:36 PM »
It doesn't matter to me one way or the other but as most knows about me, I don't disclose. It's on a need to know basis with me. And I have my reasons for being that way. I don't knock those who want to scream their status for the world to see or those who wish to do it to fight the STIGMA. I respect their choice to do that. All I ask is respect my choice NOT TO until I feel it is necessary to.
Started Atripla/Ziagen on 9/13/07.
10/31/07 CD4-265 VL- undetectable
2/6/08 CD4- 401 VL- undetectable
5/7/08 CD4- 705 VL- undetectable
6/4/08 CD4- 775 VL- undetectable
8/6/08 CD4- 805 VL- undetectable
11/13/08 CD4- 774 VL--undetectable
2/4/09  CD4- 484  VL- 18,000 (2 months off meds)
3/3/09---Starting Back on Meds---
4/27/09 CD4- 664 VL-- undetectable
6/17/09 CD4- 438 VL- 439
8/09 CD4- 404 VL- 1,600
01-22-10-- CD4- 525 VL- 59,000
Cherish the simple things life has to offer

The Royal Blog

Offline BT65

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 9,940
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #9 on: August 26, 2010, 06:18:08 PM »
These damned "non-disclosure=criminal" threads are terribly nauseating.  Can't you find something else to prattle on about?  I'm sure n00bs can search out the old threads if need be.
I've never killed anyone, but I frequently get satisfaction reading the obituary notices.-Clarence Darrow

Offline jkinatl2

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,007
  • Doo. Dah. Dipp-ity.
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #10 on: August 26, 2010, 06:22:55 PM »
Why do you do this, Mecch? Why continually force these divisive issues to the front of the line? Is this a community or a debate class?
"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

-Kimberly Page-Shafer, PhD, MPH

Welcome Thread

Offline newt

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,885
  • the one and original newt
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #11 on: August 26, 2010, 06:28:16 PM »
Non-disclosure is not a crime per se, so change the title please. It's not even metaphorically a crime, even for HIV. There are also many situations where non-disclosure is a very good and extremely sound idea.

A sensible discussion about crimnal laws and HIV discussion is very hard, especially when people may feel guilty, or just bad, about having acquired HIV, or perhaps having potentially passed it on. If passing on a potentially life-thretening virus is criminal you better get the cops out next flu season, bus journey or shag.

We's not criminals for having a virus.

There, I restrained myself and didn't swear in that last sentence.

- matt
"The object is to be a well patient, not a good patient"

Offline Boze

  • Member
  • Posts: 477
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #12 on: August 26, 2010, 06:37:59 PM »
Why do you do this, Mecch? Why continually force these divisive issues to the front of the line? Is this a community or a debate class?


C'mon, this is not rocket science. There is a new member on the forum who appears to be...umm...not very knowledgeable about HIV.  He asked a question of whether he should disclose his status to his tricks - indicating that he is not aware of the consequences he can face for failing to disclose.
Mech thought it would be useful to start a thread reminding all the new members about the criminal persecution they can face if they fail to disclose to sex partners. It is not meant to be an area to discuss the legal/ethical merits of current legislation - only a brief primer to those who may not be aware of what the law is.
==========
Aug08 - Seroconversion
Mar10 - Diagnosis; cd4 690 - VL 19,000
Apr10 - cd4 600
May10 - VL 4,500
Jun10 - started Atripla ; VL 113
Jul 10 - UD vl, CD4 590
Aug 10 - UD, CD4 810, 52%
Nov 10 - UD, CD4 980

Offline Rev. Moon

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,782
  • Smart ass faggot ©
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #13 on: August 26, 2010, 06:38:56 PM »


We's not criminals for having a virus.

There, I restrained myself and didn't swear in that last sentence.

- matt


I'll say it for you Matt cause this type of thread gets my blood boiling:

We're not fucking criminals just because we have a goddamned virus. So stop this bullshit.
"I have tried hard--but life is difficult, and I am a very useless person. I can hardly be said to have an independent existence. I was just a screw or a cog in the great machine I called life, and when I dropped out of it I found I was of no use anywhere else."

Online Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,076
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #14 on: August 26, 2010, 06:48:55 PM »
Au contraire!  I'm a criminal of love.
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Ninja Please
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #15 on: August 26, 2010, 06:58:02 PM »
C'mon, this is not rocket science. There is a new member on the forum who appears to be...umm...not very knowledgeable about HIV.  He asked a question of whether he should disclose his status to his tricks - indicating that he is not aware of the consequences he can face for failing to disclose.
Mech thought it would be useful to start a thread reminding all the new members about the criminal persecution they can face if they fail to disclose to sex partners. It is not meant to be an area to discuss the legal/ethical merits of current legislation - only a brief primer to those who may not be aware of what the law is.

A primer my gigantic hairy white arse. It's just another fucking opportunity for the shame-weenies to beat their puny chests about what they see as unfairness of having HIV.

MtD

Offline newt

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,885
  • the one and original newt
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2010, 06:59:40 PM »
shame-weenie...that is so going on a t-shirt (perhaps with picture)
"The object is to be a well patient, not a good patient"

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Ninja Please
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2010, 07:12:17 PM »
shame-weenie...that is so going on a t-shirt (perhaps with picture)

Memes-While-U-Wait. :)

MtD

Offline sharkdiver

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,350
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2010, 07:17:37 PM »
why, why why why why on earth did you have to start a thread like this?


Offline jkinatl2

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,007
  • Doo. Dah. Dipp-ity.
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2010, 08:05:09 PM »
I fully disagree, Boze. It is an incendiary thread started with no purpose other than a flamewar - only  a WEEK after an identical thread was locked.

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

-Kimberly Page-Shafer, PhD, MPH

Welcome Thread

Offline phildinftlaudy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,965
  • sweet Ann what you think babe...
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #20 on: August 26, 2010, 08:14:51 PM »
I fully disagree, Boze. It is an incendiary thread started with no purpose other than a flamewar - only  a WEEK after an identical thread was locked.


I agree completely that this thread topic - as past recent history has shown - has the potential to be incendiary.  I also think it is quite interesting that the "primer" purpose for newbies doesn't seem to be occurring at all.  I also agree that newbies can search the past topic areas and find whatever information related to this topic area that they may need to know.  Also, information was provided on another thread of where people could look to find out information.
September 13, 2008 - diagnosed +
Labs:
Date    CD4    %   VL     Date  CD4  %   VL
10/08  636    35  510   9/09 473  38 2900  12/4/09 Atripla
12/09  540    30    60   
12/10  740    41  <48   
8/11    667    36  <20  
03/12  1,041  42  <20
05/12  1,241  47  <20
08/12   780    37  <20
11/12   549    35  <20
02/12  1,102  42  <20
11/12   549    35  <20

Offline Joe K

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 3,660
  • 31 Years Poz
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #21 on: August 26, 2010, 08:18:35 PM »
As a member of this community, I believe we all have the responsibility to be sensitive to other members. The topic of criminalization of HIV exposure, is a very tender subject here and Mecch, I believe you have an obligation to honor the wishes of the forum. Especially, when you are starting a thread, with a topic that was locked a week ago, due to the divisive nature of the subject. Being part of this community requires respect for others and sometimes you really need to think before you post such a tender topic.

Offline Andy Velez

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 24,689
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #22 on: August 26, 2010, 08:24:01 PM »
Just want to caution that we're watching this thread lest it erupt into another flame war. I agree with others who have said the kind of information which newbies need is definitely pretty widely available about legal issues related to disclosure.

For the timebeing I'm leaving this one open. We'll see if anything useful comes of it.  I  also note that not a single newbie has commented that this is a helpful "discussion."
Andy Velez

Offline elf

  • Member
  • Posts: 607
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2010, 08:31:30 PM »
Here where I live:
hiv disclosure is not considered a must if a condom is used,
hiv transmition cases have made it into the newspapers but no one has been sentenced because of the transmission.

But still...
I'm not ready to tell anyone about my status (less is more) because I haven't really benefited from
disclosing so far (all my friends ran away, and some may have spread the ''news'')...


Bottom line: any nondisclosure can make a headline,
so, watch out! Newspapers of today only serve to humiliate you.
Condom or no condom, criminal transmission law or not, It does not matter to them.

Anyone can sue you for everything.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2010, 08:40:55 PM by elf »
Let's have a Kiki!

Offline ElZorro

  • Member
  • Posts: 535
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2010, 09:01:46 PM »
Interesting thread....not much meat in it after the OP, though, right?  In fact, if you removed all of the responses that simply questioned why the thread was created, it would be pretty short .... lol

Offline mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,657
  • red pill? or blue pill?
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #25 on: August 26, 2010, 10:21:22 PM »
Exactly.  Im not flaming anyone.

I didn't see the locked thread.  So I certainly didn't create a flame war there, and am not inviting one here.

Newbies may not comment right away.  If ever.  It was just posted a few hours ago, geez.

I saw several news stories this week about non disclosure and prosecution.  Its on the front page in Switzerland.  Its a big world. 

I think this is shoot the messenger. I dont understand the animosity to me, a member of this community.  I didn't write the laws, I don't prosecute them, and I think they are dumb.  I think we need to know about them and then each person makes up his own mind about his actions.   

I don't understand why bringing attention to state persecution of HIV+ people is considered an offensive act by an HIV+ person, myself, against HIV+ people. 

Furthermore, I'm not shaming anyone.  It's not a thread about your personal actions. 

When I joined this forum, I didn't know much about a lot of things and I learned it by reading peoples conversations.  I don't understand why internecene bitchiness among us members, has any value in a thread on a serious topic such as knowing the legal stakes in being HIV+ in certain parts of the world. 

Quite a few of you don't personally like me so send me personal hate mail privately but unless you have something constructive and informative to add toward informing people.

Newt is right that a discussion of this topic is difficult but if we can't do it here, what a pity.  He is wrong saying non disclosure is not criminal, per se, which is the point of my post, because evidently in some countries and in some states in the US, it a prosecutable offense.

There is a man who may serve 15 years for a one off encounter, in Texas.  I personally find this very worrisome and if you do to, why shoot me, the messenger?

Can we stay on the topic and discuss that?  Or do you who dislike me so much have to hijack the thread?

“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Ninja Please
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #26 on: August 26, 2010, 10:24:27 PM »
Exactly.  Im not flaming anyone.

I didn't see the locked thread.  So I certainly didn't create a flame war there, and am not inviting one here.

Newbies may not comment right away.  If ever.  It was just posted a few hours ago, geez.

I saw several news stories this week about non disclosure and prosecution.  Its on the front page in Switzerland.  Its a big world. 

I think this is shoot the messenger. I dont understand the animosity to me, a member of this community.  I didn't write the laws, I don't prosecute them, and I think they are dumb.  I think we need to know about them and then each person makes up his own mind about his actions.   

I don't understand why bringing attention to state persecution of HIV+ people is considered an offensive act by an HIV+ person, myself, against HIV+ people. 

Furthermore, I'm not shaming anyone.  It's not a thread about your personal actions. 

When I joined this forum, I didn't know much about a lot of things and I learned it by reading peoples conversations.  I don't understand why internecene bitchiness among us members, has any value in a thread on a serious topic such as knowing the legal stakes in being HIV+ in certain parts of the world. 

Quite a few of you don't personally like me so send me personal hate mail privately but unless you have something constructive and informative to add toward informing people.

Newt is right that a discussion of this topic is difficult but if we can't do it here, what a pity.  He is wrong saying non disclosure is not criminal, per se, which is the point of my post, because evidently in some countries and in some states in the US, it a prosecutable offense.

There is a man who may serve 15 years for a one off encounter, in Texas.  I personally find this very worrisome and if you do to, why shoot me, the messenger?

Can we stay on the topic and discuss that?  Or do you who dislike me so much have to hijack the thread?

You didn't see this 9 page monster?

Heidi, please. Clean the shit out of your eyes. ::)

There is nothing in your OP which wasn't covered in the previous clusterfuck. Or the eleventy-squillion other threads that have been had on this sucked dry issue.

MtD

Offline Hellraiser

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,136
  • Semi-misanthropic
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #27 on: August 26, 2010, 10:27:55 PM »
I actually never read the archived discussions.  So I don't necessarily see new members of the forums reading up on the old threads to find this material.  After viewing the thread that was turning into this very discussion mecch started a new thread in an attempt not to further derail.

Online Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,076
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #28 on: August 26, 2010, 10:29:58 PM »
"archived"?  that was two weeks ago
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Offline Hellraiser

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,136
  • Semi-misanthropic
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #29 on: August 26, 2010, 10:30:55 PM »
"archived"?  that was two weeks ago

So if someone started reading the forums this week then they would not see an older thread.  I honestly don't even know which thread you guys are talking about and I catch up on these threads daily.

Offline Rev. Moon

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,782
  • Smart ass faggot ©
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #30 on: August 26, 2010, 10:34:53 PM »
So if someone started reading the forums this week then they would not see an older thread.  I honestly don't even know which thread you guys are talking about and I catch up on these threads daily.

C'mon Fergie, remember the "but he looked so healthy" thread about some fella in Australia?  Don't tell me that your memory is failing you this early.
"I have tried hard--but life is difficult, and I am a very useless person. I can hardly be said to have an independent existence. I was just a screw or a cog in the great machine I called life, and when I dropped out of it I found I was of no use anywhere else."

Offline WillyWump

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,175
  • your ramblings bore Yamaguchi Kitteh
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #31 on: August 26, 2010, 10:35:24 PM »
Frankly I dont see what all the broo-ha-ha is about. I actually find Mecchs info and links useful. I too, missed "the other" thread.

-W
POZ since '08

Last Labs-
6/3/14 CD4- 736, UD 34%
6/25/13 CD4- 1036, UD,
2/4/13, CD4 - 489, UD, 28%

Current Meds: Prezista/Epzicom/ Norvir
.

Offline Hellraiser

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,136
  • Semi-misanthropic
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #32 on: August 26, 2010, 10:35:44 PM »
C'mon Fergie, remember the "but he looked so healthy" thread about some fella in Australia?  Don't tell me that your memory is failing you this early.

That only got locked 2 weeks ago?  I was thinking it was more like 2 months.  I do seem to remember it getting resurrected a long time after it was initially posted though.

Online Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,076
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #33 on: August 26, 2010, 10:37:18 PM »
So if someone started reading the forums this week then they would not see an older thread.  I honestly don't even know which thread you guys are talking about and I catch up on these threads daily.

So we should do a new thread like this every two weeks, year after year?  Oh, what a brilliant idea Hellboy.
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Offline Hellraiser

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,136
  • Semi-misanthropic
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #34 on: August 26, 2010, 10:40:29 PM »
So we should do a new thread like this every two weeks, year after year?  Oh, what a brilliant idea Hellboy.

You know as well as I do these forums continually generate discussion over the same topics.  It's going to happen as there's really the same issues facing all of us continually.  I'm a little concerned over what I perceive as people essentially boycotting Mecch's post because it was Mecch who posted it.  In truth he was attempting to be helpful and if you or anyone didn't like it there was really no reason to post in it.

Offline phildinftlaudy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,965
  • sweet Ann what you think babe...
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #35 on: August 26, 2010, 10:41:00 PM »
So if someone started reading the forums this week then they would not see an older thread.  I honestly don't even know which thread you guys are talking about and I catch up on these threads daily.
It was there Trey - I very well remember it - In fact, I believe that the resulting comments that the thread incited actually led to a member getting either timed out or banned --- at any rate, I think that much like we provide links to reputable sources for medical information, this thread (at the beginning, if I recall while typing) and the other thread that was locked, as well as a thread that is currently still open have given ample resources to find out legal issues surrounding non-disclosure in a person's respective state/country.  Once that info is out there (which it is) anything else that is going to go on in a thread with this type of topic is going to be opinion-based and for sake of debate, argument or dispute.  Just my "opinion" on the matter.  
September 13, 2008 - diagnosed +
Labs:
Date    CD4    %   VL     Date  CD4  %   VL
10/08  636    35  510   9/09 473  38 2900  12/4/09 Atripla
12/09  540    30    60   
12/10  740    41  <48   
8/11    667    36  <20  
03/12  1,041  42  <20
05/12  1,241  47  <20
08/12   780    37  <20
11/12   549    35  <20
02/12  1,102  42  <20
11/12   549    35  <20

Offline texas_stud

  • Member
  • Posts: 21
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #36 on: August 26, 2010, 10:55:47 PM »



this post is very scary. i dont like it. and i understand why these dudes get pissed off about it.



boze: i know you directed this at me. i dont like you dude.
i dont know how to use the purple boxes but heres what you said

(boze)
C'mon, this is not rocket science. There is a new member on the forum who appears to be...umm...not very knowledgeable about HIV.  He asked a question of whether he should disclose his status to his tricks - indicating that he is not aware of the consequences he can face for failing to disclose.


i guess your calling me dumb. mrs ann told me that you were not supposed to do that.
keep your mean to yourself.


i have to go to work at the club. dont fight anymore dudes.

Offline Queen Tokelove

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,033
  • Smokey the Smurf
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #37 on: August 26, 2010, 10:57:10 PM »
I guess I need to take the time to read more in here instead of just breeze thru threads. I didn't know there was a simliar thread that just got locked. But I do admit there has been a discussion(s) about it plenty of times before. The horse has been beat, mummified, and beat some more.
Started Atripla/Ziagen on 9/13/07.
10/31/07 CD4-265 VL- undetectable
2/6/08 CD4- 401 VL- undetectable
5/7/08 CD4- 705 VL- undetectable
6/4/08 CD4- 775 VL- undetectable
8/6/08 CD4- 805 VL- undetectable
11/13/08 CD4- 774 VL--undetectable
2/4/09  CD4- 484  VL- 18,000 (2 months off meds)
3/3/09---Starting Back on Meds---
4/27/09 CD4- 664 VL-- undetectable
6/17/09 CD4- 438 VL- 439
8/09 CD4- 404 VL- 1,600
01-22-10-- CD4- 525 VL- 59,000
Cherish the simple things life has to offer

The Royal Blog

Offline joemutt

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,042
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #38 on: August 26, 2010, 11:42:30 PM »
the correct name of the tread is 'the attempts at criminalizing non-disclosure' not 'the crime of non-disclosure'.

Granny60

  • Guest
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #39 on: August 27, 2010, 12:07:50 AM »
Unfortunately for some newly diagnosed,  people changing states,  and  those like myself who live in the boonies and had to find out about HIV on their own long before knowing about POZ or case management or any other crap, this is a relevant subject if they don't know. POZ is  not just for mindless bantor  for some of us that still need a sense of community and comradery,  but for for some  a resource.   A link on Lessons with a side note that the info may be dated or subject to change as laws  change might help people who DON'T YET KNOW EVERYTHING.  Please be nice.

http://www.hivlawandpolicy.org/resources/view/198

 State Criminal Statutes on HIV Transmission, Lambda Legal
 * Criminal Law
       Resource Type
    Compilations of Laws and Cases  
Description

    This chart, updated in August 2009, includes state-by-state information on criminal laws related to exposure and transmission of HIV for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Information includes statutory and regulatory citations, crime classification, summaries of laws, and additional notes.

edit 11:09 P.M because I can't feakin spell tonight.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2010, 12:10:25 AM by Granny60 »

Online Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,076
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #40 on: August 27, 2010, 12:28:02 AM »
Your link doesn't seem to show anything for Texas, so... since that's the actual topic of this thread at best it's unclear for the OP.

Also, for Trey, it seems that Louisiana allows you to have sex without disclosure if you utilize a condom.  There's no feasible "intentional exposure" if you do that, correct?  Missouri seems draconian like Granny previously stated, like Iowa.

Still to make a blanket statement that this is "the standard in most states" is a diservice to our forum readers in other states.  One should also keep in mind the relative effect on all HIV+ people in the US, meaning which states have the largest concentration of pozzies, at least in the context of a message board.
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Granny60

  • Guest
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #41 on: August 27, 2010, 12:43:20 AM »
Texas Criminal code among way to many pages to post here
   Sec. 81.066. CONCEALING COMMUNICABLE DISEASE OR EXPOSURE TO COMMUNICABLE DISEASE; CRIMINAL PENALTY

Online Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,076
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #42 on: August 27, 2010, 12:48:48 AM »
Texas Criminal code among way to many pages to post here
   Sec. 81.066. CONCEALING COMMUNICABLE DISEASE OR EXPOSURE TO COMMUNICABLE DISEASE; CRIMINAL PENALTY

A condom prevents exposure last time I heard -- what you're posting isn't clear with intent.
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Granny60

  • Guest
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #43 on: August 27, 2010, 01:38:37 AM »
I emailed my sister in texas  and asked her who texted her neighbor down the street who is an attorney and I have copy and pasted the  reply:
   There are a number of statutes dealing with communicable disease and some that specifically pertain to HIV or Acquired Immune Disease but this is not really my area of expertise. Counties are also allowed to write their own laws. Most prosecutors would probably prefer to prosecute along the line of endangering the welfare or attempted murder to obtain an easy conviction and use enough scare tactics that a judge or jury would convict the offender to insure their own little tramp at home might never be exposed.  This is Texas; if they could get away with it they would probably just use "  I thought he was breaking in , so I just shot him"  if they could get away with it. L.O.L. I can ask Hank if you really need to know or link you to specific statutes.  I hope this is just a curiosity matter and not a need to know. So you have one less football player with one off to college.  Wow.

Offline dvinemstre

  • Member
  • Posts: 96
  • hot in carolina
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #44 on: August 27, 2010, 09:24:03 AM »
Taking this from a slightly different angle, if any of you have read the President's HIV/AIDS plan for the US which was signed this summer, I have to point out the MAIN issue it outlines with there being criminalization laws on the books in many states. THE CRIMINALIZATION , lawsuits, etc ONLY can be "enforced" if there was INTENT. One of the biggest issues is that people do not want to know and therefore do not get tested. so 1) if I do not know I'm Poz I can not have intent, which means 2) I can fuck myself and everyone in the universe silly, bareback, raw, whatever, and NEVEr have intent, 3) ANY criminalization laws DETER people from being testing and knowing their status. This then leads to lack of health care and monitoring for persons who are + and could benefit from early detection and intervention. I am contiinually amazed by people who do not think twice about having random unprotected sex and NEVER getting any STI tests, period. And for the record I am a middle ages straight female. The report also points out that the "intentional" - note intent- act to infect another is very low and persons who know they are + typically are quite safe in their sexual dealings, disclosure or not. SO it seems to me that knowing there are criminalization laws is just as important as knowing there are travel bans and other things in different parts of the US and global community. I really hate that disclosure is an ongoing source of discord here and for some of us (myself included) a sticky hot mess of an issue...which changes depending on how much shit I have gotten served that day, week, year, how horny I am , and the partner in question. HOWEVER< condoms ALWAYS apply. thanks for reading. z

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #45 on: August 27, 2010, 11:35:54 AM »

I didn't see the locked thread.  So I certainly didn't create a flame war there, and am not inviting one here.

What, you didn't see a thread you posted in over thirty times? Now I understand some of your responses - you don't read what you're responding to cuz you got your eyes closed or summat.


Most people here know my stance on the criminalisation of hiv - it's criminal. The laws, that is. It's a bad idea on so many levels.

While it feels like beating a dead horse to many here, it's new territory for many as well. So have at it - and I say that with some reluctance.

To agree to having unprotected anal or vaginal intercourse is to agree to the possibility of being infected with hiv or any other STI. It's your body, it's your responsibility, so forget about prosecuting the other person for what is essentially your own mistake.
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,657
  • red pill? or blue pill?
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #46 on: August 27, 2010, 01:04:33 PM »
What, you didn't see a thread you posted in over thirty times? Now I understand some of your responses - you don't read what you're responding to cuz you got your eyes closed or summat.

Someone here referred to a thread of "a week ago" that was locked. As Hellraiser also confirmed, we didnt think of this one that started a few months ago.  I hadn't returned to that thread after it started going down hill.  AND i repeat, I don't flame.

Ann, I read what I write and I don't need you, a moderator, "mobbing" on me as well.  Stop it.
“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #47 on: August 27, 2010, 01:22:29 PM »
Ann, I read what I write and I don't need you, a moderator, "mobbing" on me as well.  Stop it.

I didn't say you don't read what you write, I said you don't read what you're responding to. And I'm not mobbing on you. As if.
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  



"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline Rev. Moon

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,782
  • Smart ass faggot ©
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #48 on: August 27, 2010, 03:04:58 PM »
Draaaaahhhma llama! 

The Academy Awards are still six months away. Chill out.
"I have tried hard--but life is difficult, and I am a very useless person. I can hardly be said to have an independent existence. I was just a screw or a cog in the great machine I called life, and when I dropped out of it I found I was of no use anywhere else."

Offline Joe K

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 3,660
  • 31 Years Poz
How Non-Disclosure of poz status, before sex, can be a crime in some areas
« Reply #49 on: August 27, 2010, 04:15:41 PM »
I think this thread could have been very effective, if it was titled correctly. Non-disclosure of being HIV+ has almost no bearing on anything, until it involves personal contact with another person. By titling the thread as "The crime of non-disclosure" it implies that all non-disclosure is a crime and my first reaction was WTF? Even after reading the OPs source, while I understood the nature of the thread, the title remains an insult to poz people everywhere.

Ah, three such very unhopeful responses.

If it's not for you, don't come back here.

I posted it to give information for people more naive about the issue then yourselves. I didn't insult anyone. The German story is very much in the news.

P.S. if its in the wrong section, the moderators can move it. Keep your vulgar mouth to yourself, MTD.  

I submit, that you have insulted members of this forum, as evidenced by some of the responses you received. You may not think you insulted anyone, but you did and while I am sure it was unintentional, the fact remains that you insulted some members. Your failure to acknowledge this issue, just furthers hard feelings amongst members, because we are supposed to be sensitive towards each other. Your cavalier dismissal of the feelings, that this thread generated, coupled with the incorrect title, have served to once again bring hurt to some members, while diluting any initial message beyond being effective.

Edited to add: Please notice the title I chose for this thread, as shown above. Do you think members would have responded the same way, to that title?
« Last Edit: August 27, 2010, 04:30:47 PM by killfoile »

Offline Boze

  • Member
  • Posts: 477
Re: The crime of non-disclosure - a new thread.
« Reply #50 on: August 27, 2010, 05:14:26 PM »
For the record, I will not argue my position here :)

Texas dude - all I did was pipe up in defense of someone who was trying to help you out. If I wanted to insult you, I would have 50 different ways of doing that. But I'm a peaceful dude and have no bone to pick.
==========
Aug08 - Seroconversion
Mar10 - Diagnosis; cd4 690 - VL 19,000
Apr10 - cd4 600
May10 - VL 4,500
Jun10 - started Atripla ; VL 113
Jul 10 - UD vl, CD4 590
Aug 10 - UD, CD4 810, 52%
Nov 10 - UD, CD4 980

Offline mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,657
  • red pill? or blue pill?
Killfollie,
I dont mind in the least changing the title. I didn't even know it was possible, after the fact.
Is this one better?
If my wording confused you and or offended you, or anyone, I'm sorry. 
“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

Offline mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,657
  • red pill? or blue pill?
Actually I was not inspired by the texas newbie, specifically, to write this post, since I posted the information in his thread.  Sorry Texas Stud, it certainly is not me singling you out.

I was inspired by the topic coming up in a number of different threads here, and this weeks news stories about the prosecutions. 
“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

Offline leatherman

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,184
  • Google and HIV meds are Your Friends
for more information/research, aidsmap.com has a lengthy section about "HIV and the Criminal Law" (http://www.aidsmap.com/law) that touches on many of the issues, from this thread, in the US and around the world
leatherman (aka mIkIE)


chart from 1992-2013; updated 2/09/13  Reyataz/Norvir/Truvada

Offline Stanley5739

  • Member
  • Posts: 14
  • Trying to make my way and help
With some trepidation, I will speak up as a newbie that this thread and having these links is useful.  I guess I could focus my research on the topic and found them but the fact is that the Living With HIV forum is where I routinely go for information that may be useful, comforting or sobering.  And there is a lot, so very much, I am still processing and re-processing.  So I am not not the Jedi master that so many here are.  I have seen articles and blogs from time to time but having these sources and being reminded of these sources is just information.  It seemed that was the spirit in starting this thread.  I may never, ever be in the situation again where disclosure is a step/issue/worry, but the topic is a reality and I don't see ill will or stupidity as reminding newbies that it's there.

Okay, now I will start to put on my heat-resistant suit.
07/15/10 VL Undetectable, CD4 count 634, CD4 21%
06/02/10 VL Undetectable, CD4 count 544, CD4 30%,  BP 133/88
04/23/2010 VL 184, CD4 count 744, CD4 26%,
03/01/2010 VL 106, CD4 count 744, CD4 26%,    
01/21/2010 VL 85, CD4 count 531, CD4 23%
12/14/2009 VL 50, CD4 count 470   
11/04/2009 VL 18,199, CD4 count 686, CD4 23% - Began Atripla
10/05/2009 VL 60,565, CD4 count 758, CD4 27%   
09/09/2009 VL 323,000, CD4 count 545, CD4 18% - Tested positive

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Ninja Please
Okay, now I will start to put on my heat-resistant suit.

Nope. You're gonna have to do better than that if you wanna get flamed around these here parts. :P

MtD

Offline tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,872
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #56 on: September 01, 2010, 11:39:02 PM »
I didn't want to create a new thread for this as there seem to be so many lately.  I was just reading that an Air Force Sergeant was arrested for allegedly exposing several people to the virus at swinger parties.  I thought all military members were tested every 6 months and if you were poz, you could no longer serve.  Maybe I'm mistaken.  The article didn't say he was a former member of the military.  It would be good to hear more details about this.

http://www.poz.com/articles/HIV_sergeant_swingers_1_19027.shtml

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Ninja Please
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #57 on: September 02, 2010, 12:24:27 AM »
I didn't want to create a new thread for this as there seem to be so many lately.  I was just reading that an Air Force Sergeant was arrested for allegedly exposing several people to the virus at swinger parties.  I thought all military members were tested every 6 months and if you were poz, you could no longer serve.  Maybe I'm mistaken.  The article didn't say he was a former member of the military.  It would be good to hear more details about this.

http://www.poz.com/articles/HIV_sergeant_swingers_1_19027.shtml


MtD

Offline tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,872
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #58 on: September 02, 2010, 12:29:29 AM »

MtD

Very true it seems.  Is that a real pic of those a-holes?

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Ninja Please
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #59 on: September 02, 2010, 12:32:09 AM »
Very true it seems.  Is that a real pic of those a-holes?

I can't tell Teddy. The masks seem to be covering their assholes. o.O

Which assholes do you mean?

MtD

Online Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 24,076
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #60 on: September 02, 2010, 12:41:59 AM »
Very true it seems.  Is that a real pic of those a-holes?

OLD NEWS
"I’ve slept with enough men to know that I’m not gay"

Offline tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,872
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #61 on: September 02, 2010, 12:43:09 AM »
I can't tell Teddy. The masks seem to be covering their assholes. o.O

Which assholes do you mean?

MtD

Isn't that Heidi and Spencer?  Looks like them.  

Offline Rev. Moon

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,782
  • Smart ass faggot ©
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #62 on: September 02, 2010, 12:59:31 AM »
Isn't that Heidi and Spencer?  Looks like them.  

It is them two. That pic was a while ago. I believe they're not even together anymore?
"I have tried hard--but life is difficult, and I am a very useless person. I can hardly be said to have an independent existence. I was just a screw or a cog in the great machine I called life, and when I dropped out of it I found I was of no use anywhere else."

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,705
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #63 on: September 02, 2010, 01:18:48 AM »


  Yummmm Heidi's got issues.. skeebo likes girls with issues.
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Ninja Please
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #64 on: September 02, 2010, 01:32:09 AM »

skeebo likes girls with issues.

. . . and other things too, I'm told. :)

MtD

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,705
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #65 on: September 02, 2010, 01:34:46 AM »
. . . and other things too, I'm told. :)

MtD

with crackers...
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline Hellraiser

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,136
  • Semi-misanthropic
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #66 on: September 02, 2010, 01:48:17 AM »
It is them two. That pic was a while ago. I believe they're not even together anymore?

OMG, Shoes!

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,705
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline Hellraiser

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,136
  • Semi-misanthropic

Offline mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,657
  • red pill? or blue pill?
“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,705
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline Hellraiser

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,136
  • Semi-misanthropic
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #71 on: September 02, 2010, 01:18:26 PM »
Trey I want my two minutes backl....

No sir, you're going to get your gay education one way or another even if I have to spoonfeed it to you.

next up...

Leslie Hall, "This is How We Go Out"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8WoyPEVRFo

Offline tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,872
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #72 on: September 03, 2010, 03:15:43 AM »
POZ Magazine founder, Sean Strub, talks about the legal issues with disclosure in this video interview.  He talks about being able to prove you disclosed.  With people serving what could be basically life sentences for spitting on someone or sex with a condom, I'm starting to think my idea (not mine alone) about video taping the disclosure isn't a bad idea.

http://www.thebody.com/content/art58262.html

Offline bocker3

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,386
  • You gotta enjoy life......
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #73 on: September 03, 2010, 07:40:04 AM »
I thought all military members were tested every 6 months and if you were poz, you could no longer serve.  Maybe I'm mistaken. 

You are mistaken.  If you test positive while in the service, you are barred from serving outside the US, but you can continue in the military.  You can NOT, however, join the military if poz.

Mike
Atripla - Started 12/05
Reyataz/Norvir - Added 6/06
Labs - Pre-Meds
Sep05 T=350/25% VL98,559
Nov05 288/18%  47,564
Current Labs
May2013 691/31% <20

Offline foreveryoung79

  • Member
  • Posts: 7
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #74 on: September 09, 2010, 04:46:04 PM »
i didnt read all the posts cuz they were too long, but i must say this. weather you feel like a criminal or not has no bearing on being hauled away to jail. im a newby here and this is a very good thread (apart from the angry people who dont want it up). well news for you i needed this info. i was just diagnosed, and afterwards i went and hooked up with this dude thru craigslist (am i allowed to reference other websites here?). we used protection so i didnt think it was a big deal cuz i wasnt putting him at risk then he found one of my profiles on a hook up site that i sometimes use and it lists me as poz. so he texted me all freaked out and asked why i didnt tell him. i appologised but i knew he wasnt put at risk so i didnt really think about it again. until i heard about criminal law suits being filed for the same thing i did. needless to say im not sure if i should contact him and reappologise and make sure were cool or forget about it and just hope that a cop never shows up asking for me.
so ya see its VERY important to those of us newbies who dont wanna go to jail. now any advice please?

Offline mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,657
  • red pill? or blue pill?
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #75 on: September 09, 2010, 06:06:02 PM »
so ya see its VERY important to those of us newbies who dont wanna go to jail. now any advice please?

Glad you found the thread useful!

I suppose I can only offer advice on your fear of being arrested. That would be of course to inform yourself on the laws in the state in which you are having sex.  Then make an informed decision on your disclosure practices.

______
(The question of whether to disclose or not - as pertains to your own morality - is up to you and another topic for another thread. There are lots of them here.  ::)

As for the specific instance you presented, I wouldn't contact him again.  No more "apology" needed.  If a similar situation presented again in the future, I think its a good idea to lower the hysteria and emotional outrage, and not be confrontational, but simply acknowledge the persons fear and claim there was no risk and give the person a suggestion how to look up such information him/herself for reassurance."

“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

Offline newt

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,885
  • the one and original newt
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #76 on: September 09, 2010, 06:29:35 PM »
And people might like to write a few letters to senator, local politicians and the like about the injustice of HIV exposure and transmission laws, and the disproportionate sentences handed down by judges etc.

Or are we all gonna hide in the HIV criminalisation/disclosure closet?

Advocacy and change begins at home, in yer bedroom, in yer local park etc.

- matt
"The object is to be a well patient, not a good patient"

Offline tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,872
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #77 on: September 09, 2010, 10:53:15 PM »
i didnt read all the posts cuz they were too long, but i must say this. weather you feel like a criminal or not has no bearing on being hauled away to jail. im a newby here and this is a very good thread (apart from the angry people who dont want it up). well news for you i needed this info. i was just diagnosed, and afterwards i went and hooked up with this dude thru craigslist (am i allowed to reference other websites here?). we used protection so i didnt think it was a big deal cuz i wasnt putting him at risk then he found one of my profiles on a hook up site that i sometimes use and it lists me as poz. so he texted me all freaked out and asked why i didnt tell him. i appologised but i knew he wasnt put at risk so i didnt really think about it again. until i heard about criminal law suits being filed for the same thing i did. needless to say im not sure if i should contact him and reappologise and make sure were cool or forget about it and just hope that a cop never shows up asking for me.
so ya see its VERY important to those of us newbies who dont wanna go to jail. now any advice please?

As a legal matter, I would not say anything in the form of an apology that could be used against you.  Now, that might not be the moral thing to do, but with all these prosecutions, you would be better served to not say anything that could be used against you.

Offline jkinatl2

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,007
  • Doo. Dah. Dipp-ity.
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #78 on: September 09, 2010, 11:26:59 PM »
i didnt read all the posts cuz they were too long

I am sorry, I did not read further than this line, because it was too long. I strongly suspect that the information you seek, or at least links to it, are found in one of the messages you skipped.

It is a shame that one of your first acts upon entering this forum is to critique the members and it's threads, especially a thread in which you seem to have actual personal investment.

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

-Kimberly Page-Shafer, PhD, MPH

Welcome Thread

Offline tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,872
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #79 on: September 10, 2010, 01:14:17 AM »
I am sorry, I did not read further than this line, because it was too long. I strongly suspect that the information you seek, or at least links to it, are found in one of the messages you skipped.

It is a shame that one of your first acts upon entering this forum is to critique the members and it's threads, especially a thread in which you seem to have actual personal investment.



I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt that he didn't mean it that way.  Maybe he meant he was really busy at work when reading this and the posts were too long to read all them now but he'll read them later???  Sometimes people can say things that don't come out the way they meant.  But, maybe he meant it exactly like he said it.   

Offline Joe K

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 3,660
  • 31 Years Poz
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #80 on: September 10, 2010, 12:20:59 PM »
i didnt read all the posts cuz they were too long, but i must say this. weather you feel like a criminal or not has no bearing on being hauled away to jail. im a newby here and this is a very good thread (apart from the angry people who dont want it up). well news for you i needed this info. i was just diagnosed, and afterwards i went and hooked up with this dude thru craigslist (am i allowed to reference other websites here?). we used protection so i didnt think it was a big deal cuz i wasnt putting him at risk then he found one of my profiles on a hook up site that i sometimes use and it lists me as poz. so he texted me all freaked out and asked why i didnt tell him. i appologised but i knew he wasnt put at risk so i didnt really think about it again. until i heard about criminal law suits being filed for the same thing i did. needless to say im not sure if i should contact him and reappologise and make sure were cool or forget about it and just hope that a cop never shows up asking for me.
so ya see its VERY important to those of us newbies who dont wanna go to jail. now any advice please?

The only advice I have for you is to read an entire thread, before you slam the people posting in it. Nobody has a problem with disclosure issues being discussed, but we do have a problem when they are done incorrectly or in a hurtful fashion. If you had bothered to read the thread, you would see that the issue was with HOW the information was presented, which was essentially that non-disclosure of your status was illegal and that is simply not true. The thread has since been retitled, to accurately reflect the topic at hand, because our issue with the original post was it implied that non-disclosure of status was criminal, period. Not that non-disclosure of your status, prior to sex, can be criminal depending upon where you live.

Now do you see how your comments were unwarranted? I hope so. Water under the bridge and welcome to the forums.

Offline skeebo1969

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,705
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #81 on: September 10, 2010, 04:42:40 PM »


 (Mechh)



 (Thread)
I despise the song Love is in the Air, you should too.

Offline mecch

  • Member
  • Posts: 11,657
  • red pill? or blue pill?
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #82 on: September 10, 2010, 06:27:13 PM »
LOL
How very Swissappropriate.  I know a lot of monsters in Geneva (and I've created none of them!).
“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need” 1875 K Marx

Offline mpositive

  • Member
  • Posts: 297
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #83 on: September 14, 2010, 07:00:58 AM »
Not sure I understand why everyone is attacking each other about this thread....as to whether or not it should have been posted.  Everyone has the freedom to read something or not.  I appreciate pretty much every thread on these forums, regardless of whether or not I agree with there theme. The only time I would want a post censored is if it is aimed at attacking an individual or group. 
Personally, I would not have sex without disclosing, but that is my choice.  That being said, folks, either read this or ignore it.  Much love and respect to all......
Mpositive

Offline dixieman

  • Member
  • Posts: 889
Re: Some states prosecute non-disclosure of HIV during sex. Know your risks.
« Reply #84 on: September 14, 2010, 04:38:29 PM »
I just wanted to say... I think this thread is appropriate... although the issue is something I'd rather not want to think about... but, Ignorance to the laws being passed in tthe United States and countries all over the world... I am thankful for the Links  posted by other members... for Information! This is one reason that I only date? poz men... unfortunately few if any around my area are what I'm seeking? so
I only have sex with myself? and no... I am not willing to disclose to myself either...lol it would be nice to have a another hiv+ infected partner in my life... until then its just me??? life goes on...

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.