Quantcast

Subscribe to:
POZ magazine
E-newsletters
Join POZ: Facebook MySpace Twitter Pinterest
Tumblr Google+ Flickr MySpace
POZ Personals
Sign In / Join
Username:
Password:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 20, 2014, 09:25:38 AM

Login with username, password and session length


Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 620462
  • Total Topics: 46751
  • Online Today: 191
  • Online Ever: 585
  • (January 07, 2014, 02:31:47 PM)
Users Online

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ/AIDSmeds Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Am I Infected?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ/AIDSmeds community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: boxers vs briefs..?  (Read 10028 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ihavehope

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,366
  • Yes, I'm a cry baby, AND WHAT?
boxers vs briefs..?
« on: March 24, 2007, 01:50:25 PM »
What do u ladies prefer wearing or in your men.

Boxers or briefs.

My package no longer can do briefs therefore I am a boxer boy and i like mis hombres on tight undies.
Infected: April 2005
12/6/06 - Diagnosed HIV positive
12/19/06 - CD4 = 240  22% VL = 26,300
1/4/07 - CD4 = 200 16% VL = ?
2/9/07 = Started Kaletra/Truvada
3/13/07 = CD4 = 386 22% VL ?

Offline milker

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,034
  • Protected phone sex
Re: boxers of briefs..?
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2007, 01:52:01 PM »
My package no longer can do briefs

 ??? ??? ??? What happened  ??? ??? ???

I don't wear underwear except when flying.

Milker.
mid-dec: stupid ass
mid-jan: seroconversion
mid-feb: poz
mar 07: cd4 432 (35%) vl 54000
may 07: cd4 399 (28%) vl 27760
jul 07: cd4 403 (26%) vl 99241
oct 07: cd4 353 (24%) vl 29993
jan 08: cd4 332 (26%) vl 33308
mar 08: cd4 392 (23%) vl 75548
jun 08: cd4 325 (27%) vl 45880
oct 08: cd4 197 (20%) vl 154000 <== aids diagnosis
nov 2 08 start Atripla
nov 30 08: cd4 478 (23%) vl 1880 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
feb 19 09: cd4 398 (24%) vl 430 getting there!
apr 23 09: cd4 604 (29%) vl 50 woohoo :D :D
jul 30 09: cd4 512 (29%) vl undetectable :D :D
may 27 10: cd4 655 (32%) vl undetectable :D :D

Now accepting applications from blowjob ninjasô

Offline Bucko

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,947
  • You need a shine, missy!
    • The Spin Cycle
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2007, 03:26:33 PM »
Like my pal Milkie, I prefer commando unless I'm at work, in which case briefs contain the boys very nicely, thanks.

Brent
(Who notices that jocks aren't one of the choices, although he hasn't worn one in years)
Blessed with brains, talent and gorgeous tits.

The revolutionary smart set reads The Spin Cycle at least once every day.

Blathering on AIDSmeds since 2005, provocative from birth

Offline thunter34

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,250
  • His name is Carl.
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2007, 03:40:47 PM »
I love underwear- on its own.  Commando most times otherwise.

Boxers or briefs?  How about jockstraps?
AIDS isn't for sissies.

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 23,565
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2007, 04:01:49 PM »
my currently wearing tight Brazilian jiu jits fight shorts around the house
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline CaptCarl

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Located in the Palinsville subdivision, JesusLand
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2007, 06:37:37 PM »
Commando style here!!
The only thing I can do straight is shoot..

Offline puertorico2006

  • Member
  • Posts: 957
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2007, 07:01:14 PM »
i like nice tight cute briefs....

i like my calvins and unicos....

and on other guys i prefer briefs or commando is nice lol
Infected Probably: may 2005
Diagnosed: 11/2006

11/28/2006 CD4:309 / VL: 1907 No meds yet
12/27/2006 CD4:339/  VL:1649 No meds yet
  4/28/2007 CD4:550/  VL:1800 No meds :-)

Offline Catman

  • Member
  • Posts: 419
  • Blessed with more than 9 lives! + since 1986
    • Who is the Catman?
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2007, 07:19:48 PM »
I like briefs because they cuddle my balls better. Nice and soft cotton is my favorite...any color, but I hate prints unless it's camouflage...I don't use boxers because the "movement" will get me pretty aroused and I don't want to be walking around with a semi-hard boner. I'm really sensitive down there...boxers do look good on other guys, though. And what is "commando" underwear? Post a picture anyone... ???
Catman

Meow to the birds
Meow to the tree's
Meow to the end
of this dreadful disease...

Offline Ihavehope

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,366
  • Yes, I'm a cry baby, AND WHAT?
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2007, 07:26:28 PM »
I like briefs because they cuddle my balls better. Nice and soft cotton is my favorite...any color, but I hate prints unless it's camouflage...I don't use boxers because the "movement" will get me pretty aroused and I don't want to be walking around with a semi-hard boner. I'm really sensitive down there...boxers do look good on other guys, though. And what is "commando" underwear? Post a picture anyone... ???

commando means no undies.

Infected: April 2005
12/6/06 - Diagnosed HIV positive
12/19/06 - CD4 = 240  22% VL = 26,300
1/4/07 - CD4 = 200 16% VL = ?
2/9/07 = Started Kaletra/Truvada
3/13/07 = CD4 = 386 22% VL ?

Offline thunter34

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,250
  • His name is Carl.
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #9 on: March 24, 2007, 07:36:31 PM »
and why is that called commando anyway?  free-balling, yes.  but commando?  what is commando about not wearing underwear?
AIDS isn't for sissies.

Offline Catman

  • Member
  • Posts: 419
  • Blessed with more than 9 lives! + since 1986
    • Who is the Catman?
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #10 on: March 24, 2007, 07:44:21 PM »
commando means no undies.


Lol. So I was asking for a pic of someone without underwear! Ha,ha. I had never heard of that word referring to "no undies" :D.
Catman

Meow to the birds
Meow to the tree's
Meow to the end
of this dreadful disease...

Offline dtwpuck

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,013
  • дано мне тело, что мне делать с ним?
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #11 on: March 24, 2007, 07:53:56 PM »
Since I moved to Michigan I stopped going commando in the winter.  But I have found that the more comfortable boxers do not always mitigate the

1. jewelry  and
2. my tendency to get hard at the slightest thing.

Floating through the void in the caress of two giant pink lobsters named Esmerelda and Keith.

Offline keypps

  • Member
  • Posts: 10
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2007, 08:02:10 PM »
For me it all depends on the outfit and occassion...I prefer my guys in briefs!

Offline cmhjeff

  • Member
  • Posts: 870
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #13 on: March 24, 2007, 08:53:49 PM »
I have a few jocks but definitely a boxer brief kind of guy. I like to be pointing north but Jeffrey always laughs at me about that. As for my guys I like them in just about anything as long as it comes off.

Jeff

Offline Just John

  • Member
  • Posts: 267
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #14 on: March 24, 2007, 08:56:50 PM »
Boxers in nice soft cotton or commando here.

As for my Guys-------------I like 'em in me!!! :D
Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go.

Offline tigger2376

  • Member
  • Posts: 462
  • too bad to die youngish!
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #15 on: March 24, 2007, 09:57:55 PM »
Butt hugging soft cotton, calvin style boxers..its nice to IMAGINE whats in the giftbox, and untie the ribbon slowly..with your teeth! ;D
My boyfriend goes commando (unless we go to dinner at his mums!).....bless :D
I know i'm going to enjoy the party in the afterlife, but do you all mind that I'm going to be VERY late!!!

Offline milker

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,034
  • Protected phone sex
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #16 on: March 24, 2007, 09:58:51 PM »
Butt hugging soft cotton

Butt hugging? Why didn't I use this as a nickname!

Milker
mid-dec: stupid ass
mid-jan: seroconversion
mid-feb: poz
mar 07: cd4 432 (35%) vl 54000
may 07: cd4 399 (28%) vl 27760
jul 07: cd4 403 (26%) vl 99241
oct 07: cd4 353 (24%) vl 29993
jan 08: cd4 332 (26%) vl 33308
mar 08: cd4 392 (23%) vl 75548
jun 08: cd4 325 (27%) vl 45880
oct 08: cd4 197 (20%) vl 154000 <== aids diagnosis
nov 2 08 start Atripla
nov 30 08: cd4 478 (23%) vl 1880 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
feb 19 09: cd4 398 (24%) vl 430 getting there!
apr 23 09: cd4 604 (29%) vl 50 woohoo :D :D
jul 30 09: cd4 512 (29%) vl undetectable :D :D
may 27 10: cd4 655 (32%) vl undetectable :D :D

Now accepting applications from blowjob ninjasô

Offline Amosboy

  • Member
  • Posts: 156
  • Music is the panacea.
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #17 on: March 24, 2007, 10:01:06 PM »
A pictures says a thousand words but I like to wear briefs.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2007, 06:59:16 PM by Amosboy »
"Love isn't love unless it's not painfully absurb."

-Charlotte Martin

Offline Queen Tokelove

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,033
  • Smokey the Smurf
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #18 on: March 24, 2007, 10:13:12 PM »
I use to wear boxers because they are more comfortable. I don't have any balls but would like my man in either but a nice ass does make briefs look even better.
Started Atripla/Ziagen on 9/13/07.
10/31/07 CD4-265 VL- undetectable
2/6/08 CD4- 401 VL- undetectable
5/7/08 CD4- 705 VL- undetectable
6/4/08 CD4- 775 VL- undetectable
8/6/08 CD4- 805 VL- undetectable
11/13/08 CD4- 774 VL--undetectable
2/4/09  CD4- 484  VL- 18,000 (2 months off meds)
3/3/09---Starting Back on Meds---
4/27/09 CD4- 664 VL-- undetectable
6/17/09 CD4- 438 VL- 439
8/09 CD4- 404 VL- 1,600
01-22-10-- CD4- 525 VL- 59,000
Cherish the simple things life has to offer

The Royal Blog

Offline edfu

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,084
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #19 on: March 25, 2007, 12:40:11 AM »
Obviously, all those who like going commando are not amongst the multitudes here who suffer from that great #1 HAART side effect:  diarrhea, or the squirts.  I would rather soil a pair of tighty whities than a pair of jeans or pants.     
"No one will ever be free so long as there are pestilences."--Albert Camus, "The Plague"

"Mankind can never be free until the last brick in the last church falls on the head of the last priest."--Voltaire

Offline Buckmark

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,475
  • Would you like to tie me up with your ties, Ty?
    • Henry's Home Page
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #20 on: March 25, 2007, 09:47:18 AM »
For me it is definitely boxers, not briefs. Have tried commando, but I just have too much hair all over that gets caught in zippers, buttons, seams, etc. , and I don't appreciate the pinching, pulling and snag.  Is this too much information?

Henry
"Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me two things:
     One is that God loves you and you're going to burn in hell.
     The other is that sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth and you should save it for someone you love."
- Butch Hancock, Musician, The Flatlanders

Offline thunter34

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,250
  • His name is Carl.
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #21 on: March 25, 2007, 10:05:17 AM »
For me it is definitely boxers, not briefs. Have tried commando, but I just have too much hair all over that gets caught in zippers, buttons, seams, etc. , and I don't appreciate the pinching, pulling and snag.  Is this too much information?

Henry

Or perhaps still not enough.    ;D


Mornin', Henry!
AIDS isn't for sissies.

Offline Buckmark

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,475
  • Would you like to tie me up with your ties, Ty?
    • Henry's Home Page
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #22 on: March 25, 2007, 10:50:04 AM »
Basically, having a hairy butt just isn't a good match for commando, IMHO.

Any additional information will have to be disclosed in person.  In that regard, I'd be happy to provide you with a full report, Tim.  ;)

Cheers,

Henry


"Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me two things:
     One is that God loves you and you're going to burn in hell.
     The other is that sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth and you should save it for someone you love."
- Butch Hancock, Musician, The Flatlanders

Offline GSOgymrat

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,962
  • HIV+ since 1993. INTJ
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #23 on: March 25, 2007, 11:40:57 AM »
I wear briefs most of the time as I prefer to avoid unsightly bulges in public. I wear boxers with certain slacks and I sometimes wear nothing at home. My brother talked me into trying boxer briefs and I hate them. They start out okay but eventually end up bunched up over my quads and hamstrings. Anyone else experience this?

Offline CaptCarl

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,114
  • Located in the Palinsville subdivision, JesusLand
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #24 on: March 25, 2007, 12:37:36 PM »
Ford,
    Bulges in public are never unsightly, as long as they are protruding fome the proper area of the body. After thinking a lot about this post, I realize that two things. A) No one has commented on the phenomenon of boxer-briefs, and B) I really don't care what kind of underwear a guy is wearing, as long as it comes off easily ;D

Capt.Carl  (whose off to Home Depot to figure out who is wearing what)
The only thing I can do straight is shoot..

Offline bear60

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,104
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #25 on: March 25, 2007, 12:41:13 PM »
Its a sad commentary on the times....but  "going comando" was made popular by Joey on FRIENDS...wasnt it?
Poz Bear Type in Philadelphia

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 23,565
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #26 on: March 25, 2007, 03:14:54 PM »
In honor of this thread, I am now wearing a black leather "Cod Piece Tom Brief, Thong with Universal Pouch"
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline budndallastx

  • Member
  • Posts: 463
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #27 on: March 25, 2007, 04:14:23 PM »
Bear is correct, Going Commando came from the show "Friends".   


As for my preference, boxers around the house and tidy whiteys when away from home...


And Philly, care to share a pic ?!?  :P
Meds since: 11/20/2006
Sustiva / Truvada
12/08/2008 VL:<48 CD4 622 (38%)   
9/8/2008 VL:<48 CD4 573 (30%)
5/2008 VL:<48 CD4 464 (30%)
1/2008  VL: <50  CD4 425(28%)
9/2007   VL: <50  CD4 465 (27%)
6/2007   VL: <50   CD4 443 (26%)
3/2007  VL: <50   CD4 385 (25%)
12/2006 - VL: <50   CD4: 384 (25%)
11/2006 - VL:  22K  CD4: 208 (18%)

Offline Matty the Damned

  • Member
  • Posts: 12,160
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #28 on: March 25, 2007, 05:10:19 PM »
It has been well established that people who wear briefs are much more likely to be thieves and rapists.

Matty the Damned freeballs or wears boxers.

MtD

Offline JohnOso

  • Member
  • Posts: 816
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #29 on: March 25, 2007, 06:20:47 PM »
For me it is definitely boxers, not briefs. Have tried commando, but I just have too much hair all over that gets caught in zippers, buttons, seams, etc. , and I don't appreciate the pinching, pulling and snag.  Is this too much information?

Henry

I'm able to get a mental image, but I think I'm going to need some pictures to flesh it out a bit.

John

Offline Queen Tokelove

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,033
  • Smokey the Smurf
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #30 on: March 25, 2007, 10:32:58 PM »
I'm able to get a mental image, but I think I'm going to need some pictures to flesh it out a bit.

John

Hmmm speaking of imagining, are you wearing boxers in your avatar, John. Just curious and just saying......
Started Atripla/Ziagen on 9/13/07.
10/31/07 CD4-265 VL- undetectable
2/6/08 CD4- 401 VL- undetectable
5/7/08 CD4- 705 VL- undetectable
6/4/08 CD4- 775 VL- undetectable
8/6/08 CD4- 805 VL- undetectable
11/13/08 CD4- 774 VL--undetectable
2/4/09  CD4- 484  VL- 18,000 (2 months off meds)
3/3/09---Starting Back on Meds---
4/27/09 CD4- 664 VL-- undetectable
6/17/09 CD4- 438 VL- 439
8/09 CD4- 404 VL- 1,600
01-22-10-- CD4- 525 VL- 59,000
Cherish the simple things life has to offer

The Royal Blog

Offline megasept

  • Member
  • Posts: 478
  • Steven here...
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #31 on: March 25, 2007, 11:02:54 PM »
It has been well established that people who wear briefs are much more likely to be thieves and rapists.

Matty the Damned freeballs or wears boxers.

MtD

In that case. let me switch from boxers to briefs.  8)  -megasept

Offline thunter34

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,250
  • His name is Carl.
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #32 on: March 25, 2007, 11:45:11 PM »
AIDS isn't for sissies.

Offline aztecan

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,358
  • 28 years positive, 56 years a pain in the butt
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #33 on: March 26, 2007, 12:38:37 AM »
Actually, it wasn't friends where "going commando" originated, although the term may have started there.

Many of us old fagalas eschewed underwear back in the 70s. In fact, I remember a bar where underwear hung above the bar, removed from those foolish enough to wear them into the bar.

When I wear underwear, usually with slacks or dress pants, it is tighty whities, 2xist brand only, because they seem to be the only brand that include a pouch large enough to hold Jean Claude and the boys.

Jeans are made for commando mode though. That is why 501s became so popular, because with the buttons, there was easier access and no problems with things getting caught in a zipper.

I used to have trained 501s. One tug at the appropriate spot and all the buttons popped open, making for easy access for those nearby, especially on a crowded dance floor or dark back room.

HUGS,

Mark
"May your life preach more loudly than your lips."
~ William Ellery Channing (Unitarian Minister)

Offline fearless

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,191
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #34 on: March 26, 2007, 12:42:02 AM »
I've never understood boxers - if i'm wearing shorts/trousers/pants, why on earth would i wanna wear another pair of shorts underneath? It's all just too hot and uncomfortable.

I wear briefs.

Going Commando, while enticing is just not a great option given the HAART side effects.

I always thought, going commando meant, being ready for action

Be forgiving, be grateful, be optimistic

Offline Dachshund

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,921
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #35 on: March 26, 2007, 12:46:07 AM »
I wear what Joseph Smith tells me to wear...


         www.mormon-underwear.com
« Last Edit: March 26, 2007, 12:49:13 AM by Dachshund »

Offline thunter34

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,250
  • His name is Carl.
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #36 on: March 26, 2007, 12:50:20 AM »
Actually, it wasn't friends where "going commando" originated, although the term may have started there.

Many of us old fagalas eschewed underwear back in the 70s. In fact, I remember a bar where underwear hung above the bar, removed from those foolish enough to wear them into the bar.

When I wear underwear, usually with slacks or dress pants, it is tighty whities, 2xist brand only, because they seem to be the only brand that include a pouch large enough to hold Jean Claude and the boys.

Jeans are made for commando mode though. That is why 501s became so popular, because with the buttons, there was easier access and no problems with things getting caught in a zipper.

I used to have trained 501s. One tug at the appropriate spot and all the buttons popped open, making for easy access for those nearby, especially on a crowded dance floor or dark back room.

HUGS,

Mark


the trained 501's...star poster for this thread.
AIDS isn't for sissies.

Offline Dachshund

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,921
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #37 on: March 26, 2007, 12:59:58 AM »
I've never understood boxers - if i'm wearing shorts/trousers/pants, why on earth would i wanna wear another pair of shorts underneath? It's all just too hot and uncomfortable.

I wear briefs.

Going Commando, while enticing is just not a great option given the HAART side effects.

I always thought, going commando meant, being ready for action




If I were a betting man I would bet dollars to doughnuts, no one, I mean, no one looks cuter in briefs that our own little Steve.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2007, 01:05:07 AM by Dachshund »

Offline Miss Philicia

  • Member
  • Posts: 23,565
  • celebrity poster, faker & poser
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #38 on: March 26, 2007, 01:04:18 AM »
HAWT

I also have black rubber briefs and a wrestling singlet!
"Iíve slept with enough men to know that Iím not gay"

Offline david25luvit

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,409
  • Member since March 2005
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #39 on: March 26, 2007, 01:44:50 AM »
I'm not a lady (although some would disagree) but I'm a fan of both....
personally I wear boxers most of the time but with tight jeans and
shorts I wear boxer briefs......Just cause.... :P
In Memory of
Raymond David McRae III
Nov. 25, 1972- Oct. 15, 2004
I miss him terribly..........

Offline bt1313

  • Member
  • Posts: 32
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #40 on: March 26, 2007, 11:41:07 AM »
how about boxer briefs for me when its cold...but by summer its commando

Offline GSOgymrat

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,962
  • HIV+ since 1993. INTJ
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #41 on: March 26, 2007, 11:45:00 AM »
Ford's underwear fashion advice:

I think that men who are heavier look better in boxers and guys who are trim look better in briefs, particularly from behind. As a rule if you are going to wear bikini underwear you better have a flat stomach or you are just emphasizing that belly jelly. Similarly, unless it's for utilitarian purposes you better have a nice butt if you are running around in a jock strap. Those two elastic bands in the back can be unforgiving. If you are going commando in public make sure your pants or shorts are of heavy enough fabric and have enough crotch room. People don't mind seeing there is something down there but they don't want to know what religion you are. Note to people in the South and other humid regions who go commando-- underwear absorbs perspiration and butt crack sweat stains are never sexy.

Offline Basquo

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,235
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #42 on: March 26, 2007, 12:17:55 PM »
All of the above for me, except no boxers or commando in the summer--what we refer to as "sack-sticking weather."

Offline GSOgymrat

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,962
  • HIV+ since 1993. INTJ
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #43 on: March 26, 2007, 12:25:19 PM »
All of the above for me, except no boxers or commando in the summer--what we refer to as "sack-sticking weather."

LOL. So true.

Offline thunter34

  • Member
  • Posts: 7,250
  • His name is Carl.
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #44 on: March 26, 2007, 12:28:29 PM »
Another Star Poster award should be given to gso for his post 41.  Such a well thought out examination of all things underwear.  You've given this a great deal of thought, haven't you?   ;D
AIDS isn't for sissies.

Offline JohnOso

  • Member
  • Posts: 816
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #45 on: March 26, 2007, 07:56:54 PM »
Hmmm speaking of imagining, are you wearing boxers in your avatar, John. Just curious and just saying......


Yup those are boxers, my blue-collar undergarment of choice, Queen!  ;D

Offline Queen Tokelove

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,033
  • Smokey the Smurf
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #46 on: March 26, 2007, 08:06:39 PM »

Yup those are boxers, my blue-collar undergarment of choice, Queen!  ;D

While other things may be failing, at least I still have good eye sight. ;D
Started Atripla/Ziagen on 9/13/07.
10/31/07 CD4-265 VL- undetectable
2/6/08 CD4- 401 VL- undetectable
5/7/08 CD4- 705 VL- undetectable
6/4/08 CD4- 775 VL- undetectable
8/6/08 CD4- 805 VL- undetectable
11/13/08 CD4- 774 VL--undetectable
2/4/09  CD4- 484  VL- 18,000 (2 months off meds)
3/3/09---Starting Back on Meds---
4/27/09 CD4- 664 VL-- undetectable
6/17/09 CD4- 438 VL- 439
8/09 CD4- 404 VL- 1,600
01-22-10-- CD4- 525 VL- 59,000
Cherish the simple things life has to offer

The Royal Blog

Offline marc11864

  • Member
  • Posts: 440
  • I apologize for nothing!
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #47 on: March 27, 2007, 08:42:33 PM »
I've been wearing tighty whities since I got out of diapers. Nothing will ever change that. They took on a special significance for me about the same time that I was moving into my adolescence. Luv 'em! Soooo sexy!  ;D

(Note: I did not say "THE SAME" tighty whities.) :D
« Last Edit: March 27, 2007, 09:21:05 PM by marc11864 »
Let us cavort like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean.

Offline milker

  • Member
  • Posts: 4,034
  • Protected phone sex
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #48 on: March 27, 2007, 08:43:21 PM »
Oh yeah diapers  :D :D :D :D :D :D

Milker.
mid-dec: stupid ass
mid-jan: seroconversion
mid-feb: poz
mar 07: cd4 432 (35%) vl 54000
may 07: cd4 399 (28%) vl 27760
jul 07: cd4 403 (26%) vl 99241
oct 07: cd4 353 (24%) vl 29993
jan 08: cd4 332 (26%) vl 33308
mar 08: cd4 392 (23%) vl 75548
jun 08: cd4 325 (27%) vl 45880
oct 08: cd4 197 (20%) vl 154000 <== aids diagnosis
nov 2 08 start Atripla
nov 30 08: cd4 478 (23%) vl 1880 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
feb 19 09: cd4 398 (24%) vl 430 getting there!
apr 23 09: cd4 604 (29%) vl 50 woohoo :D :D
jul 30 09: cd4 512 (29%) vl undetectable :D :D
may 27 10: cd4 655 (32%) vl undetectable :D :D

Now accepting applications from blowjob ninjasô

Offline way.out.west

  • Member
  • Posts: 37
Re: boxers vs briefs..?
« Reply #49 on: March 27, 2007, 10:02:45 PM »
Definitely briefs.  I perspire down there more than most men, and that creates a clammy environment perfect for a fungus called tinea curis (jock itch), which causes my inner thighs to become painfully raw - trust me on this, jock itch is not conducive to dating.  Even though itís curable, the fungus can be hard to eliminate.  Briefs absorb the perspiration, keeping the equipment nice and dry.  Maybe thatís more than you all wanted to know.   :-[

EDITED TO ADD:  But if we're talking about what we want to see other men wearing, I vote for a t-shirt and nothing else.  ;)
« Last Edit: March 27, 2007, 10:30:07 PM by way.out.west »

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2014 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.