Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 16, 2024, 05:45:17 am

Login with username, password and session length


Members
  • Total Members: 37635
  • Latest: Ranoye
Stats
  • Total Posts: 773155
  • Total Topics: 66328
  • Online Today: 248
  • Online Ever: 5484
  • (June 18, 2021, 11:15:29 pm)
Users Online
Users: 1
Guests: 192
Total: 193

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Do I Have HIV?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: Insufficient Evidence to Support Universal HIV Treatment?  (Read 4508 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tednlou2

  • Member
  • Posts: 5,730
Insufficient Evidence to Support Universal HIV Treatment?
« on: August 30, 2013, 12:56:46 am »
Any thoughts? 


"A group of HIV experts believes there is not yet enough evidence to support a recommendation of universal antiretroviral treatment regardless of CD4 levels, aidsmap reports. Publishing their argument in the journal AIDS, a group of researchers from the United Kingdom, Australia and Brazil have critiqued various inconsistencies in several global bodies’ policies on when people with HIV should start treatment. The scientists reason that if these organizations used more exacting standards to rate the evidence on when to start treatment their recommendations would prove more in line with one another’s.

The guidelines discussed in the article include those of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, The International Antiviral Society USA, The World Health Organization (which recently recommended all people with HIV begin ARVs at 500 or fewer CD4s), the European AIDS Clinical Society and The British HIV Association.

The paper’s authors point out that there are no published results from a randomized controlled trial (RCT)—the gold standard of scientific research—that assess the risks and benefits of beginning treatment before CD4s hit 350. Among the four available observational cohort studies (which produce a less sterling form of scientific proof) addressing this concern, just two showed a higher death rate among those starting therapy after the 350 benchmark. Only one study showed a benefit of beginning therapy before CD4s drop below 500.

There are, however, two RCTs currently examining the difference of beginning therapy before or after CD4s fall below 350, with results expected in 2014 and 2016."

http://www.poz.com/articles/early_treatment_761_24456.shtml



Offline Jeff G

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 17,064
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: Insufficient Evidence to Support Universal HIV Treatment?
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2013, 01:32:59 am »
Its good that the article points out that there are some very good reasons why an individual should or could choose early treatment if its right for them .

Can a study factor in the human reasons for early treatment ?
HIV 101 - Basics
HIV 101
You can read more about Transmission and Risks here:
HIV Transmission and Risks
You can read more about Testing here:
HIV Testing
You can read more about Treatment-as-Prevention (TasP) here:
HIV TasP
You can read more about HIV prevention here:
HIV prevention
You can read more about PEP and PrEP here
PEP and PrEP

Offline Ann

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 28,134
  • It just is, OK?
    • Num is sum qui mentiar tibi?
Re: Insufficient Evidence to Support Universal HIV Treatment?
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2013, 05:13:37 am »
I'd highly recommend that people read the more comprehensive article on aidsmap.com, rather than only reading the quicky version on poz.com. (Nothing wrong with the quicky version, but the aidsmap article is much more informative.)

http://www.aidsmap.com/Evidence-is-not-yet-sufficient-to-recommend-universal-treatment-clinicians-and-community-writers-say/page/2718639/
Condoms are a girl's best friend

Condom and Lube Info  

"...health will finally be seen not as a blessing to be wished for, but as a human right to be fought for." Kofi Annan

Nymphomaniac: a woman as obsessed with sex as an average man. Mignon McLaughlin

HIV is certainly character-building. It's made me see all of the shallow things we cling to, like ego and vanity. Of course, I'd rather have a few more T-cells and a little less character. Randy Shilts

Offline buginme2

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,426
Re: Insufficient Evidence to Support Universal HIV Treatment?
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2013, 11:38:42 am »

Can a study factor in the human reasons for early treatment ?

Study, Study, Study and this article shows how two similar studies can show different results.  The NA-ACCORD study showed a benefit starting early (94% less likely to die if starting >500 cd4 count yet the CASCADE showed no benefit). 

How about the individual benefit?  At this point I don't care what any other study says on this subject.  I know for me, myself, and I....I feel better on treatment than off treatment and am 110% happy that I started when I was diagnosed versus waiting, 

Bottom line, I feel better.....a lot better (and my numbers weren't "bad").  I'm 96 percent less likely to transmit to my partner.  I feel better, look better, happier, and 96% less likely to transmit to my partner. 

Kind of surprised that we are still having this conversation.

Edited to add;  I'm kind of concerned that people who have been told to start treatment by their doctors see these discussions and think "I can wait."  Or they are hoping that they can wait because its not proven one way or another.   People still die from untreated HIV and even untreated hiv at higher cd4 counts still leads to things like cancer, heart disease, liver and kidney disease etc etc etc.  just a thought
« Last Edit: August 30, 2013, 11:46:09 am by buginme2 »
Don't be fancy, just get dancey

Offline jkinatl2

  • Member
  • Posts: 6,007
  • Doo. Dah. Dipp-ity.
Re: Insufficient Evidence to Support Universal HIV Treatment?
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2013, 11:54:06 am »
I am biased, I suppose, but I am totally for starting treatment upon diagnosis if possible (access to meds and treatment, psychological and physical ability to adhere to meds). Not only does it preserve the innate immune system AND render the person far less infectious (TAP) but almost everyone on these forums says that starting treatment gives them a feeling of empowerment over the virus, rather than waiting while it eats enough of the immune system away to warrant a doctor's suggestion.

That empowerment cannot be overstated, as I firmly believe it helps a person adjust to the diagnosis and take back control over his/her life.

"Many people, especially in the gay community, turn to oral sex as a safer alternative in the age of AIDS. And with HIV rates rising, people need to remember that oral sex is safer sex. It's a reasonable alternative."

-Kimberly Page-Shafer, PhD, MPH

Welcome Thread

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2024 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.