Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 28, 2014, 04:11:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
  • Total Members: 23059
  • Latest: dum@ss
Stats
  • Total Posts: 632119
  • Total Topics: 47863
  • Online Today: 257
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online
Users: 5
Guests: 207
Total: 212

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Truvada & re-infection: answer to JP's post in another thread  (Read 2158 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline newt

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,877
  • the one and original newt
In another thread JP wrote:

"I came here tonight doing some research on the general consensus regarding re-infection and/or superinfection and came across this particular thread.  So, let's assume, for the sake of argument, that Truvada does have some effectiveness in preventing HIV infection.  Two questions:

1.  What if one were to be exposed to a strain that was resistant to the drugs in Truvada?
2.  If one is on Truvada anyway (as I am), would that imply that you might be even less at risk of re-infection??

Discuss."

Discussion

1. You are at risk of acquiring a resistant strain and compromising your use of Truvada, and perhaps other similar drugs.

2. If you are on treatment you are probably at lower risk of re-infection (but see 1 above).

Acquisition of resistant strains of HIV by re-infection is rare.  There are a handful of document cases.  Even if there are, say, 1,000 times more cases than are recorded, it's still rare. 

Infection requires quantity, quality and opportunity.  Treatment reduces quantity and quality of the virus therefore reduces the chance of infection and re-infection.  Studies suggest that in some cases - steady straight couples - HIV will not be transmitted if viral load is below 1,500.  Whether this is true for (a) casual partners (b) gay men (ie anal sex - can we have a study please) is unknown.  But in any case treatment reduces viral load which reduces infectiousness.  Re-infection, whether with a resistant or non-resistant strain seems most likely in the 1st 3 years after initial infection. 

The closer your HIV infection and treatment history to the other person the less likely unprotected sex will result in a second HIV infection.  If you and the other person have the same HIV sub-type, have an undetectable viral load, use the same treatment and have the same treatment history then the chance is prob. ZERO.  The risk rises as you and the other person's HIV situation start to differ.  The biggest factor here is viral load.

For a good overview of the science to date see HIV Superinfection vs Dual Initial Infection: What Clinicians and Patients Should Know (Medscape article, require free registration).

Different people will fairly draw different conclusions based on the same evidence.

My doc is fairly strong on this, his view is that to people with undetectable viral load regardless of treatment pose each other no risk.  He is also strong on the view that HIV-positive men screwing (other HIV-positive men) without condoms should be more concerned about getting Hep C than a second HIV infection.

- matt
« Last Edit: February 16, 2007, 06:32:27 AM by newt »
"The object is to be a well patient, not a good patient"

Offline jp in la

  • member
  • Posts: 2
Re: Truvada & re-infection: answer to JP's post in another thread
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2006, 11:53:27 AM »
Great info.  Thanks Newt.  I've been reading a lot of your posts.  You're a real asset to this board.

Offline lydgate

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,022
  • Virgin, can't drive
Re: Truvada & re-infection: answer to JP's post in another thread
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2006, 12:18:49 PM »
Yup, I don't worry about re-infection/superinfection, but I do worry about Hep C. (Vaccinated for Hep A and B.) My doctor said essentially the same thing as Matt's.

This is a digression from the main topic (in other words a sort of hijack); I can re-post in another thread if necessary.

The Aidsmeds lesson on Hep C transmission:

http://www.aidsmeds.com/OIs/HCV2.htm

Article read last year:

http://www.aidsmap.com/en/news/F741093C-4F71-4684-8119-C5753CDB611C.asp

Not sure I understand this article completely, clarifications appreciated. And any other studies that people should know about?

Jay
Her finely-touched spirit had still its fine issues, though they were not widely visible. Her full nature, like that river of which Cyrus broke the strength, spent itself in channels which had no great name on the earth. But the effect of her being on those around her was incalculably diffusive: for the growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.

George Eliot, Middlemarch, final paragraph

Offline Cliff

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,645
Re: Truvada & re-infection: answer to JP's post in another thread
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2006, 08:22:37 PM »
To me it reads that while HCV can be transmitted sexually, it's not very common, (especially if you don't practice fisting).

Offline lydgate

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,022
  • Virgin, can't drive
Her finely-touched spirit had still its fine issues, though they were not widely visible. Her full nature, like that river of which Cyrus broke the strength, spent itself in channels which had no great name on the earth. But the effect of her being on those around her was incalculably diffusive: for the growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.

George Eliot, Middlemarch, final paragraph

Offline cjc

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,011
  • Sweet Girl
Re: Truvada & re-infection: answer to JP's post in another thread
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2006, 01:32:27 PM »
yes, i thought that was very interesting and I agree that Newt is a great asset to these forums.  Thanks.   Cristy

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.