Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 02, 2014, 06:44:58 PM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
  • Total Members: 23377
  • Latest: Stevieb
Stats
  • Total Posts: 636930
  • Total Topics: 48346
  • Online Today: 304
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: CARE Act Update from San Francisco AIDS Foundation  (Read 1046 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Oceanbeach

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,565
CARE Act Update from San Francisco AIDS Foundation
« on: August 01, 2006, 09:54:53 AM »
You can read the entire document at http://www.sfaf.org/policy/pw/2006_7.html#1

Appropriations bills in limbo until after November election
-Funding increases to AIDS Programs at risk-

Last winter, the Republican leadership of Congress provided assurances that the 12 appropriations bills that fund the federal government would be approved well before the November 2006 belections.  However, the debilitating battle over budget levels and funding priorities in the House, fostered by moderate Republicans challenging the Bush Administration, dashed those expectations by mid-spring.

As usual, one of the most contentious issues before Congress is the Labor-Health and Human Services-Education Appropriations bill, which funds the majority of HIV/AIDS programs.  The Bush Administration exacerbated traditional problems with the bill by proposing funding well below current levels.  The Senate subsequently added $7 billion to the appropriation and the House added $4 billion.  The fact that a House and Senate Conference Committee must reconcile these differing appropriations places the funding levels of each of the programs covered by the bill in question.  It is now clear that the conference committee will not even meet to discuss these issues until the lame duck session of the 109th Congress begins after the November 2006 election.
Have the best day
Michael
(who is simply too tired to type a 3 page document)


Offline JR Gabbard

  • Member
  • Posts: 254
  • Union Jacks
Re: CARE Act Update from San Francisco AIDS Foundation
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2006, 11:37:10 AM »
Hi Michael--

I want to post the rest of that article, because when I read it I was stunned.  Although, why I was stunned is a mystery to me, having watched these "compassionate" conservatives for way too many years now.  I have seen what they are capable of.

Anyway, it deserves wider visibility.

J.R.

From the article referenced above:

Fortunately, the House and Senate prioritized HIV/AIDS programs for increases in their respective versions of the Labor-HHS appropriations bill. The House followed the lead of the Bush Administration by increasing Title II of the CARE Act by $70 million while flat-funding all other components of the Act. The Senate split the $70 million recommended by the Bush Administration, giving a $55 million increase to the AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) and $15 million to the Title II base. In addition, the Senate increased the other Titles of the CARE Act by $7 million overall. HIV prevention and surveillance programs at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were increased by $55 million to $706.3 million, $38 million less than the Bush Administration recommended. The House increased the Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS program (HOPWA) by $14 million to a total of $300 million at the recommendation of the Bush Administration. Unfortunately, the Senate only approved $9 million of the $14 million requested by the Administration and approved by the House, leaving a $5 million discrepancy to be resolved during the conference process.




The bad news for proposed increases to both HIV/AIDS and other health programs is that they are built on funding gimmicks designed to help congressional members appear to be supportive of health programs in the November election. There is a strong belief that during the conference committee process, the billions in funding redirected from the Defense appropriations bill to the Labor-HHS Appropriations bill will be returned to Defense. Such a shift would require significant cuts to Labor-HHS programs.

It goes like this
The fourth, the fifth,
The minor fall, the major lift,
The baffled king composing Hallelujah!

L. Cohen

Offline Oceanbeach

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,565
Re: CARE Act Update from San Francisco AIDS Foundation
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2006, 02:34:01 PM »
Thank you J.R.

I'm not feeling very goor right now but I often post an article in its entirety.  I received a similar article from Craig Vincent-Jones of the Los Angeles County Counsil on HIV, and the consulting firm Susan Strong Consulting who represents the Nine California Title I EMA's.  I have given them a link to my personal web site www.Commission-on-AIDS.org.  The Nine EMA's have been invited to write compelling articles and forward them to me to be included in this site.

As of last night my site has attracted 56,296 hits and 3,681 sessions (an average of 20 per day) since December 1, 2005.  The weekly reports show a consistent referral from AIDSmeds.com.  They have been made aware that this is what I have done as a person living with HIV/AIDS and on disability.  Have the best day
Michael

 

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.