Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 24, 2014, 10:11:42 AM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 621253
  • Total Topics: 46801
  • Online Today: 229
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online
Users: 7
Guests: 176
Total: 183

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Forget the soapbox and hand them a mirror? Or, why negs can bareback guilt free.  (Read 773 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Iggy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,435
There's an interesting study that came out from UCLA that indicates that having someone assess their own behavior is an effective way to reduce high risk sexual activities.  It indicates that exploring one's own behaviors is a cheap and effective way to get a person to realize if something they are doing is unhealthy (or at least something that causes them guilt) and if so, then provides them the impetus to change.

The study (linked below) has left me with mixed feelings.

I do applaud the overall idea of the study and have always felt that many anti-drug and anti-unsafe sex campaigns have failed because they focus on trying to be clever in how they shame or guilt a person about the respective subject matter vs. getting someone to honestly want to change  because they recognize that the activity is unhealthy or bad for them.  In other words telling someone to change is like telling a car to move - it  won't happen without an internal ignition.

However my issue with the study is that considering the behavior that is the subject of the questions for  the self assessment (sexual activities that can lead to HIV transmission)  I have questions as to why the focus is on HIV positive people. While I recognize that a long term study on neg people may have problems in guaranteeing that the subject pool remains neg for the entire study, it still seems that it would have been more worthwhile in studying if they could get neg people to use a condom every time to protect themselves - after all, they are the ones who are getting infected

I guess the whole thing bothers me as it is sort of reinforcing the idea that stopping HIV infections is the burden of the poz community and getting them to change their behavior vs. getting neg people to recognize that only they can prevent themselves from getting infected from an unsafe sex encounter.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=76189

Offline aztecan

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,358
  • 28 years positive, 56 years a pain in the butt
Hey Iggy,

I have to agree with you. So many of the "messages" regarding safer sex are aimed at the already infected and ignore the responsibility of both parties involved.

It is not unlike the barebacking clubs that are hell bent on all positive people behaving themselves so the barebackers don't have to shoulder any of the responsibility of protecting themselves.

Considering many of those who are being infected are catching the bug from people who don't know they have it, the idea is ludicrous and establishes a double standard.

HUGS,

Mark
"May your life preach more loudly than your lips."
~ William Ellery Channing (Unitarian Minister)

Offline Queen Tokelove

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,033
  • Smokey the Smurf
I feel you on both points, Iggy. I really don't see much hiv commercials where I am.I understand the point of them but in some ways it makes us poz people like the villians. I mean I know there are people out there that choose to spread it but what happened to people being responsible for their own actions? Then there are those that think they are invincible and it can never happen to them or just likes playing russian roulette..I really don't know the numbers here but where I am, it seems to be running wild in the younger generation and much of the black community tries to keep it on the low.

The drug commercials really burn my butt as you well know. I have yet to see one made where someone is hitting meth, smoking crack or sticking a needle in their arm. They always seem to be aimed at pot. I don't believe weed is a gateway drug as they say. I know people that had started using other drugs and never smoked weed. But it's ok to allow medicinal weed because those folks minds are already gone due Alzheimers or glucoma because they are already damn near blind, it just sounds ass backwards to me. What they should do is legalize weed but that's a whole different discussion....
Started Atripla/Ziagen on 9/13/07.
10/31/07 CD4-265 VL- undetectable
2/6/08 CD4- 401 VL- undetectable
5/7/08 CD4- 705 VL- undetectable
6/4/08 CD4- 775 VL- undetectable
8/6/08 CD4- 805 VL- undetectable
11/13/08 CD4- 774 VL--undetectable
2/4/09  CD4- 484  VL- 18,000 (2 months off meds)
3/3/09---Starting Back on Meds---
4/27/09 CD4- 664 VL-- undetectable
6/17/09 CD4- 438 VL- 439
8/09 CD4- 404 VL- 1,600
01-22-10-- CD4- 525 VL- 59,000
Cherish the simple things life has to offer

The Royal Blog

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.