Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 25, 2024, 04:39:05 pm

Login with username, password and session length


Members
  • Total Members: 37652
  • Latest: Han2024
Stats
  • Total Posts: 773291
  • Total Topics: 66348
  • Online Today: 697
  • Online Ever: 5484
  • (June 18, 2021, 11:15:29 pm)
Users Online
Users: 1
Guests: 678
Total: 679

Welcome


Welcome to the POZ Community Forums, a round-the-clock discussion area for people with HIV/AIDS, their friends/family/caregivers, and others concerned about HIV/AIDS.  Click on the links below to browse our various forums; scroll down for a glance at the most recent posts; or join in the conversation yourself by registering on the left side of this page.

Privacy Warning:  Please realize that these forums are open to all, and are fully searchable via Google and other search engines. If you are HIV positive and disclose this in our forums, then it is almost the same thing as telling the whole world (or at least the World Wide Web). If this concerns you, then do not use a username or avatar that are self-identifying in any way. We do not allow the deletion of anything you post in these forums, so think before you post.

  • The information shared in these forums, by moderators and members, is designed to complement, not replace, the relationship between an individual and his/her own physician.

  • All members of these forums are, by default, not considered to be licensed medical providers. If otherwise, users must clearly define themselves as such.

  • Forums members must behave at all times with respect and honesty. Posting guidelines, including time-out and banning policies, have been established by the moderators of these forums. Click here for “Do I Have HIV?” posting guidelines. Click here for posting guidelines pertaining to all other POZ community forums.

  • We ask all forums members to provide references for health/medical/scientific information they provide, when it is not a personal experience being discussed. Please provide hyperlinks with full URLs or full citations of published works not available via the Internet. Additionally, all forums members must post information which are true and correct to their knowledge.

  • Product advertisement—including links; banners; editorial content; and clinical trial, study or survey participation—is strictly prohibited by forums members unless permission has been secured from POZ.

To change forums navigation language settings, click here (members only), Register now

Para cambiar sus preferencias de los foros en español, haz clic aquí (sólo miembros), Regístrate ahora

Finished Reading This? You can collapse this or any other box on this page by clicking the symbol in each box.

Author Topic: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux  (Read 3624 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nychope1

  • Guest
The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« on: December 04, 2010, 08:55:48 pm »
Removed per El Z's request.

« Last Edit: December 04, 2010, 09:58:10 pm by nychope1 »

Offline phildinftlaudy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,985
  • sweet Ann what you think babe...
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2010, 09:11:17 pm »
Hey my new friends. I have thick skin. I moved this from a response in newly poz to here. Come and get it before my moderator pals move it.

But I promise no babies arms growing out of your back, no mental ward, no facial problems and no big deal. Respect the meds but don't be afraid of them. They are your new friends. They may actually help you sleep. They help me sleep though I stayed up too late tonight.


So you are diagnosed two months ago; join these forums one month ago; and on meds for 25 days and this makes you an expert?  This allows you to thumb your nose at the moderators?  This allows you to make promises about the effects or non-effects of a drug (are you a doctor?).  Act like you somehow have the right to run the forums or override moderators?

Newly diagnosed:  Check
Flamebait:  Check
Piece of work: Check
September 13, 2008 - diagnosed +
Labs:
Date    CD4    %   VL     Date  CD4  %   VL
10/08  636    35  510   9/09 473  38 2900  12/4/09 Atripla
12/09  540    30    60   
12/10  740    41  <48   
8/11    667    36  <20  
03/12  1,041  42  <20
05/12  1,241  47  <20
08/12   780    37  <20
11/12   549    35  <20
02/12  1,102  42  <20
11/12   549    35  <20

Offline RapidRod

  • Member
  • Posts: 15,288
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2010, 09:13:17 pm »
No I wouldn't want anyone reading your posts. 

nychope1

  • Guest
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2010, 09:38:57 pm »
So you are diagnosed two months ago; join these forums one month ago; and on meds for 25 days and this makes you an expert?  This allows you to thumb your nose at the moderators?  This allows you to make promises about the effects or non-effects of a drug (are you a doctor?).  Act like you somehow have the right to run the forums or override moderators?

Newly diagnosed:  Check
Flamebait:  Check
Piece of work: Check

I won't pussy out and complain that you are name calling. It's fine.

You started Atripla, did you survive your first few weeks? You have been on meds for a while. Are you experienced enough to give comfort to a person who is just staring them?

Offline Rev. Moon

  • Member
  • Posts: 3,787
  • Smart ass faggot ©
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2010, 09:41:10 pm »
Real point of opening yet another thread about this topic?  To elicit negative responses from members who have let you know how they feel about your stand on the "AIDS meds ain't no big deal" debacle?  To taunt the moderators?  To claim that you supposedly "coined" the sentence "no big deal"?  

Seems to me like you just want to stir the pot.  In the process you are causing some decent new members to feel isolated and/or attacked.  

And Shugah, no offense, but you ain't no expert.  You may want to eat some humble pie; hopefully there is some left over from Thanksgiving.
"I have tried hard--but life is difficult, and I am a very useless person. I can hardly be said to have an independent existence. I was just a screw or a cog in the great machine I called life, and when I dropped out of it I found I was of no use anywhere else."

Offline phildinftlaudy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,985
  • sweet Ann what you think babe...
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2010, 09:50:52 pm »
I won't pussy out and complain that you are name calling. It's fine.

You started Atripla, did you survive your first few weeks? You have been on meds for a while. Are you experienced enough to give comfort to a person who is just staring them?

I don't see anywhere in my post where I called anyone a name.
I've been on Atripla exactly one year today - my side effects have been minimal - I do share that with those just starting Atripla (when they ask); however, I am also sure to point out that everyone's experience is different and there are people who have not tolerated it or other meds well (each person is different).

I am not so arrogant as to think that I can promise people that they will or will not have certain side effects.  I also defer many times to the experiencd members and LTS' who have a wealth more experience with HIV and various meds then I have.

I lso show the upmost respect for the moderators and don't try to post threads with the obvious intention of circumventing or disrepecting their guidance and oversight of these forums for the benefit of all members (and guests).

September 13, 2008 - diagnosed +
Labs:
Date    CD4    %   VL     Date  CD4  %   VL
10/08  636    35  510   9/09 473  38 2900  12/4/09 Atripla
12/09  540    30    60   
12/10  740    41  <48   
8/11    667    36  <20  
03/12  1,041  42  <20
05/12  1,241  47  <20
08/12   780    37  <20
11/12   549    35  <20
02/12  1,102  42  <20
11/12   549    35  <20

Offline Jeff G

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 17,064
  • How am I doing Beren ?
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2010, 09:51:57 pm »
All of this started when you were gently and politely advised that starting meds is a big deal for many people and perhaps you shouldn't tell people how to feel , it seems you are more concerned about being right than concerned for the members of this forum .

That little taunt at the bottom of your post leads one to assume you like drama .
HIV 101 - Basics
HIV 101
You can read more about Transmission and Risks here:
HIV Transmission and Risks
You can read more about Testing here:
HIV Testing
You can read more about Treatment-as-Prevention (TasP) here:
HIV TasP
You can read more about HIV prevention here:
HIV prevention
You can read more about PEP and PrEP here
PEP and PrEP

nychope1

  • Guest
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2010, 09:53:29 pm »
Rev... I could have left this where it was. I read that someone felt cut out of responding to the thread so I posted it here. It wasn't a malicious move.

It is more to my point than    jkinatl2 made it out to be. I deserve my say. I never said I was an expert. Phil did.

I am pos and took meds and experienced the first month so without going into research and all I will rely on that experience to make those remarks.

So far this was met with hostility. You all had the opportunity to take a higher road and still do.

Offline ElZorro

  • Member
  • Posts: 535
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2010, 09:54:40 pm »
Real point of opening yet another thread about this topic?  To elicit negative responses from members who have let you know how they feel about your stand on the "AIDS meds ain't no big deal" debacle?  To taunt the moderators?  To claim that you supposedly "coined" the sentence "no big deal"?  

Seems to me like you just want to stir the pot.  In the process you are causing some decent new members to feel isolated and/or attacked.  

C'mon, NYC! You're better than this, man. Rev's right. You've stated your position and clarified it when it was initially misunderstood and it generated one of the healthiest most civil debates I've seen out here. No one is going to agree on everything. You know I love you, man, but does it really serve any constructive purpose to try to spit in anyone's eye?

nychope1

  • Guest
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2010, 09:55:57 pm »
All of this started when you were gently and politely advised that starting meds is a big deal for many people and perhaps you shouldn't tell people how to feel , it seems you are more concerned about being right than concerned for the members of this forum .

That little taunt at the bottom of your post leads one to assume you like drama .

The little taunt is called humor. Much of which is lacking around here.

nychope1

  • Guest
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2010, 09:56:59 pm »
C'mon, NYC! You're better than this, man. Rev's right. You've stated your position and clarified it when it was initially misunderstood and it generated one of the healthiest most civil debates I've seen out here. No one is going to agree on everything. You know I love you, man, but does it really serve any constructive purpose to try to spit in anyone's eye?

It wasn't meant to spit in anyone's eye but I will gladly remove it as I believe you are a voice of reason.

Offline RapidRod

  • Member
  • Posts: 15,288
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2010, 09:59:17 pm »
The little taunt is called humor. Much of which is lacking around here.
Humor? Never mind..

Offline phildinftlaudy

  • Member
  • Posts: 2,985
  • sweet Ann what you think babe...
Re: The Original Intention of "No Big Deal" -> Part deux
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2010, 09:59:36 pm »
I never said I was an expert. Phil did.

I

I definitely never said you were an expert - far from that - it was phrased as a question (if you reread my post you may see that) --- although, some people have reported cognitive effects related to meds - (which can be a big deal)... so I understand how you may have misread what I clearly wrote.
September 13, 2008 - diagnosed +
Labs:
Date    CD4    %   VL     Date  CD4  %   VL
10/08  636    35  510   9/09 473  38 2900  12/4/09 Atripla
12/09  540    30    60   
12/10  740    41  <48   
8/11    667    36  <20  
03/12  1,041  42  <20
05/12  1,241  47  <20
08/12   780    37  <20
11/12   549    35  <20
02/12  1,102  42  <20
11/12   549    35  <20

 


Terms of Membership for these forums
 

© 2024 Smart + Strong. All Rights Reserved.   terms of use and your privacy
Smart + Strong® is a registered trademark of CDM Publishing, LLC.