Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 26, 2014, 11:11:26 AM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 631935
  • Total Topics: 47841
  • Online Today: 247
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Viral Load Lab Problems  (Read 830 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,760
Viral Load Lab Problems
« on: August 22, 2010, 02:08:43 AM »
I went to the HIV doc the other day for a problem going on with my mouth.  I would like to ask you guys about that issue and possibly show a pic, but I don't want to put too many issues into one post.  Maybe I'll create a separate post for that.

Anyway, while waiting in the room, I could hear the lab director updating my doc on an issue with viral load testing which he said was also affecting genotype testing.  I asked my doc about what I heard.  They have noticed patients who get their viral load testing done at the university lab (where the HIV clinic is) often have viral loads that jump up from undetectable--some just a few points, but some much higher.  This is in stark contrast to patients who get their labs done at Labcorp--even the same patients who were detectable under their lab but UD under Labcorp's lab.  The lab guy said this may be due to initial freezing of the specimens that are sent to a lab in Atlanta.  He also talked about using "the white tubes vs the purple tubes."  I still don't know what that means. 

My doc said this not only causes psychological stress to patients, but could prevent them from participating in studies where you have to be UD.  The bottom line is that they believe the lab at the HIV clinic is many times causing viral loads to be higher than they actually are and they also said this issue or series of issues is/can affect genotype assays.  I asked whether my viral load could actually be lower than it is saying.  Doc said possibly, but this problem is mainly an issue for those on meds with UD viral loads that are bouncing around.  I should have asked whether they believe this problem has caused any to switch regimens thinking it wasn't working.  They are now starting a study of patients at random to prove their hypothesis.  It is good they have discovered the problem and are taking action to remedy it. 

I just thought this was interesting and made me think about the stories we hear where people say they are completely adherent but either can't get all the way undetectable or it will bounce back up.

Update:

I mentioned this to Dr. Gallant in a post to him from someone who says he is 100% adherent, but his/her vl jumps to 500.  Below is what he said about what I just wrote to you guys.

On Aug 20, 2010 Joel E. Gallant, M.D., M.P.H. replied:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There was a problem several years ago with incorrect processing of viral load specimens, which resulted in falsely elevated results. The problem was that labs were centrifugin plasma preparation tubes (PPT) and then freezing them without first separating the plasma from the cells. It was believed that virus from the cellular component somehow made its way into the plasma and got counted as plasma virus.

The correct way to process a viral load sample is either with a PPT tube or an EDTA tube, where you first centrifuge the tube, and then remove the plasma before freezing it. This has been known now for several years, and all the labs I know have switched to this method. If a lab is still doing it the wrong way, that's concerning.

The full Q&A:  http://www.hopkins-hivguide.org//q_a/patient/recent_questions/worried_guy_continued.html?contentInstanceId=533469&siteId=7151   

Granny60

  • Guest
Re: Viral Load Lab Problems
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2010, 11:52:13 AM »
I do believe that the way labs handle the samples or analyze them can make a difference.  Hubby had to change to LabCorp from Quest because his thieving insurance company refused to pay Quest and we had $30 some thousand in outstanding bills from them.  The LabCorp tests were a disaster!  His testosterone was all over the place bouncing up and down  by 300 points,   Cd4 would go down then up , then down,  They would call and tell  him  to come back in  ( as many as 3 times)  stating they were unable to get the CD4 or viral load. Sometimes they would call to come back because they said they lost the results. We know another person that this has happened to also. Thankfully we got the insurance issue taken care of and he gets to go to a reliable lab again. We don't need any more WTF?  in our lives.

Online Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 23,884
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: Viral Load Lab Problems
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2010, 12:15:52 PM »
I've used both LabCorps and Quest and never had any issue.
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.