Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 06, 2016, 03:22:34 AM

Login with username, password and session length

  • Total Members: 29667
  • Latest: Box
  • Total Posts: 704479
  • Total Topics: 56077
  • Online Today: 233
  • Online Ever: 1421
  • (August 13, 2016, 05:18:44 AM)
Users Online
Users: 5
Guests: 210
Total: 215


Welcome to the POZ Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Welcome to Am I Infected

Welcome to the "Am I Infected?" POZ forum.

New members -- those who have posted three or fewer messages -- are permitted to post questions and responses, free of charge (make them count!). Ongoing participation in the "Am I Infected?" forum -- posting more than three questions or responses -- requires a paid subscription.

A seven-day subscription is $9.99, a 30-day subscription is $14.99 and a 90-day subscription is $24.99.

Anyone who needs to post more than three messages in the "Am I Infected?" forum -- including past, present and future POZ Forums members -- will need to subscribe, with secure payments made via PayPal.

There will be no charge to continue reading threads in the "Am I Infected?" forum, nor will there be a charge for participating in any of the Main Forums; Meds, Mind, Body & Benefits; and Off Topic Forums. Similarly, all POZ pages, including our "HIV Transmission and Risks" and "Am I Infected? (A Guide to Testing for HIV)" basics, will remain accessible to all.

NOTE: HIV testing questions will still need to be posted in the "Am I Infected?" forum; attempts to post HIV symptoms or testing questions in any other forums will be considered violations of our rules of membership and subject to time-outs and permanent bans.

To learn how to upgrade your Forums account to participate beyond three posts in the "Am I Infected?" Forum, please click here.

Thank you for your understanding and future support of the best online support service for people living with, affected by and at risk for HIV.

Author Topic: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?  (Read 4439 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dumbmike

  • Member
  • Posts: 5
Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« on: December 22, 2007, 11:21:55 AM »
Can someone tell me if a Home Access test is accurate after 19 weeks from an unprotected anal exposure?
And is this test just as reliable as a Oraquick test?

Offline Andy Velez

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 29,918
Re: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2007, 11:33:50 AM »
It's an FDA-approved HIV test and yes, a negative at 13 weeks or anytime thereafter is a reliable result.

So at 19 weeks you are certainly HIV negative.

If you had a risky incident involving unprotected intercourse make sure you learn from this experience and always, ALWAYS use a condom in the future for either vaginal or anal intercourse.


Andy Velez

Offline dumbmike

  • Member
  • Posts: 5
Re: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2007, 09:56:36 AM »
Thank you for your reply.

I had ordered 2 test kits by accident through the company.
My friend, who also is gay, wanted to test and I wanted to give him the additional test for testing.
He states that his last risk was back in the first part of november.
Should I or should I give the test to him to test now? I had been reading that most people would test +ve by 6 weeks, so I am wanton to give him the test.
He did state that he was "bottom" (if you are aware of that term) and he did use  a condom. He performed oral on some guy...so I do not know if this is something to be tested for as well.

He too felt the same way I did, thinking that the Home tests are garbage, so I feel like he should test at a clinic or doctor's office.  My concern, as well as his, was the validity of the testing..and not knowing of a blood sample you have to send in through the mail.

Any comments or thoughts are or would be ideal. Thank you for this site.

Hope you all have  a good holiday.

Offline RapidRod

  • Member
  • Posts: 15,288
Re: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2007, 10:32:50 AM »
It's to early for him to get a conclusive test result and if he has always used a condom there is no reason for him to test.

Offline dumbmike

  • Member
  • Posts: 5
Re: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2007, 10:49:46 AM »

True. I have read here that 13 weeks in conclusive. I have also read through the "Read this first section".
I was curious to the answer of this question: 
I have seen Mr. Velez write "the vast majority of persons who will test +ve, will do so by 6 weeks, all but the smallest number will do so by 6 weeks".

Does this rule apply to him taking this Home Test at 6 weeks? Or should he wait the additional 6 weeks? I just do not know about how accurate the Home access test is in comparision to a regular blood test.

Gracias para su ayuda!

Offline RapidRod

  • Member
  • Posts: 15,288
Re: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2007, 11:31:49 AM »
He could take it tomorrow. He hasn't had a risk and doesn't need testing.

Offline Andy Velez

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 29,918
Re: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2007, 11:41:04 AM »
Condoms provide very effective protection. As far as your friend is concerned if he is certain he was HIV negative before this incident then there's really no need for him to get tested.

We do recommend in general that anyone who's sexually active ought to regularly have a full STD panel done. That means at least once a year.

13 weeks is the CDC's recommended testing point for a conclusive result.
Andy Velez

Offline dumbmike

  • Member
  • Posts: 5
Re: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2007, 10:38:58 AM »
Out of curiosity, can someone tell me the distinct difference between the Oraquick test and the Uni-Gold Triity test? And are they both as equally reliable tests?

Offline dumbmike

  • Member
  • Posts: 5
Re: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« Reply #8 on: December 26, 2007, 10:40:54 AM »
Sorry, that was meant to say "Uni-Gold Test" by Trinity..

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,140
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: Home Access at 19 weeks -Accurate?
« Reply #9 on: December 26, 2007, 10:47:47 AM »

Trinity's Uni-Gold test was approved by the FDA in 2004 so yes, it is a reliable test.

You tested hiv negative at nineteen weeks and this means you are conclusively hiv negative. You do not have hiv.

Use condoms for anal or vaginal intercourse, correctly and consistently, and you will continue to avoid hiv infection. It really is that simple! Read through all three condom and lube links in my signature line so you can use them with confidence.

Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts


Terms of Membership for these forums

© 2016 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.